fallingblock wrote on Jan 2
nd, 2016 at 12:45pm:
Perhaps the factory decided that the 32-40 was not a good idea after doing some ie they realized it was a mistake. The major problem with the Low Wall is the block is not supported above the center line of the bore. The thrust from the breach block is placed on the top of the rear of the frame. I have seen many low walls with cracks at that point.
Cheers,
Laurie
I would guess you're correct. Many makers have offered calibers that seem questionable today, and the number made would indicate the makers determined it wasn't a good idea. In the case of the Low Wall and .32-40, I only see an occasional picture, and the only ones I've held were reworked to the caliber.
I've seen many more Ballard #2 in .44-40, and believe Marlin made a fair amount before they dropped the cartridge. See a very small number in .44 Long, which seem much rarer than those in .44-40, but probably because it wasn't a big seller, and switched to .44-40 quickly.
Have had several Stevens 44 in .44-40, and .38-40, which tells me they sold a fair amount. Have seen and owned a number of Win. Low Walls in .44-40, or .38-40, and assume that it was offered for a number of years also.