Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Highwalls (Read 19821 times)
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 3914
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: Highwalls
Reply #15 - Jul 4th, 2006 at 4:30pm
Print Post  
I haven't chimed in on this thread because I was a little unsure whether we were discussing real high-walls (from the old Winchester, or copied by Ballard Rifle, Meacham, or less well by a couple of others) or the Japanese High Walls which look like the former but only on the outside.   Undecided

     My love for the real high-walls is well documented and I won't go into all of the reasons here, but it should be mentioned at this point that Ballard Rifle is now making a faithful reproduction of the late (original) Winchester high-wall in TAKE-DOWN configuration.  Now we're talking!!  Grin  Grin  Grin  Everything that DWS just said can be duplicated in the new copy of the Winchester, and you will have a real high quality rifle.  As to the negative comments about difficulty loading, I would maintain that anyone with normal digital dexterity can easily load anything as long as a .25-20 SS or more.  I will admit that .22 short is difficult under a scope in a high-wall, but that's why we have low-walls!  That's my story and I'm sticking to it!   Cool

Froggie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1650
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Highwalls
Reply #16 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 2:55am
Print Post  
I agree, for sheer beauty, you need a Martini  Wink
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sharps1874
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #17 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 12:46pm
Print Post  
OK, let me chime in as well. As the person that originated this post, my question was not meant to be a difficult one. That is i was asking about the difference between high walls as a whole comapre to none high walls, as an examply but not the only examply would be my Shiloh Sharps...that is not a high wall. My actual statement was"I’ve never shot a high wall. Yet I’m wondering what is the benefit of the high wall or is there one? I own and shoot a Shiloh Sharps in 45-70. And yes, I know they don’t make any high walls. Just curious about the high wall. " I would appreciate that on this post that any conversations that have to do with anything other the my high wall question be taken off line. I do understand how a posting of one question can bring on a discussion of something else that is not true to the post as hand. 

DWS8130, reply #12,

                               Your reply to this post was on the money. In short, your reply was more in what I was looking for. It was educational, it gave me a much better understanding about high walls...something that I know nothing about. You broke it down for me, and all others to understand. Thank you for your reply, and taking the time to explain the high wall and much more in that reply. Well done, and kudos. 

                                



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #18 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 2:00pm
Print Post  
Sharps1874,
With regards to how a thread goes off track, have you ever listened to a conversation between any two or more people?  Conversation has a way of wandering - often quite profitably.

But back to your question.  While lock time etc, are shorter on an Hwall, it should be noted that these differences are slight in the extreme when measured on targets.  Few Schuetzen shooters use Sharps rifles, so few win with them.  But those that do can, and do, run with the pack, sometimes at the head of the pack at that.  Given how few use a Sharps at Schuetzen, I am continually surprised at how well they can do.   

As for things like rotational torque of hte hammer, it is a nice theoretical fact; no dispute.  But so long as your grip is the same every time, and this is true of ANY rifle, the effect of rotational torque is zero.  The rotational torque of the side hammer vs the central hammer is miniscule next to the torque of the accelerating bullet - something that affects both guns equally.   

In my mind, the biggest advantages of the Hiwall are it's efficiency of handling and fit.  The hammer is quicker, easier to cock and the rifle, in most configurations, both carries easier and fits better.  It can also be much lighter w/o sacrificing meaningful strength.   

Finally the Highwall cocks the hammer when the block is raised.  That is not the case for the Sharps - this makes second shots on game a bit easier and one less thing to worry about at the bench in competition.   

In the end, I think the differences with regards to accuracy potential is infintessimally small with the largest difference in terms of competition going to the likely goodness of fit of an off the rack rifle, and the ergonomics of a hunting rifle both going to the the Highwall.   

I shoot and love both.  They are my favorite two flavors of rifles, bar no others.  Which one I like best depends only on my mood of the day.   

In the end, I would not expect to increase my scores with one vs the other, unless the game is offhand competition, in which case the Wall wins because they fit me best.   

As you can see from the posts, your mileage may vary.  Mine certainly does.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PowderFlask2
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #19 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 5:32pm
Print Post  
Repeat after me

Sharps are ugly
High walls are beautiful

Sharps are ugly
High walls are beautiful

Sharps are ugly
High walls are beautiful

Grin

Gary
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schutzenbob
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Rheinisch-Westfälisc
hen Sprengstoff-Fabriken

Posts: 1972
Location: Nightingale, California
Joined: Oct 24th, 2005
Re: Highwalls
Reply #20 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 6:12pm
Print Post  
The thing about a Highwall Winchester that's so simple and ingenious is that John Browning put the sear above the hammer, not below, so that you can drop the lever, which lowers the breechblock and simultaniously, gently, lowers the hammer and it does all this without harming a thing. When you raise the lever, it puts you right back to full cock again, unless it's equiped with a fly, and you're ready to fire. The Highwall Winchester action is simple, very strong, well made and very well designed. Over the years many folks have tried to improve on it's design, but haven't. Now, as to the Sharps action, I believe that this is what Browing started with when he designed his action. So the '85 action has the strong points of the Sharps, plus several more. You could make a good argument the a Highwall action is an improved Sharps action.

Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sharps1874
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #21 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 9:11pm
Print Post  
Brent,

         Don’t get me wrong, a question on something else is not a bad thing…just perhaps another thread on that question could be started or would be more appropriate. I’ve seen way too many threads start out in one direction… then one person starts it in another direction that the post was not intended for. That’s all I was concerned about. 

     I’m still confused on how the lock time a hammer would make a difference on how a rifle shoots. If you and I were to be at the same range at 200 yards, you with you high wall and I with my Sharps shooting the same loads… and all we were going to compare was the accuracy between the two rifles…does the high walls fast lock time make your rifle more accurate? And lets just for argument take away the human error, and lets say the rifles were in fixed bench rest, that is lock into place. I know that this is not how it would have been done, but just to eliminate any argument of human error. 

     Now as for the hammers themselves, yes I do absolutely agree with you on how heavy the Sharps Hammers are. I take it that the high walls are not as heavy. I can pull my hammer back with my thumb, yet it is not easy. I would think that there would be some difference in the rotational torque between the two hammers. Yes, perhaps it is a small difference. 

     I would have to say that the side hammer, well the one that I have is not easy to cock, and that would have been nice if it was. That is an advantage in the high wall, yet like all things in life you work with and live with what you have. So I’ll just get better at making my rifle easier for me to cock the hammer back. I’ll have one heck of a strong right thumb. 
   
          As for not having a high wall to compare to all I can say is when it comes to how a rifle carries and fits and fits really depends on the person. a rifle may carry well and fit one person great, and it may also be an excellent rifle to shoot, yet it may not be the say for another person. As I’m sure you could have 2 high walls that you could say fits and feels great where the other does not, and they are the same rifle. Just a thought not an argument.

     I think when it comes to having a rifle that will cock your hammer back is something of a personal preference. I for one, don’t care to have my hammer cocked until I’m ready to shoot it, and not before…that is purely my own opinion. 

     I can see where the high wall would have an incredible advantage if your shoot is under the clock such in SASS competition. The BP shoots give you plenty of time to shoot your Paper Target or Silhouettes. 

     As you can see you gave me allot to think about, and ponder over. This gives me a better understanding of the high wall, and when it’s spoken about around me, I’ll have more to say or not to say about it. Perhaps more better well developed questions about the high walls among my friends and other shoots. 
   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #22 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 9:53pm
Print Post  
Quote:
... you with you high wall and I with my Sharps shooting the same loads… and all we were going to compare was the accuracy between the two rifles…does the high walls fast lock time make your rifle more accurate? And lets just for argument take away the human error, and lets say the rifles were in fixed bench rest, that is lock into place. I know that this is not how it would have been done, but just to eliminate any argument of human error.


If you take away handling by a human and the bench rest is "perfect" then no, there is no difference.  If there is the potential for movement between when the trigger is pulled until when the firing pin is struck, then there is the potential for differences in accuracy.  But try and prove it empirically!

Quote:
I take it that the high walls are not as heavy. I can pull my hammer back with my thumb, yet it is not easy. I would think that there would be some difference in the rotational torque between the two hammers. Yes, perhaps it is a small difference.


Even if there is a BIG difference in rotational torque it does not matter so long as the human is perfectly consistent in controlling or not controlling this torque.  Consistency is everything.  Torque is nothing if consistency is there.  
 
Quote:
As for not having a high wall to compare to all I can say is when it comes to how a rifle carries and fits and fits really depends on the person. a rifle may carry well and fit one person great, and it may also be an excellent rifle to shoot, yet it may not be the say for another person. As I’m sure you could have 2 high walls that you could say fits and feels great where the other does not, and they are the same rifle. Just a thought not an argument.


I have shot many Sharps and many walls.  The walls are always better balanced and fit.  I don't think it is just me, but perhaps that is a part of it.  The Special Sporting Rifle configuration of the wall is just about the best balanced rifle I have ever handled, bar none.  A few other folks feel the same way.  The large and very heavy action of the Sharps, and the very thick wrist are two things that really cannot be corrected.  It's a clunkier rifle, but that does not mean it is unloveable.  It just is what it is.  

Quote:
I think when it comes to having a rifle that will cock your hammer back is something of a personal preference. I for one, don’t care to have my hammer cocked until I’m ready to shoot it, and not before…that is purely my own opinion.


There are variants of the walls that will not cock on working the action.  But like just about every lever action repeater or pump gun, having an autococking hammer is not an issue for me.  How that rates for you is up to you, but you asked for the facts.  These are the facts.  

Quote:
I can see where the high wall would have an incredible advantage if your shoot is under the clock such in SASS competition. The BP shoots give you plenty of time to shoot your Paper Target or Silhouettes.


Not all of them, SASS not withstanding

Quote:
As you can see you gave me allot to think about, and ponder over. This gives me a better understanding of the high wall, and when it’s spoken about around me, I’ll have more to say or not to say about it. Perhaps more better well developed questions about the high walls among my friends and other shoots.


Well, try one.  I bet you will like it just fine.  You will not want to throw out your Sharps either.  But a wall is a mighty fine gun.  Better than the vast majority and just as good as the rest.

Brent

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sharps1874
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #23 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 10:13pm
Print Post  
Brent,

       Thanks for the honesty and not beating around the bush, that's refreshing. You have many great points, and thanks once again for sharing your knowldge with myself, and the others out there that are reading this thread.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
38_Cal
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2240
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Joined: Apr 27th, 2005
Re: Highwalls
Reply #24 - Jul 5th, 2006 at 11:27pm
Print Post  
Try a little test to see how your rifle handles on the sandbags.  With a dummy round, or even a primed case, in che chamber, align your sights on the target.  Touching only the trigger (if you have set triggers) or pinching the trigger with your finger and the thumb at the back of the guard, pull the trigger.  Without moving the rifle, check the sight alignment to the target.  Faster lock time & lighter hammer will find the rifle moving much less on the sandbags.  You can see this best with a scope on each rifle, but you'll find that if you're careful with checking iron sights, you will find the same results.  It just takes more care and skill to control a heavy hammer rifle than a light hammer one, like the Winchester Hi Walls.   

One other factor to consider between the Sharps and Winchester is the firing pin fragility of the Sharps.  You have two right angle bends between the hammer nose and the primer, while the Winchester has a straight shot to the firing pin.   

David
Montezuma, IA
  

David Kaiser
Montezuma, IA
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sharps1874
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #25 - Jul 6th, 2006 at 1:28am
Print Post  
38_Cal,

     When I shoot, I’m always using my set trigger. It’s only at 15 oz. It’s just right for me. When I bench shoot, I’m using the Caldwell front and rear bench rest…the best one that they have. They are much better then standard sand bags. I’ve shot using sandbags for years, not as good. I just don’t think a faster lock time is that important to me or for my shooting. If I’m wrong, well I guess I’m the one that will pay the price. 

     Yes, you are correct on how fragile the firing pin is on the Sharps. 

               Well that's it for tonight, I'm casting bullets tomorrow morning and shooting with a friend and his son on Friday. This month is his sons first pig shoot. Were going up on the ranch up in the local hills to get in some shoot off of shooting sticks at 100 yards and some free hand shoot for the kid. It's nice seeing a young hunter and shooter taking to what we all have been having fun doing for years. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
xxgrampa
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #26 - Jul 8th, 2006 at 3:31am
Print Post  
dear 1874,

GOD MENT FOR ALL PEOPLE TO SHOOT WALLS!!!!

when bannermans wae built,  he used sharps and rolling block barreled actions for re-bar.imo a good use for them..

as was said by a very wise man in this post, 'walls are beautiful'.

once you have shot with a 'wall;, the sharps will feel like a 2x6 on your shoulder.

..ttfn..grampa..

PS... i am not biased, have 3 shilo's
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
xxgrampa
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #27 - Jul 8th, 2006 at 3:35am
Print Post  
PPS... don't listen to that guy from belgium. plug your ears. if you don't, you will end up with an arm load of martinies.. Cry

tt.g.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
screwloose
Ex Member


Re: Highwalls
Reply #28 - Jul 8th, 2006 at 11:15am
Print Post  
XXGRAMPS
AND WHAT IS WRONG WITH AN ARMLOAD OF MARTINIES?  The guys with the Winchesters can't seem to get them back together after they take them apart.  Martinies dont have that problem, and most of them have good triggers. Could never understand why you would have to take a new, expensive gun apart and possbly rebarrel to get it to shoot.
Which has been discussed quite a bit on this board with the 22s. When I build my large bore I think I will use a Ruger. Which leaves the possibility of going to a 458 Win if i want bigger. As for the Sharps I think the Pedersoli will do anything I need out of the box.Problem is you can't have enough of these things and they all have to be different.
In small Martinis I have a 12/15, a MKll, 222R, and a 30/30 Wesson all capable of shooting tight groups. No lg Martini yet. 2 Itialian High walls 30/30 win and 45/70. Dont know why i
I bought a lowall 45LC other than it was a pretty scheutzen. For the possibility of shooting long range and because it was on sale I bought a Pedersoli Heavy Sharps from Cabellas. Now you have my opinion. My favorite real rifle is a Remington 600 350 Mag. carbine which I have had forever.
Tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kodiak
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 5
Location: N.E. Missouri
Joined: Jul 8th, 2006
Re: Highwalls
Reply #29 - Jul 8th, 2006 at 1:09pm
Print Post  
A while back I got a NIB Uberti Highwall carbine in a gun-trade deal. It's a 45/70 with a heavy 28" round barrel and very plain sights. But it does have a shot-gun buttstock. As of today, I haven't put any decent sights on it, so no shots have been fired thru the new barrel. Lookin' forward to makin' some smoke with it in the near future   Wink .
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint