Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA (Read 3428 times)
Pentz
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Funf und Zwanzig mit den
Hut

Posts: 435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Sep 4th, 2014
Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Sep 20th, 2023 at 11:02pm
Print Post  
First off, let me say that I have poured through Schwartz/Dell, and have done likewise with Larry Gibson's writings.  I understand the process of ringing with loaded ammunition.  However, the risk of ringing a chamber with breech seated bullets and a charged 32-20 CPA case having a thin wet floral foam wad down on the powder escapes me.  How would a disintegrating floral foam wad contribute to potential ringing?
  I noted Schwartz's comments of a foam wad .10 above the powder and a card wad at the mouth of the case and for the life of me wonder how that procedure escapes the ringing issue.
  Open to assistance, please.
  

ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cbashooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1608
Location: Eastern Wa.
Joined: Mar 31st, 2018
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #1 - Sep 20th, 2023 at 11:09pm
Print Post  
I will follow this one.i have the same questions.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RSW
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1269
Location: Arizona
Joined: Sep 8th, 2006
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #2 - Sep 21st, 2023 at 12:43am
Print Post  
It's not the wad that causes the chamber ring but a shock wave set up by the powder charge. Over simplified but that's the gist of it as explained by my understanding of Schwartz & Dell's experiments.
  

Randy W
ASSRA 10211  -  ISSA 125
There are indeed two Americas. Simply put, it is not the haves and have nots. The two Americans are in reality divided into those who do and those who don't.
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7543
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #3 - Sep 21st, 2023 at 2:28am
Print Post  
I don't understand what actually causes this but, I am a victim of it.

Mine happened with a 30/40 HW. The load was 18.5 gr of 296. I had chronoed the load and in the second CBA match, I shot it in, I had a case stick, in the next round, I had to use my cleaning rod to get it out. The bulge was just to the rear of the shoulder.

The wad I used was much more fragile that the floral foam. It was 1/8" thick and 3/8" square, with large air cells. I push it in with a 1/4" dowel.

I did read Dell's reasoning of barrel ringing and his conclusion was that the power has to "slump" to avoid it and can not be held directly against the primer.

After reading that, my thoughts on my mishap, was that, the full power charge, was thrown forward and when it hit the bullet base (fixed), the shock wave pulverized the powder and that combo, caused the pressure rise that bulged the barrel.

You can think what you want, regarding this but, when it actually happened to you, you won't want to try it again.

I put wads in case mouths, to prevent powder spilling, if necessary but, that's it! 

"Once bitten, twice shy"
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1722
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #4 - Sep 21st, 2023 at 3:38am
Print Post  
Basically, you don't want the top of the powder column 'vertical', i.e. at the same angle as the bullet base.  This is the condition that can cause chamber ringing.  The only way to get this condition is to put a wad on top of and in contact with the powder (or shooting vertically).

So nothing to do with the wad itself.  And putting the wad just a bit above the powder already will put the powder column at an angle (unless you compressed it), so the condition is not met.

Using a wad 'to make sure the powder is at the back of the case' can create the condition.

It's probably not the only condition that can cause chamber ringing, but the main one.  So RSW is right, nothing to do with wads slamming in the bullet base or suchlike - by doing this, you create a specific pressure condition that is able to ring a chamber.

So the condition to avoid is 'a wad down on the powder', it must be 'above the powder', with (at least) a bit of airspace between powder column and wad allowing the powder to slump a bit.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Barrabruce
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 77
Location: Australia
Joined: Mar 30th, 2017
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #5 - Dec 30th, 2023 at 7:38am
Print Post  
What about a fluff or nap of Dacron or kapok?
I understand the need for the slumping of the powder with a wad.

But wouldn’t a filler just combust?

I was thinking of a nap of kapok and them some grits, flour, or lube to form a wad and seal the bullet base in an attempt to get a badly pitted bore to shoot.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rgchristensen
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1164
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2014
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #6 - Dec 30th, 2023 at 8:25am
Print Post  
Barrabruce wrote on Dec 30th, 2023 at 7:38am:
What about a fluff or nap of Dacron or kapok?
I understand the need for the slumping of the powder with a wad.

But wouldn’t a filler just combust?

I was thinking of a nap of kapok and them some grits, flour, or lube to form a wad and seal the bullet base in an attempt to get a badly pitted bore to shoot.


As RANDY said, it's not the PRESENCE of a filler or wad, but the POSITION of the powder that causes the problem.  If you follow Charlie Dell's work, he and Helbert were able to ring chambers by aiming a rifle straight up, no wad at all.

Putting a wad behind a bullet, NOT on the powder, preferably a LDPE one, should be fine for sealing gases.

CHRIS
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Barrabruce
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 77
Location: Australia
Joined: Mar 30th, 2017
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #7 - Dec 30th, 2023 at 4:08pm
Print Post  
Thanks!

Just so as I can waste your time and make you scream down the computer at me ,and pull your hair out, may I ask?

What if one put a fluffy tuft of kapok on the base of the case  over the primer then the powder and wads.
Would it work like a compressed load or make matters worse?

I’m sure people have found many ways to blow themselves up.

I’m not real confident in placing a wad deep in the neck of a case where it will rest and not fall through.
I don’t want to use a heap of filler that will compact into a hard wad at the case shoulder either.

Looks like I will be looking for recycle 4 plastic containers to cut up.

Thanks from a 61year old delinquent trying to make 62.



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4209
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #8 - Dec 30th, 2023 at 6:17pm
Print Post  
If you have kapok you just need a fluff (an amazingly small quantity - I believe Charlie Dell even gave a weight) not touching the powder (again, the powder must be allowed to slump!) but some distance above and not pressed down. The fluffiness of the kapok allows it to expand and remain in place against the cartridge walls and keeps the powder in the vicinity of the cartridge base to receive the primer burn. For the small size of the 32-20 brass I can't really imagine why any thing needs to be in the case except powder. If fast pistol powders are being used they are so easily ignited it wouldn't make any difference and if slower powders are being used they pretty much fill the case.
« Last Edit: Dec 30th, 2023 at 6:22pm by oneatatime »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1722
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #9 - Dec 31st, 2023 at 2:52am
Print Post  
Bruce,
No need to place the wad that deep - higher is better actually, and no wad even better.  Whatever will make sure the top of the powder column isn't parallell to the bullet base.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7670
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #10 - Dec 31st, 2023 at 8:30am
Print Post  
Same conversation at my gun club range Friday. New single shot shooters reading old publications looking for better accuracy and asking  “which wad” 

Told them about Charlie Dells experiment, don’t think they believed it. After all lot of gun writers published wad articles way back then, same guys that recommended casting with wheel weights.  

I agree there can be advantage protecting the bullets base. Gas checks do that, if rules don’t allow gas checks fiber base wad will do the same, if you can get it to stay in place. Case full of BP wad then bullet works . No support for the wad not so sure it’s going to stay in place.

Boats
« Last Edit: Dec 31st, 2023 at 8:49am by boats »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Barrabruce
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 77
Location: Australia
Joined: Mar 30th, 2017
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #11 - Dec 31st, 2023 at 9:27am
Print Post  
O.K. Fellas I fully understand now.
I don’t know why I’ve had so much of a mental block with fillers and wads for so long as I have.
I have understood it I don’t know why it hasn’t sunk in.
Ha.

Boats ; the trouble is no one does such things around here anymore except me it appears and yes you are right about us young fellas reading old books and techniques from the past, as it is mostly our only reference or stuff we can find.
I end up with all sorts of crap ideas about stuff that was descovered and then debunked then re invented.


The question really regards the use in a 30-30 I have but the concept and the approach remains the same.

I don’t have to use a wad in my 30-20 + 1 grain case for good results.
When the world allows us to have some large pistol/small rifle powder I will get serious about some informal pb bullet shooting again.

My 310 cadet has been on a diet of adi 2207 for a while (too slow)and is remarkably accurate if I can load a case without becoming hung-up through the unburnt powder.
I blow into the throat like a black powder shooter would.

I’m on my way again happy as.
Thanks.

P.s.
Martini Belgian you were looking for smokeless loads for your 30-20 around abouts.
I have used bulleye a lot for 150-170 grain bullets.
Once the powder kicks in at 2.8 grains approx it has a nice zone of 0.1 increments where it just shoots well in my barrell.
I haven’t chronographed it but it must be around 960 fps.
It took a while to reach the 300 mtre gong but it was consistent.
I just used that load as it was easy on the shoulder ears and above all hip pocket.
You can see the  Scottish blood coming out in me now.
Ohh  those were the days of cheap primers too.

I will let you all be now.
I am tending to use softer and softer lube all the time.
I still believe in filling all the grooves in a bullet while I read you only need a wipe if at all in a certifiable match grade well lapped and seasoned barrell.


« Last Edit: Dec 31st, 2023 at 9:43am by Barrabruce »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7670
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #12 - Dec 31st, 2023 at 10:25am
Print Post  
I have a couple mid 1950s-1960s cast bullet publications that have a number of filler articles. I think it was Charlie Dell that first questioned the practice .   

From memory, will see if I can find the article, Col Hatcher in “Hatchers Notebook” published a piece about 30/06 with mid range loads being position sensitive . Again from memory the load was about 2200 fps used for international offhand matches at 300 yards. 1903 Springfields were stocked and fitted like a true Schuetzen for the matches. Was it called the Pan American match ? 

Way I handle less than full cases & cast bullets, Single shot or Lever action, is mount the gun exactly the same every shot.  I can take my 25/20 32/40 or 38/55 cast bullet rifles, sing,e shots  lightly changed with 4227,  Lever action 25/20 with Unique and shoot two groups, same hold on the target, that are noticeably different. One muzzle low to level other muzzle high to level. 

It’s possible fillers would cure it, but handing the rifle consistently is a key to good scores. Better to solve vertical stringing that way. 

Boats 

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 2040
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Wads...again. For 32-20 CPA
Reply #13 - Dec 31st, 2023 at 10:56am
Print Post  
Did Charlie's experiments include fillers as well as wads?

I have routinely been using powdered bran as a filler in 38-55 IMR4198 loads that are only 2/3 case or less.  No problems to date, but as with all these chamber ringing problems, it works until it doesn't.   

Not sure there's a huge advantage to the filler, but it does hold the wad against the bullet base when I use a wad, and I think I get a bit more consistent velocity variation for less vertical deviation at long range.

I'm normally a black powder shooter, so avoid most of these type of problems.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint