Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt (Read 12790 times)
tdmidget
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 52
Joined: Jan 21st, 2016
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #15 - Sep 9th, 2017 at 1:44pm
Print Post  
To cure your problem at the botleneck just make a single lip cutter, called a "D" reamer by some. Turn the exact profile of the cartridge and grind off slightly less than half. Harden, polish and feed slowly , peck often as there is very little room for chips. Done well it leaves a beautiful finish  and exact profile.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tdmidget
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 52
Joined: Jan 21st, 2016
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #16 - Sep 9th, 2017 at 1:45pm
Print Post  
To cure your problem at the bottleneck just make a single lip cutter, called a "D" reamer by some. Turn the exact profile of the cartridge and grind off slightly less than half. Harden, polish and feed slowly , peck often as there is very little room for chips. Done well it leaves a beautiful finish  and exact profile.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
corerftech
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Location: Memphis, TN
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2014
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #17 - Sep 9th, 2017 at 3:19pm
Print Post  
I have A2 and W1 and O1 for tool steel stock in correct diameter.
Which is best for a reamer of this type?
I know about it, just afraid to do it.... but since IM hacking old barrels right now, I can't hurt anything of value, just wasted time and I have time!

Please advise
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marlene
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 276
Joined: Oct 30th, 2015
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #18 - Sep 9th, 2017 at 5:14pm
Print Post  
A2 easiest to deal with for obvious reasons, but W1 will have the least surface decarburization, so use that if you're not going to knock off the surface after hardening. I never bother tempering these.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
craigd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2051
Location: midwest
Joined: Feb 22nd, 2009
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #19 - Sep 9th, 2017 at 10:43pm
Print Post  
Only thoughts. All three of those steels can be difficult to heat treat well. If it's heat up and dunk in used motor oil heat treating, O1 may be easier to do than W1. If you can control the environment, then you may get less distortion with A1, if you think you have some critical dimension that you'd like to maintain. Best of luck with it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1779
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #20 - Sep 10th, 2017 at 11:10pm
Print Post  
As was mentioned earlier, a 30 cal rimmed 300 BO 
of different lengths, and different shoulder lengths 
is easily done on 357Mag, or 357 Maxi brass with a
std set of Lee 300 BO dies.
Renting a 300 BO reamer could cut you a basic chamber body with the nice shoulder you are looking for.
For your purposes, you could then go in and recut the neck and leade with your 32 cal neck/throat reamer.
Viola, done.
See attached PIC of the 300BO(the rimless case near middle)
along with sized 357Mag, and two variants of sized 357Maxi-
One with long neck for long body cast bullets and the other
shorter neck for CBs such as the 311299.
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1779
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #21 - Sep 10th, 2017 at 11:11pm
Print Post  
Oh, a 30 carbine and a 3220 on left for comparison.
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
corerftech
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Location: Memphis, TN
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2014
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #22 - Sep 10th, 2017 at 11:41pm
Print Post  
Arnie: I missed the 30 carbine (even though I started a thread maybe a year ago re: making 32 long colt form 30 carbine). Checked the reamer print on 30 carbine at elk ridge.
The reamer cuts a .3386 at the font end.

Its the right length to do the neck and throat.

Its under sized a couple thou for the .325 bullet plus 38/357 neck at .0095

I need a conservative .348 neck

I can't find anything that suits that.

32-44 likely gets it there, but reamer is not long enough o get in to the neck region 

My custom neck/throat was set up for .339 (32-20 neck walls plus .323) and a tight neck.

I like the rimmed 300 BO though.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1779
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #23 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:31am
Print Post  
Actually, the 30 carbine case was only in my Pic for comparison,as is the 32-20.
Of course, as you have been doing, a person looks at
all available alternatives in doing such a chambering with minimal expense. Been there done that.
My main suggestion is indeed the rimmed 300 BO concept
that you might change to a rimmed 32 BO, short off 357Mag
or long off 357Maxi
Also, if one did this, you  would want to use a floating pilot 300BO reamer, with an appropriate "32" cal pilot in place.

beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1779
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #24 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:37am
Print Post  
I have been looking at the rimmed 300BO idea for a possible
30 cal  Schuetzen ctg off the readily available 357Mag or Maxi brass. I have a raft of 30 cal bullet molds to play with.
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4112
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #25 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 10:15am
Print Post  
Corerftech, I was told that when Charlie Dell designed his version of the 32/357 Mag he made his reamer from a straight taper reamer. Of course he was all about breech seating, but I'm told he made a fixed version of the cartridge by simply reaming the inside of the case neck to accept the bullet to the desired depth.   

If I were pursuing the cartridge you describe, And if I were only making one chamber and one forming die, I would probably use a tapered reamer for the cartridge body, then a straight reamer to get the neck section I wanted.  But then again, I'd probably be having somebody do it for me, so what do I know?  Cheesy

Froggie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3931
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #26 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 4:10pm
Print Post  
Don't ignore the 30-30 Wesson.  Made from a .357 Max, necked down (tapered) to .30 cal.  About the right capacity that is being discussed here.

AND is of histerically correct for those that are traditionalists.  (about 1880 vintage)   

  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
singleshot
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


I love singleshots!

Posts: 333
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #27 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 12:33am
Print Post  
A #7 taper pin reamer can be modified to make the 32/357 (Dell), or the same case on the maxi if the rear of the reamer is ground to ~.380-.

Willis
  

Willis Gregory, aka singleshot
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
corerftech
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Location: Memphis, TN
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2014
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #28 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 6:38pm
Print Post  
Made progress today on the project.

Finalized the shoulder location, neck length, dies process, neck dimension and bullet final sized diameter.
Case is 357 mag.
The bullet will be a .3275 at both bands, RCBS cadet 310-120 modified.
That will fill the .326 potential groove nicely.

The neck will be .3495 for insurance
The datum point is 1.000 from breach face
The shoulder and neck to be sized in an 8 nambu die with a .345 neck
Bullets are a slip fit in unmodified 357 mag cases, meaning they slip in under modest finger pressure w/o any sizing or dimensional changes to bullet until the top band is 50% inserted. Final seating is done with a 32-20 seater (for now).
No belling required.

8 nambu die FL sizer is capable of generating a taper crimp of any depth applicable but since there is the tiniest bit of neck tension which is adjustable with the lee universal expander plugs Ive turned to the Lyman M- Die profile to suit the needed neck, I can get it tighter very easy, should not need any crimp.

Testing when crimp was added, it sized almost a full .0005 from the base band and .001 from the froward band. Those are intolerable losses at this point since a custom mold with a proper located and dimensioned crimp groove is not avail.

So quasi Fl size is:
357 mag carbide for body.
8 nambu .344 neck
Custom made lee univ exp. plug at .328
seat with anything having the right stem the last .050
Crimp in 8 nambu FL size if needed.

Resize neck and push shoulder as needed with either 8 nambu basic or 8 nambu .344 (once ordered)

Ill order a manson .3495 neck reamer Monday.
Lathe bore the body easily single point with a goofy shoulder relief cut so its not sharp (ala Marlene suggestion)
Throat with a standard 8mm rifle throater.

Im close to shooting it (well sort of.)

Assembled rounds go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Bypassing the 32/40 variant for now, will return to it after move. Maybe it becomes a breach seat version since case capacity will be limited as fixed, compared to 357 mag bottle neck.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
corerftech
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Location: Memphis, TN
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2014
Re: My 32 cal x 357 mag fixed chamber and case attempt
Reply #29 - Feb 16th, 2018 at 12:15pm
Print Post  
I moved to TN since I started this thread and am still not settled, by a long shot. No machines are under power yet, but electrical is close to complete.

Was reviewing an 8mm RB represented a 8x33mm, doesn't exist. Well it does, the 7.92x33 Kurz, a cartridge I have heard of but never researched or reviewed. Holy Mackerel, its a perfect (nearly perfect) prototype cartridge for several reasons.

The Kurz is rimless but reviewing the dimensions, its actually a perfect 44-40 analog and the 44-40 is the perfect rimmed parent. Secondly, since it's OD is larger than .380, it can be used to form 38, 357M, 357MAX parented 8mm cartridges using an FL die. Apparently there is enough of a resurgence that Hornady produced a run of dies, cheap. I procured (on way) a set and will forge several 8mm wildcats using the die set and even the seater will be operable and proper. PTG has a reamer in stock, will have it altered to .379 body so that I can run as shallow or deep as I like for cartridges. At some point if a variant performs on the 38/357 body, Ill rent a KURZ reamer and attempt a 44-40 based rimmed variant that I can generate quick load data on.

A request, is there anyone with the Neconos QuickLoad software addition for designing cartridges that could generate a modified 7.92x33 Kurz file using a 38, 357, 357 max body (all three would be needed)???? Ill already be spending many bucks on reamer and several rollers for pressure testing (RSI system) and the extra $160 for the software addendum to my quick load is untimely. Ill post the same request in reloading on another thread.

Anyway, running QL on the real kurz cartridge with 165 gr lyman, I get about 19kpsi and 1800 fps (IIRC) on 17 grains of 4227 with a case cap of 29 gr of H20. I know that efficiency will go up radically on the smaller cases of 38 cal parents and density will near 100% which is optimal.

A question with a 19 degree holder as the Kurz forms, is it better to HS on rim or shoulder with this odd variant?? Should I form a 38 special (the minimum the die will draw) (regardless of the final dimensions settled on for reamer) to HS on rim with a loose shoulder so that I can set back a thou and use the rim seating flat to size after forming, or HS initially on shoulder tight?? The shoulder will be so small that its basically an Ackley as I intended initially. The shoulder is under .050 wide, its ultimately pretty SQUARE regardless of angle! Thanks for the feedback
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint