Page Index Toggle Pages: [1]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it (Read 31750 times)
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Dec 6th, 2016 at 1:18pm
Print Post  
Hi all, I was a member of ASSRA back in the 1990s, and shot my Shiloh in many regional and national matches in Raton, since we lived in New Mexico.  But I moved, got busy with family, and didn't really shoot single shots for the past 18 years or so.  Getting back into shooting now, and after I bought a 1930s Winchester 52 with Lyman Targetspot scope, I shot in a couple smallbore silhouette matches to get warmed up.   It's just as fun as it used to be, and I may get my daughter into sil also.  But ever since I was in my early 20s, I loved studying single shots like in the old "More Single Shot Rifles" books.  I ordered that Shiloh when I got out of the Navy, during the time of the 4+ year waits.  

This weekend I'm hoping to purchase a nice Stevens 44 1/2 Schuetzen rifle in .22. I've looked at it once, and it was so nice I'm going back for it.  I don't know the particular model, but have learned it should be stamped on the receiver face, where the forearm goes.   It's got checkered wood, hooked butt, all the trimmings that I can tell.  I'll confirm it's a 44 1/2 because I was too excited to do more than look at the rear screw near the wood...thinking that clinched it.  Now I'll look for the rounded top of the breachblock, and the ears of the block extending down when cocked.  Check the ejection/extraction (which would it be?) and a firing pin strike, is there anything else to check?  Thanks all.
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:32pm by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LONG RANGE
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 414
Location: CHERRY VALLEY, CA
Joined: Oct 3rd, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #1 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 2:26pm
Print Post  
AZ, I have no idea what rifle you are looking at or what the asking price is but from what you have stated you need to learn a bit more than you know at this time. I have a model 404 that was built on the 44-1/2  "0" frame. The "0" was stamped on the front of the action.The ladies model was also built on this frame. Mine has auto ejectors but not set triggers. It is very accurate but I rarely shoot it. I just prefer shooting larger calibers. My advise to you would be to do a bit more research before buying the rifle. I know there are many on this site who love single shot rifles, me included but we are in the minority. Attached is my 404.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #2 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 3:08pm
Print Post  
LONG RANGE wrote on Dec 6th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
AZ, I have no idea what rifle you are looking at or what the asking price is but from what you have stated you need to learn a bit more than you know at this time. I have a model 404 that was built on the 44-1/2  "0" frame. The "0" was stamped on the front of the action.The ladies model was also built on this frame. Mine has auto ejectors but not set triggers. It is very accurate but I rarely shoot it. I just prefer shooting larger calibers. My advise to you would be to do a bit more research before buying the rifle. I know there are many on this site who love single shot rifles, me included but we are in the minority. Attached is my 404.


Thanks.  Like you said, you don't know what it is, nor the asking price.  I know enough to know it's a deal. That's why I'm here, to get some specifics.  I've been collecting antique guns for 40 years.  Stevens seem to be less documented than many other obscure things I collect.  I do know values, and quality, and condition, and originality, and tang sights, and the Unertl scope on it.  I don't know the specific model (such as is it a 45, 52, etc), but it's a fine looking rifle, and has several fancy features.  

Your statement "I know there are many on this site who love single shot rifles, me included but we are in the minority." confuses me.  If this site and section isn't for questions on a single shot Stevens schuetzen rifle, I guess I'll ask at Rimfire Central.  But I always found the ASSRA back in the 90s was full of experts on these guns.  

To someone that knows Stevens:
1. Will the model number always be stamped at the front of the receiver?
2. Do the most .22 Stevens 44 1/2 frame rifles have ejectors? 
3. Most of the high end models have ring or loop levers.  This one has a standard S lever, does that mean it's a model 45 with fancy wood (it has a cheekpiece)?  Or a 51 or 52 with a "plain" lever?
4. It only has one trigger.  Did Stevens make a single, push-to-set, set trigger?

« Last Edit: Dec 6th, 2016 at 5:23pm by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3587
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #3 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 3:44pm
Print Post  
AZshot, I think he was just affirming that the site it the place for info about the single shot rifle. However, he probably also meant for you to give a few particulars to sort out the rifle, so's to avoid making any identification mistakes. Stick with these guys, they'll get ya going again soon. Welcome back, good to have ya.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #4 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 4:11pm
Print Post  
Sure, here is what I noticed when I first looked at it.

1. Premium walnut stock, with lots of figure.  Obviously original.
2. Checkering at pistol grip and forearm (I believe at front, anyway)
3. Carved cheek piece
4. Swiss buttplate, appears silver plated
5. Regular "S" or one finger lever
6. 2 barrels, both with matching serial numbers.  One in .22 LR, one .22 short.
7. Tang sight.  On this, I forgot to see if it was a Stevens.  Could have been another make, it had a fairly large eyepiece, certainly not a little Lyman with a small loop.   

I didn't take the forearm off.  I don't know how, nor how to take the barrel off.  I've read there is a locking  set screw, but I'm not touching that until I learn the technique.  But can the forearm come off by just taking a screw out?  Thanks!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
StevenHall
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 92
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Joined: Sep 23rd, 2014
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #5 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 4:40pm
Print Post  
Yes, just take the screw out and the forearm will come off. The screw for the barrel is the one at the bottom front of the receiver. Just take it out and unscrew the barrel. They are only hand tight.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LONG RANGE
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 414
Location: CHERRY VALLEY, CA
Joined: Oct 3rd, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #6 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 4:40pm
Print Post  
AZ, I am sorry if you found my remarks offensive. I was simply trying to say that if it were me I would try to be as informed as possible before buying any rifle. You asked some questions and I tried to be as helpful as I know how. I you want details about various models of any American mad single shot rifle, you can find no better source than the book, Single Shot Rifles by James Grant. It will give you no help as to value since it was written in the 1940s. I believe it is still be printing. Sorry again for the misunderstanding.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #7 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 5:01pm
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 6th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

But can the forearm come off by just taking a screw out? 

Removing the screw that holds the forearm to the bottom of the barrel will allow you to remove the forearm and then let you see the model number stamped in the face of the frame. The fancier/higher grade models regularly had a longer length forearm held to the bottom of the barrel using two screws.
You don't need to remove the barrel to see the model number that was stamped on the lower front of the frame.

AZshot wrote on Dec 6th, 2016 at 3:08pm:
 
1. Will the model number always be stamped at the front of the receiver?

Normally, yes. But exercise extreme caution because after the passage of so many years, some rifles have been built up by gun cranks who started with a lower grade model and added parts that came from other rifles to create what appears to be a fancier/higher grade model, so the number on the frame may not tell you the entire story.

2. Do the most .22 Stevens 44 1/2 frame rifles have ejectors?

Some do and some don't. If you look closely at the picture provided by Long Range, you will see a screw in the frame positioned slightly forward of the front of the breech block (his doesn't appear to have a domed head and may have been cut with a flat head to allow flush mounting of a receiver sight), which would indicate that particular frame started out with an ejector. If there is no screw in that position, it should use an extractor. 

3. Most of the high end models have ring or loop levers.  This one has a standard S lever, does that mean it's a model 45 with fancy wood (it has a cheekpiece)?  Or a 51 or 52 with a "plain" lever?

It's all guessing until you actually see the numbers on the front of the frame.

4. It only has one trigger.  Did Stevens make a single, put to set, set trigger?

Yes Stevens did make and offer a single-set trigger as an option.


The original Stevens basic 44 1/2 frame measures ~ 1 1/8" across the frame. The narrower 044 1/2 frame (and 56 Ladies Model) measures ~ 1" across the frame.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #8 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 5:21pm
Print Post  
Great! Thanks for the additional info.  So it sounds like I really have to ask the guy to let me remove the for-end, which I'll do.  Now that I'm in buying mode and will have cash with me, I'll have to really check it out carefully, but his price is good.  I think if I made a mistake, and it's just a model 44, I may back out.  But otherwise, the deal is on. I'll show it if I get it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2845
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #9 - Dec 6th, 2016 at 9:17pm
Print Post  
The front of the action will also have a small "0" in the lower corner.  The meaning is another Stevens mystery.  The front of the action may also have "EX" which means it was a special order of some sort.  To find out, all you need is a good screwdriver.

If it is a .22 rimfire, all the extras gained from the 44 1/2 action don't gain much, if anything.  I find the need to hold the hammer back a PITA when it comes to cleaning, etc.

I have shot a lot of Stevens 44s and one 44 1/2 in .22 rimfire.  Personally, and because it is a .22 rimfire, I would rather have the 44 than the upgrade.  I shoot a lot of .22 rimfires.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #10 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 12:49am
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Dec 6th, 2016 at 9:17pm:
I find the need to hold the hammer back a PITA when it comes to cleaning, etc...


Cleaning?  You clean "ordinary" (as opposed to the best BR barrels capable of one-hole groups at 50 yds) .22RFs?   

But I agree with your opinion of 44s, though that doesn't mean they're worth as much (in terms of filthy lucre) as 44-1/2s.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #11 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 7:23am
Print Post  
Thanks Waterman.  I take it the hammer of a 44.5 is in the line of the bore.  Could you take a piece of rubber surgical tubing, and "tie down" the hammer to clear the rod?

What other features of the 44 1/2 are not useful?  All I've gleaned is the frame is forged, versus cast.  To me, forged is slightly better because the steel is stronger than cast iron. Screwholes and internal fittings may not wallow out as fast.  I see the receiver is wider. The falling block may be stronger, but does it take more effort to open or something?  Does it not cam a cartridge into the bore, compared to the tilting action? Anything else that was changed? 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Travelor
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 132
Location: Central Arkansas
Joined: May 5th, 2008
Stevens 44 1/2 SST triggers
Reply #12 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 8:12am
Print Post  
You asked if original Stevens had a single set trigger. The answer is yes.  Way to check if it is on the gun you are contemplating is to push the trigger forward and see if it sets.

I have on on an original 28-30-120 model 44 1/2.  When I first got the gun it was working and was very nice.  It is currently not working and is at a gunsmith for repair.   

From what I have read, these triggers were very prone to stop working.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #13 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:53am
Print Post  
Thanks Traveler, I was thinking this morning about when I go see it, how hard I should push the trigger forward to test if it's a set type.  The ones I've played with in the past are only a few pounds, then you hear a click.  But like you said, I was worried about breaking something.  To me, that's the key for the purchase: the rifle has to work.  I do not want a shelf queen, I want a classic to shoot.  And gunsmiths are few today that really know their salt.  I'm going to take some empty .22 cases, and see if I get primer strikes and ejection too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Travelor
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 132
Location: Central Arkansas
Joined: May 5th, 2008
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #14 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 12:41pm
Print Post  
You are correct, setting the SST trigger only required a pound of two.

Mine still was able to be shot even without the SST being able to set.

If it does have a SST  and you need it worked on Lee Shaver is knowledgeable on these triggers and a very good craftsman.  That is who has mine now.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #15 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 12:55pm
Print Post  
If it's a single set trigger there will be an adjustment screw behind the trigger. No screw, it's not a set trigger. You can't push too hard on a SST. At least not hard enough to damage anything. It may take 8-10 lbs. force to set it, but likely less.
Great deal of price difference between a 44.5 and a 44, so a great price on a 44.5 might be too high on a 44. Lots of Schuetzen type rifles have been reworked, and some done very nicely, so be careful to inspect it all closely. I would be almost certain that one of the barrels wont be matched to the receiver, but if both barrels have matching serial numbers it will add immensely to the value. Would be very rare for a buyer to order two barrels in .22lR and .22 Short.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #16 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 2:19pm
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:53am:
And gunsmiths are few today that really know their salt...


And those "few" are usually buried in work!  So unless you have a personal friend in the trade, anticipate many months of waiting.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Nessmuk
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 65
Location: Tug Hill
Joined: Dec 5th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #17 - Dec 7th, 2016 at 4:14pm
Print Post  
Unless you are shooting black powder, leave the barrel alone and use good will or S&K ammo with waxed bullets.  I do so in my anshultz to avoid any chamber or crown wear.
  

If everything's looking up,
You're on the bottom.
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #18 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 10:32am
Print Post  
OK, I'm prepared to go either get it, or pass, depending on what it is.   

I thought I could gauge prices on guns pretty well, but Stevens are not easy.  And I've never really followed them.  I see some nice ones that look similar on the "George" website and others asking for above $3,000 for most.  Then I see this one sell on Gunbroker for only $1500  (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) .  So now I'm getting scared I may pay too much.  His price is firm, he just reminded me, mid way between $2k and $3K.  It does have 2 barrels with matching serial numbers and an Unertl scope on one, and a tang sight.  Can someone tell me if these assumptions are correct:

- If it's a Ladies, the preferred model is 56 over 55, with the 044 1/4 action.
- If it's a 55, I should pass on it?
- If it's a Ladies based on the Favorite, it's still preferable over the 55?
- If it's some other model on a 44 1/2, it should be bought.
- If it's a 44 action, I should pass on it at that price?   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #19 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 10:50am
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 10:32am:
OK, I'm prepared to go either get it, or pass, depending on what it is.  

I thought I could gauge prices on guns pretty well, but Stevens are not easy.  And I've never really followed them.  I see some nice ones that look similar on the "George" website and others asking for above $3,000 for most.  Then I see this one sell on Gunbroker for only $1500  (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) .  So now I'm getting scared I may pay too much.  His price is firm, he just reminded me, mid way between $2k and $3K.  It does have 2 barrels with matching serial numbers and an Unertl scope on one, and a tang sight.  Can someone tell me if these assumptions are correct:

- If it's a Ladies, the preferred model is 56 over 55, with the 044 1/4 action.
- If it's a 55, I should pass on it?
- If it's a Ladies based on the Favorite, it's still preferable over the 55?
- If it's some other model on a 44 1/2, it should be bought.
- If it's a 44 action, I should pass on it at that price?  


The 44 on GB has a non-original lever, tang sight, and because it's not checkered, probably a non-original fore-arm.  Seller said nothing about matching ser. nos., so maybe the barrel is replaced. Relined is not as good as an excellent original bore, but better than an original pitted bore, which it would probably have if not relined.

One more thing: if the seller bought it directly from Jim Goergen, odds are he paid way too much!

All that said, the price of the one on GB may not be out of line, if it REALLY has a first-class relining job.

Simply not possible to appraise the gun you're interested in without a good photo!
« Last Edit: Dec 8th, 2016 at 10:56am by Redsetter »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #20 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 11:43am
Print Post  
I know, gosh I wish I'd asked to take photos.  I was trying to be respectful, they were his dads guns, and he'd passed only a year before.  He also said he was not in a hurry to sell, but I noted he had taken it to a local gun shop already to get an idea of what they'd  sell it for on commission.  I wanted to move quickly, but not act too excited.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #21 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 11:55am
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 11:43am:
I know, gosh I wish I'd asked to take photos.  I was trying to be respectful, they were his dads guns, and he'd passed only a year before...


Good Lord, how could it be "disrespectful" to snap a photo of something the man is trying to sell! 

Based on my experience in a number of similar situations, I can just about promise you the guy's got an exaggerated notion of what they're worth; maybe not, but IF not, he's an exception to the general rule. 


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #22 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:17pm
Print Post  
I've met several sellers that are old school.  I buy a LOT of antiques.  They don't want someone to come in and say "I might buy your gun, but let me take pictures, go to the internet and library, research if your price is in my favor, and then I'll come back."  Many are 'take it or leave it' sellers.  I bought a Winchester 52 with a Lyman Targetspot scope like that.  The guy told me stories of other potential buyers pulling the "I need to research it" line.  He was not amused, and would not sell to them. It does one of two things.  It shows you are unaware of the values, or it causes them to be curious and go looking it up more thoroughly themselves.  You basically scare them off.  Instead of doing all that, I went in very prepared and knew the $600 was a great price for that 52 and scope (duh!).  Same with a Colt Pre-war ACE (in box, 99%) I bought from a guy.  If I had acted coy or excited to research the price, the pistol would have gone from $1200 to $2500 next time I met him.  Honey holes are sometimes guarded by crotchety gatekeepers.   

This seller is the same way.  He is on the cusp of not selling his dad's guns.  He gave me a list with prices of 20 guns.  99% were overpriced.  I picked one, a Winchester, that was very nice and priced right.  I passed on the others, many quite rare and mint condition antique guns.  Later, he realized he priced it too low, probably.  Hence, last night when setting up to meet again, he said "I've been checking and my price is good, some say too low..."  If I dork around with asking for pictures, he knows what I'm doing.  I have to bite the bullet and buy...or pass. You play around with these guys and the next call they say "I've decided not to sell..or..I found another guy that offered me $500 more on the spot...sorry" etc. I've been wheeling and dealing for a very long time....I know what I'm doing.  Just not the price of this gun give or take $700 or so.  I prefer to be give or take $100 in my estimates.
« Last Edit: Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:26pm by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #23 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 8:44pm
Print Post  
Well I both buy and sell a fair number of antique single shot rifles, and the only thing I ask people to avoid in pictures is the serial number. I have nothing to hide, and sometimes the buyer may not be really savvy, and does indeed want to investigate further, or show the pictures to a friend who is better versed.
If a gun is indeed a very good price, I wouldn't take pictures, or delay in making an offer on it. I know when I've taken time to mull over a decent price on a gun, it's rarely there when I return to buy it. 
And anyone who took more than two seconds to decide if a Win 52 with Lyman Targetspot was worth $600 doesn't deserve to own it. That wouldn't have bought that combo 20 years ago, unless it was a real beater.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #24 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 8:51pm
Print Post  
I don't really think he would have cared if I asked to take photos.  But I was trying to play it cool, having just bought that Winchester off him.  And I've missed many guns over the years by waiting "to think about it" too.  

Once, in New Mexico, before the internet was very big in the 1990s, a guy was advertising a Ballard in the local Dandy Dime paper.  I called him, and he brought it over to my house.  At the time, I had my Shiloh, a Trapdoor, and not much else.  But i'd been oogling all the obscure single shots in all the classic books for 10 or more years.  He arrived at the door with the rifle, a mid-range of some sort, with a tang sight and Marbles flip front.  It was in a good caliber, and had a ring lever. It was his grandfather's.  I loved it, he wanted $900.  As I started to negotiate, my wife started mouthing "we can't afford it..." to me.  We'd only been married 2-3 years.  I stalled, trying to think of a way to come up with "non-family money", and it was sold a few days later.  

After that and a few others, I learned to jump when the price is right, like the Win 52 I got a year ago.  That was another guy, retired, and I'd seen the rifle a few years before and told him if he ever wanted to sell it, call me.  Ironically, my wife was with me this time too, when I bumped into him in town.  He said he knew I wanted it, and would give me a really good price.  I figured $1500 or so.  I said I just didn't have the money.  He kept coaxing me, and finally said, "how about $600?"  I drove over, left the wife in the car, and got it!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #25 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 10:45am
Print Post  
Can't say as I've ever regretted a gun I bought. But I've got a bunch of guns I regret not buying! If I'm unsure if a gun is a good buy I will always pass. Occasionally I find out later I missed a really good buy. But I'd rather regret missing a gun than regret buying something I'm later stuck with, stuck selling for less than I paid.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Quarter_Bore
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 817
Location:   
Joined: Dec 16th, 2005
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #26 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:05pm
Print Post  
To add to StevenHall's response on removing the barrel. Before you can unscrew the barrel you will need to open the action so the extractor will be clear of the extractor slot in the barrel. Believe it or not I have owned takedown single shots that were hammered on the receiver ring by a former owner who did not know he had to open the action to get the barrel to unscrew.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #27 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:18am
Print Post  
Quarter_Bore wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:05pm:
Believe it or not I have owned takedown single shots that were hammered on the receiver ring by a former owner who did not know he had to open the action to get the barrel to unscrew.


I have no trouble believing that, because the "world-famous" Shilen Barrel Co. broke the extractor when removing the brl from a 1922 Springfield I sent them to be rebarreled, and also ruined the original barrel by tearing out a big chip at the extractor cut.   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #28 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:29am
Print Post  
Wow, that's a shame.  Thanks for the tip, I'm usually pretty careful when working on my antique guns,  and might have figured out to lower the action.  But I'm thankful you told me!   

So today is the day!  I figured out the scope is an 18X Unertl.  So that is way after the period, as I knew Unertls were.  Would it lower the value, that there is a 1950s scope and blocks on one of the barrels?  Would you replace the Unertl with an older Fecker or such?  I think I would.  But where to put the nice Unertl?!

I'll let yall know if I get it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #29 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 10:05am
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:29am:
But where to put the nice Unertl?!

 


Ebay.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #30 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 10:15am
Print Post  
Any Unertl scope would be an added value to the Stevens. It wouldn't detract from it's value even if it is 1950's era. If you indeed wanted to find an old Stevens scope to have on a Stevens rifle, it might cost whatever you sold the Unertl for, or at least close to it. But depending on which Stevens scope, you may pocket some difference.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #31 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 11:02am
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 10:15am:
If you indeed wanted to find an old Stevens scope to have on a Stevens rifle, it might cost whatever you sold the Unertl for, or at least close to it. But depending on which Stevens scope, you may pocket some difference.


Before ebay and the internet, the very few Stevens scopes that showed up at gun shows were always priced like "museum pieces."  But when pickers & others began listing them on ebay, it became apparent that a lot more had survived than I'd previously believed, and the prices got a lot more realistic.  Not that you don't still see them listed at ridiculous prices--right now there are two on ebay that have been listed for months with no takers.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #32 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:43pm
Print Post  
I bought one last Spring on Gunbroker for about $350, in very good condition. It's not a top-line model, though. I've been watching for years, and that's the only one that's ever come up.  No other bidders.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #33 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:46pm
Print Post  
It really depends on the Stevens scope model and length. The shorter Stevens scopes like around 17" versions 248, 268, 331, 338, etc. can be found with good optics and straight tubes for $250-$325. 
But the longer the tube, and the older the model, the prices jump quickly. Condition can also make huge leaps with all old scopes, so a Stevens with perfect optics and excellent condition will bring easily 50% or more over average scopes.
The long 26"-32" will get double what the short Stevens get in equal condition. People love the old long scopes in decent shape, or any complete shape!
I buy old external adjustment scopes often, and rarely see the Stevens come up for sale in nice condition, and good glass. When I see them they're usually kinda beat. I picked up two long Stevens scopes this year. One at a match in Eastern Washington with 30" tube for what I felt was a bargain at $700, and another good buy on a 24" tube for $500 with brand new optics, and in excellent outside condition.
Often I have to buy an old gun to get a deal on a nice scope, and then sell the gun to recoup the difference.
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:52pm by marlinguy »  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #34 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:58pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:43pm:
I bought one last Spring on Gunbroker for about $350, in very good condition. It's not a top-line model, though. I've been watching for years, and that's the only one that's ever come up.  No other bidders.   


Excellent price, but you're looking in the wrong place!  Ebay is where you should be looking.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #35 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 3:25pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 2:46pm:

The long 26"-32" will get double what the short Stevens get in equal condition. People love the old long scopes in decent shape, or any complete shape!


True, but the irony of this is that Stevens long scopes, the Favorite models, were the cheapest in their line and had the crudest mounts!  Their one and only advantage was easy mounting by use of existing sight slots. 

The two you mentioned were excellent buys, but I really don't like using them (i.e., hunting or otherwise walking around with the gun in your hands) on anything heavier than a Favorite, or other short-barreled gun in the 4 lb. or under weight class.  Only one I still have is mounted on a #3, 30" brl, and it's too clumsy to be anything but a bench gun.  It's 32", the longest Stevens made, but that's still 2" too short for a 30" brl.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #36 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 5:58pm
Print Post  
Most the early Stevens were built by others. Cataract or Malcolm, so they used their mounts. The late 1890's #1 mount was indeed crude, as it didn't even have windage adjustment. But the #2 or #3 mounts were pretty nice 3 point mounts. The Malcolm mounts were even nicer. The "Favorite" #1 was a much later mount, not coming into use until Stevens started their own scope making around 1905. 
Both of my long Stevens scopes are on .22 caliber Ballard rifles. One on an early flat top #3 and the other on a late concave top #3. The flat top got the shorter scope as it had been D&T for a scope sometime in it's life and I never could find the right length until I stumbled on the Stevens. The other #3 got the long scope mounted in the factory dovetails.
For .22RF rifles these old Stevens are a wonderful scope, and I really enjoy how they work, and even more so how they look. 
I have another old Stevens 32" scope that is fitted with Malcolm long range rear mount. Haven't found the right gun to put it on yet, but it will certainly be a larger bore CF chambering. Likely .32-40 or .38-55 caliber. I have a very nice #4 Perfection Ballard in .32-40 with a full octagon 26" barrel, and I think the 32" Stevens scope would be long enough for that gun.
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2016 at 6:05pm by marlinguy »  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #37 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 7:16pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 5:58pm:
Most the early Stevens were built by others. Cataract or Malcolm, so they used their mounts...


You've been grossly mislead (perhaps by some of the malarkey about Stevens made up out of whole cloth by John Campbell?).  Stevens purchased the assets of the defunct Cataract Co. at a bankruptcy sale in 1901, so it would have been impossible for Cataract to have mfg. Stevens scopes, and by mid-1902 were advertising their new scopes in Shooting & Fishing. The first (lavish) Stevens' catalog appeared in 1903, which you can buy in a cheap Cornell reprint (which doesn't begin to match the beauty of the original, however).

"Favorite" was the only model name ever applied to the long scope, and although its mounts went through several improvements over the years, "No. 1" was the only designation applied to them from 1903 until the last catalog under Savage ownership, which you can confirm in Cornell's reprints of these later catalogs. The ends of the adjustment screws on my No. 1 were so "un-flat" they worked like cams until I squared them off, and the lack of a binding screw in the rear mount means they can be accidentally moved.

I don't doubt Stevens scopes wound up in Malcolm mounts, either because the buyer preferred a fixed rather than sliding mount, or just wanted to use mounts he already owned; likewise, you see Feckers in Stevens mounts, Unertls in Lyman mounts, etc.  But there's no reason to believe Malcolm ever supplied mounts to Stevens when Stevens was mfg. their own in several variations, and in fact the Malcolm Co. was on a downhill trajectory by the time Stevens introduced their first scopes.  The best "asset" Stevens acquired in that bankruptcy auction was the services of F. L. Smith, the most talented scope builder of his time, so they most certainly had no need to "borrow" from the fading Malcolm Co.
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2016 at 7:22pm by Redsetter »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #38 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:01pm
Print Post  
I got it!  Measured the receiver width, it's a 044 1/2 action.  I started to have a hunch it was a Ladies model, and told the seller that I'd know if it had a 56 under the fore end.  I took it off, and there it was, a 56 stamped.  I also noted the wood had a stamped serial number that matches the others.  The trigger strap, and BOTH barrels have the same serial number.  It has a Lyman rear site, and I'm not sure what kind of globe front with apertures.  The Unertl is on the 24 inch .22 LR barrel, which seems like a heavy configuration.  It is about 11/16 dia at the muzzle.  You can barely see the .22 Short barrel beside my shooting box.  It has a 26 inch barrel, lighter configuration.  The front sight doesn't appear to have any markings.   

More pictures when the light comes up.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Longdistance1
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 432
Location: Amidon, ND
Joined: Feb 11th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #39 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:18pm
Print Post  
It looks like you did Well!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #40 - Dec 10th, 2016 at 9:57pm
Print Post  
Gorgeous--worth whatever you paid for it, and then some. The Unertl, superb optical qualities notwithstanding, seems out of place, but you can probably sell it for considerably more than the cost of something that's a better period match.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #41 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 7:42am
Print Post  
Thanks both.  As I was looking at the sight, I got another surprise.  It's not a No. 2, it's a Lyman 103 Wind Guage.  I see those are pretty collectible too.  On scopes, this one does have blocks for the Unertl, and one open dovetail.  Not being a scope guy, I'm wondering how ugly the barrel will be if I remove the blocks.  Are they drilled/tapped in?  Then I could put some headless screws in, that wouldn't be too bad.  The .22 short barrel has some filled holes too. As I'm getting older, maybe a scope would be good. 

I would want a scope that has reasonable optics, even if not exactly 1916 period.  Perhaps a Winchester B5?  I have a couple of Mossbergs, from generations later (1940s), and a Weaver B6.  They are horrible little scopes compared to my Lyman Targetspot Jr, and this Unertl.  What's a good scope, from the 1920s period that would look better, but actually work for small bore silhouette?  A Fecker?

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2016 at 7:48am by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #42 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 8:42am
Print Post  
Man, this just keeps getting better!  Like when I was a little kid, sneaking down to the Christmas tree, I got up before dawn (like every morning actually) and took a look at the rifle again.  Just now, I held it up and felt how steady it feels at my shoulder (and how small that swiss buttplate is on my arm!).  

Then I remembered the one thing I never checked - does it have a set trigger?  I pulled it down off my shoulder and rotated it to see the trigger.  I remember one of you saying set ones have a screw, and had seen a picture. I see a gap, and a screw, could it be?!  I cocked it, and pushed the trigger forward, with anticipation.  CLICK!  It has a set trigger!
Thanks for all your help and expertise, which as I knew, I'd not find anywhere else on these uncommon ones.  Range report soon!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #43 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:09am
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 7:42am:
I would want a scope that has reasonable optics, even if not exactly 1916 period.  Perhaps a Winchester B5?  I have a couple of Mossbergs, from generations later (1940s), and a Weaver B6.  They are horrible little scopes compared to my Lyman Targetspot Jr, and this Unertl.  What's a good scope, from the 1920s period that would look better, but actually work for small bore silhouette?  A Fecker?



If you're talking about MVA's B5, that's a good choice--an "old" scope with modern optics; the original is not a good optical design (excessive eye relief), even if you don't mind the time & cost to obtain one. An original Stevens 368, or similar model, is a better scope, and could be found if you're patient and diligent in searching internet sites.  Even a '20s Fecker will not compare optically with the Unertl, so be prepared to accept somewhat lesser optical performance.

Frankly, I think this beautiful piece is FAR too fine to subject to the rigors of any kind of organized competition, where, no matter how careful you'd be in handling it, shit happens.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #44 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:16am
Print Post  
Yeah, it's a beaut.  I just got enough light to get a good shot of the wood.  Mighty fine, the guy that sold it had a dark interior to his house.  I could see it was good wood, but not enough to really see it. By rigors of competition, do you mean guys sitting behind the line in tweed sports coats, smoking cigars, and talking as they clean their Ballards and Maynards for the next round?  It's still like that isn't it?  Also, could you see my next post/page, question on the best hammer position for opening these. 

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:24am by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #45 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:20am
Print Post  
Redsetter, could you explain the proper way to handle this action?  I've been going to full cock on the hammer, then opening the block.  Because when I'm at "hammer down" or half cock, I can see the hammer start to move, and hear a few clicks, when starting to lower the lever.  That's why I was asking, are these meant to self cock?  Or go to half cock when opened?  I just don't want to break it, and it seems from full cock it's opening smoother with fewer internal "noises".  The lever and action seems fine, it's held up nice and snug when closed and all.  Just want to learn the "course of fire" for these before range day (today)!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RSW
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
Joined: Sep 8th, 2006
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #46 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:27am
Print Post  
AZshot
That's a really nice rifle you have acquired.
If you are located in Az, we have a small but active Schuetzen Verein that meets at Ben Avery Shooting Facility (BASF) north of Phoenix.
On Dec 17 we will have an all day practice session at the BASF bench rest range. There should be several of our guys shooting 22RF. You and your new rifle will fit right in with with our group.
You are welcome (as is anyone) to come out and join us. Email or PM me and I can provide more details and 2017 schedule.
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:35am by RSW »  

Randy W
ASSRA 10211  -  ISSA 125
There are indeed two Americas. Simply put, it is not the haves and have nots. The two Americans are in reality divided into those who do and those who don't.
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #47 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:38am
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Dec 10th, 2016 at 7:16pm:
[quote author=262A392722252C3E324B0 link=1481048312/36#36 date=1481410708]

You've been grossly mislead (perhaps by some of the malarkey about Stevens made up out of whole cloth by John Campbell?). .


I'm uncertain how I've been grossly mislead? Prior to Stevens purchase of Cataract they did indeed purchase scopes from Cataract. Since they offered scopes long before they purchased Cataract, I can't see how those scopes simply appeared in their catalog without Cataract or someone else making  them.
As for the mounts from Malcolm, I have no idea how they ended up on my Stevens scope, since over 100 years anything could  happen. I wasn't saying they came from Stevens with Malcom mounts, but Stevens did offer both Malcolm made scopes and their mounts prior to having their own scope business.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #48 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:48am
Print Post  
That's a gorgeous Stevens you've purchased AZshot! The condition is fantastic, and having scope and two barrels is great! Not many Stevens built with single set triggers, so that's an unusual option on your gun! 
Of course you could shoot it in competition, but it is always a risk of a bump or ding every time you take a  gun out, so "rigorous" competitive shooting just means you're going to be shooting it a lot, so more chances to bump it.
I always lower the block with the hammer down. Not sure it matters on a Stevens, but it's safer to raise the block on a live round with the hammer down.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #49 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 11:29am
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:38am:


I'm uncertain how I've been grossly mislead? Prior to Stevens purchase of Cataract they did indeed purchase scopes from Cataract.


Of course--any perusal of an early Stevens catalog will document that fact; but that (to refresh your memory) was not what you previously SAID: "Most the early Stevens were built by others. Cataract or Malcolm, so they used their mounts."

Am I wrong to infer a considerable difference between "built by" and "purchase from"?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #50 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 11:39am
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:48am:

Of course you could shoot it in competition, but it is always a risk of a bump or ding every time you take a  gun out, so "rigorous" competitive shooting just means you're going to be shooting it a lot, so more chances to bump it.


This is the danger--you're distracted by the commotion going on all around you, and none of the crowd at such an event are going to be looking out for your gun.

About 30 yrs ago I traveled to a BP silhouette competition thinking it might be something I'd like to do with one of my precious original Ballards; five minutes observation of the dust clouds produced as shooters shook out their shooting mats, along with the general commotion, was all needed to see to convince me otherwise!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #51 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 12:02pm
Print Post  
Hmm, when I shot at the BPCR matches in Raton, it was very calm and collected.  Many people were shooting custom Ballards, Hepburns, and such, with custom AAA grade wood and fantastic finishes.  Some original, some customs by Ron Long, Steve Garbe, and all those before anyone every heard of "Turnbull."  I never saw it later if it became chaotic, this was back in the 1990s, when only about 300 people would shoot the Nationals. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens
Reply #52 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 12:32pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 11:29am:
marlinguy wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 10:38am:


I'm uncertain how I've been grossly mislead? Prior to Stevens purchase of Cataract they did indeed purchase scopes from Cataract.


Of course--any perusal of an early Stevens catalog will document that fact; but that (to refresh your memory) was not what you previously SAID: "Most the early Stevens were built by others. Cataract or Malcolm, so they used their mounts."

Am I wrong to infer a considerable difference between "built by" and "purchase from"?


My mistake. I meant to say most of the early scopes offered by Stevens were Cataract or Malcom.  Sorry I miss typed that, which appeared like I meant they were Stevens marked. wasn't what I was trying to infer.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #53 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 12:38pm
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 12:02pm:
Hmm, when I shot at the BPCR matches in Raton, it was very calm and collected.  Many people were shooting custom Ballards, Hepburns, and such, with custom AAA grade wood and fantastic finishes.  Some original, some customs by Ron Long, Steve Garbe, and all those before anyone every heard of "Turnbull."  I never saw it later if it became chaotic, this was back in the 1990s, when only about 300 people would shoot the Nationals. 


Like anything else, what someone chooses to do with their collectible guns is their choice. I have people tell me I'm crazy to hunt with my old Ballard rifles, as I could fall and damage one. I choose to take that chance, as I want to enjoy mine as they were intended. I have no problem hunting, or competing with a nice old original, and not trying to discourage you either. Just telling you that it does open up the possibility of bumps and dings. 
I'm pretty sure all of my old Ballards have been shot often by previous owners, so my doing the same is OK by me.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rebel
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4292
Location: Rockets and Race Cars
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #54 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 1:46pm
Print Post  
I agree with Vall.
It's the same for people who restore old cars to better than original and trailer them to shows, take them home and wash and wax everything including the chassis.
The rifles are meant to be shot and the cars to be driven.
More power to you if you just collect and never shoot, I don't shoot much myself.
But it's not because I'm afraid to use my best rifle, where's the fun in that?
Aaron
  

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3587
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #55 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 1:50pm
Print Post  
If you plan to shoot it, leave the scope it has now- it's better than the older ones anyhow, and might have been added as an update while the gun was still in ordinary use. 
The gun in the field never bothered me. I've taken valuable rifles hunting and always to the range. It's what they're for, ain't it?
Finally, you sure got a nice one there. Merry Christmas.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #56 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
AZshot wrote on Dec 11th, 2016 at 12:02pm:
Hmm, when I shot at the BPCR matches in Raton, it was very calm and collected.  Many people were shooting custom Ballards, Hepburns, and such, with custom AAA grade wood and fantastic finishes.  Some original, some customs by Ron Long, Steve Garbe, and all those before anyone every heard of "Turnbull." 


New $5000 guns, or originals that have been "customized," or originals in beater condition...no problem.  But a very rare gun in apparently immaculate condition is quite a different proposition, I think.

Hunting in good terrain (not scaling cliffs, for ex.) in good weather (i.e., not in a rain or snow storm) is far less hazardous, I think, because there are no other people around to distract you, like the guy who started talking to me while I was loading my boat at a public boat launch, causing me to go off and leave a $1000 bamboo rod that was gone when I went back to look for it.  I've hunted with many of my prized antique guns, though none of them, I have to say, in such beautiful condition as your Stevens.

I remember Doug from the time he'd rent one or two tables to display his work at the formerly great Syracuse show, where many fine SSs showed up...30+ yrs ago!  Had a feeling that lad was going places!

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #57 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 3:27pm
Print Post  
For me the only difference in whether I shoot, hunt, or use a gun, is it's condition. Even the most pristine and rare guns I own get shot and occasionally hunted with. But I wont take one of the nicest out in inclement weather, when I can grab one that's less valuable.
As Aaron said, it's the same for my old cars. I have one I wont drive in nasty weather, but the others are all fair game in anything but ice or snow.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #58 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 4:26pm
Print Post  
Well, shooting it is a done deal.  My daughter and I just got back from the range, where we had quite a good time shooting this old beauty.  The set trigger is nice, not too light, perhaps a pound or two.  The first two shots were almost on top of each other, but at short range to check the scope.  It was close enough, so I shot the rest of the time at 50 yards.  It seems very accurate, but there was a coming and going cross breeze.  About 1.2" groups.  

My 22 year old daughter seems to have shot better than me.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2016 at 5:05pm by AZshot »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16276
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #59 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 7:57pm
Print Post  
Sure looks like a keeper AZshot! I'd probably leave that scope on it myself, as it's a much better choice (if you plan to shoot it) than any other scope would be.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3587
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #60 - Dec 11th, 2016 at 8:15pm
Print Post  
Way to go Amelia! AZ, you done good too.  Smiley Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #61 - Dec 12th, 2016 at 12:01pm
Print Post  
Thanks, I'll tell her!

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #62 - Dec 15th, 2016 at 11:52am
Print Post  
Now the fun really begins,   testing to find the "right" ammo (and buying as much of it as possible), learning all about "conditions", all the tools nick-necks and bench gear. etc etc etc 

welcome to the madness, Cheesy Cheesy  enjoy the company of cranks, nuts and passionate enthusiasts. Shocked
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
watchthewind
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 955
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Joined: Mar 10th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #63 - Dec 15th, 2016 at 4:55pm
Print Post  
Garrett I'm glad you picked this up. I look forward to seeing it in person one day.
BTW- I'll be working down your way Mon-Thurs. next week. Perhaps we can meet up for dinner.
Take Care,
Scott
  

ASSRA Member # 11408
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #64 - Dec 20th, 2016 at 9:19am
Print Post  
See you tomorrow Scott!

Here it is with the light, .22 Short barrel.  I wanted to play with the 103 tang sight, it's pretty neat.  The rifle feels totally different, this much lighter.  I need to weigh it with both barrels, but all the "ladies" in my house seemed to like it better with the light barrel installed. 

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
watchthewind
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 955
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Joined: Mar 10th, 2015
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #65 - Dec 20th, 2016 at 10:42pm
Print Post  
Man Garrett you did well, what a nice rifle! It was great meeting up and doing dinner. I look forward to shooting with you.
Scott
  

ASSRA Member # 11408
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AZshot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Location: Desert Southwest
Joined: Nov 29th, 2016
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #66 - Dec 21st, 2016 at 7:51pm
Print Post  
It was a pleasure meeting you too Scott, you are a testament to the continuation of gentlemen target shooters.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kcajeel
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 170
Location: Manistee, Mi.
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2010
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #67 - Feb 10th, 2017 at 12:07pm
Print Post  
It was a pleasure to read the whole story of the purchase of this rifle. What interesting commentary and beautiful pictures. The only thing I wish for is a better picture of the single set trigger. They are scarce as "hens teeth". I've never seen the Stevens single sets.

Thanks, 
Jack
  

jack
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Introduction and a Stevens - UPDATE got it
Reply #68 - Feb 10th, 2017 at 4:10pm
Print Post  
Beautiful Rifle!
Truer words could not have been spoken about Scott he is a tremendous blessing to the sport and one who's ongoing efforts I truly do admire.

Yours Sincerely
John Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 
Send TopicPrint