Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Knox/Nock's ?? (Read 1654 times)
rgchristensen
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1111
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2014
Knox/Nock's ??
Aug 21st, 2015 at 1:45pm
Print Post  
    Several years ago, there was a discussion of this on Milsurps.com Forum, with no resolution of the controversy.
    FWIW, the 1904 British Military "Textbook of Small Arms" calls it "Knox form".  Anybody ever SEE a NOCK firearm with such an excrescence on it?   Anybody know of some authoritative attribution?

CHRIS
RGChristensen
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3925
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: Knox/Nock's ??
Reply #1 - Aug 21st, 2015 at 2:43pm
Print Post  
from The Modern Shooter by Captain Lacy published 1842:
The neatest and best form of barrel for all single guns is
what is called " a Nock's form" barrel, or one which is flat
both at the sides and top of the breech, instead of being circular,
like the rest of the barrel.*
Let your duck-gun stocks be made of good, well-seasoned,
walnut wood, the less veined the better, for figure is no object
here ; and, as I have before observed, the plainest are generally
the strongest stocks, and are, therefore, the best adapted
* You cannoi well keep a round barrel in a vice, and no clams will hold
properly to turn the breech out. A single barrel, especially a large one,
should always be "Nock's form." Moreover, a round barrel does not make
near so good a finish in workmanship.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint