Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Powder (Read 2740 times)
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1827
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Powder
May 5th, 2006 at 6:22pm
Print Post  
What the heck was semi-smokeless powder that was used in the past to shoot some of those small groups??  DWS, maybe someone could write an article for the journal on those old powders that were available around the turn of the 19th century. Smiley  I think it would be very interesting!  Bob Saathoff
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schutzenbob
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Rheinisch-Westfälisc
hen Sprengstoff-Fabriken

Posts: 2282
Location: Nightingale, California
Joined: Oct 24th, 2005
Re: Powder
Reply #1 - May 5th, 2006 at 7:11pm
Print Post  
The Powder you're probably referring to was "King's Semi-Smokeless" which was a popular powder but was very corrosive. Also, the primers at the turn of the last century (also corrosive) didn't have enough power to properly ignite it, so shooters had to use a duplex load of a few grains of black powder and the main charge of semi-smokeless, other powders such as "Schuetzen" also required a priming charge of black. Some of the old Am. Rifleman articles by Ned Robert refer to this type of loading.

Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Powder
Reply #2 - May 5th, 2006 at 11:03pm
Print Post  
Semi-smokeless was a composition of sulphur, saltpeter, charcoal and nitrated cotton linters.  According to all the sources I've read, it seems to have been the stuff that gave "gunpowder" its popular reputation of being extremely dangerous.  Semi-smokeless had both the quick deflagrating qualities of black powder and the instability of the early smokeless powders.  It was apparently very static sensitive; there were warnings not to use it during thunderstorms, not to shake the can, etc.  It was very accurate in the smaller calibers, not only compared to black powder, but in .22 rimfire was more accurate than even the early smokeless powder loadings.  When that situation finally changed, Winchester dropped Lesmok and Peters dropped King's Semi-Smokeless with a sigh of relief.

I think Phil Sharpe's handloading book has a rundown on semi-smokeless powder history.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint