Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
or
Register
ASSRA Home
Board Index
Help
Search
Login
Register
ASSRA Forum
›
General
›
General Discussion
› Powder
(Moderator Group: Moderator)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Send Topic
Print
Powder (Read 2742 times)
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
Offline
Posts: 1827
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24
th
, 2005
Powder
May 5
th
, 2006 at 6:22pm
Print Post
What the heck was semi-smokeless powder that was used in the past to shoot some of those small groups?? DWS, maybe someone could write an article for the journal on those old powders that were available around the turn of the 19th century.
I think it would be very interesting! Bob Saathoff
IP Logged
Schutzenbob
Frequent Elocutionist
Offline
Rheinisch-Westfälisc
hen Sprengstoff-Fabriken
Posts: 2282
Location: Nightingale, California
Joined: Oct 24
th
, 2005
Re: Powder
Reply #1 -
May 5
th
, 2006 at 7:11pm
Print Post
The Powder you're probably referring to was "King's Semi-Smokeless" which was a popular powder but was very corrosive. Also, the primers at the turn of the last century (also corrosive) didn't have enough power to properly ignite it, so shooters had to use a duplex load of a few grains of black powder and the main charge of semi-smokeless, other powders such as "Schuetzen" also required a priming charge of black. Some of the old Am. Rifleman articles by Ned Robert refer to this type of loading.
Bob
IP Logged
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
Offline
Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8
th
, 2006
Re: Powder
Reply #2 -
May 5
th
, 2006 at 11:03pm
Print Post
Semi-smokeless was a composition of sulphur, saltpeter, charcoal and nitrated cotton linters. According to all the sources I've read, it seems to have been the stuff that gave "gunpowder" its popular reputation of being extremely dangerous. Semi-smokeless had both the quick deflagrating qualities of black powder and the instability of the early smokeless powders. It was apparently very static sensitive; there were warnings not to use it during thunderstorms, not to shake the can, etc. It was very accurate in the smaller calibers, not only compared to black powder, but in .22 rimfire was more accurate than even the early smokeless powder loadings. When that situation finally changed, Winchester dropped Lesmok and Peters dropped King's Semi-Smokeless with a sigh of relief.
I think Phil Sharpe's handloading book has a rundown on semi-smokeless powder history.
IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic
Print
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Forum Jump »
Board Index
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
General
Announcements
General Discussion ««
Single Shot Rifles
Reloading the Single Shot Rifle
Gunsmithing Single Shot Rifles
Collecting Single Shot Rifles
Hunting with Single Shot Rifles
Rifle Photos
ASSRA Match Scores
For Sale/Trade
Support and Feedback
ASSRA.COM Feedback and Suggestions
Forum Help
Membership Support
« Board Index
‹ Board
ASSRA Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.6.12
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.
Page completed in 1.2812 seconds.