Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) 2Fg or not 2Fg (Read 339 times)
1Hawkeye
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 292
Location: South end of Northern Virginia
Joined: Jun 29th, 2019
2Fg or not 2Fg
Sep 7th, 2026 at 1:34pm
Print Post  
What would be the better powder for .40-65, .45-70,& .50-70? I've tried 1Fg in the  .50-70 and 2Fg in the .40-65 but I'm wondering if one is better than the other for the 3 calibers that I'm thinking about going to the dark side to load. I've got great smokeless loads for the  .40-65 and  .45-70 but I'm struggling to find one for the .50-70.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmy
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Now available in Oklahoma.

Posts: 511
Location: Skiatook
Joined: May 12th, 2009
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #1 - Sep 7th, 2026 at 3:59pm
Print Post  
2F for the 50 but try 3F. See which one shoots better. 3F for the others but try 2F also. Usually 50 and bigger is 2 and smaller is 3. That's the old saying.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #2 - Sep 7th, 2026 at 5:11pm
Print Post  
Any of the black powder granulations will work fine, especially in the 50-70.   A lot depends on the rifle and bullet you want to use.   then factor in what your want to use the rifle for and your tolerance for recoil.  I've been using 60 grains of Fg in an original Sharps 50-70 carbine and can usually see 1.5 inch groups at 75 yards from the sitting position with the original sights.  In my 1870 Navy rolling block 50-70 I've found 67 grains of FFg and the 450 grain government bullet to work very well.     I use that same rolling block load in my Farmingdale 50-70 infantry rifle. 
 
In the 45-70 I use mostly FFFg or FFg depending on the rifle and bullet.

You won't find a magic combination without doing a lot of experimenting yourself.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fjrdoc
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 50
Joined: Dec 14th, 2019
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #3 - Sep 7th, 2026 at 6:20pm
Print Post  
My Miroku Winchester 1885 seems to prefer 3F powder.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
1Hawkeye
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 292
Location: South end of Northern Virginia
Joined: Jun 29th, 2019
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #4 - Sep 7th, 2026 at 11:02pm
Print Post  
I've tried 3Fg and none of them did well with it especially my shoulder and I'm not recoil sensitive.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmy
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Now available in Oklahoma.

Posts: 511
Location: Skiatook
Joined: May 12th, 2009
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #5 - Sep 7th, 2026 at 11:23pm
Print Post  
Forgot about the recoil. My black powder shooting is with round ball in a muzzleloader. So less recoil. 1F is a slower push. 

I've wondered if a lot of compression changes the different grain size characteristics.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
silver
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 255
Location: Central wi,
Joined: Sep 20th, 2016
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #6 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 8:21am
Print Post  
I use 1.5f in my 40-65 and 45-70 with good results. Can’t say about 50-70 I don’t own one.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
1Hawkeye
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 292
Location: South end of Northern Virginia
Joined: Jun 29th, 2019
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #7 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 8:40am
Print Post  
A round ball has way different characteristics than a 450gr slug especially with recoil.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ranch13
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Location: East Central Wy.
Joined: Jan 20th, 2018
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #8 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 9:38am
Print Post  
If you're just looking to have one powder on hand 2f isn't a bad choice, 1 1/2 may be just as good or better in some cartridges.
3f will work in many cartridges, but keeping in mind that it burns hotter, and will cause hard dry fouling so a lot more effort involved in fouling control
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cadyk
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 18
Joined: Apr 13th, 2026
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #9 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 9:59am
Print Post  
I use both 1.5F and 2F Swiss in my .40-65.  My .40-70 does well with 3f GOEX Express, but my supply is getting low.

cadyk
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old Soldier
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 378
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Joined: Oct 17th, 2015
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #10 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 8:44pm
Print Post  
jimmy wrote on Sep 7th, 2026 at 11:23pm:
Forgot about the recoil. My black powder shooting is with round ball in a muzzleloader. So less recoil. 1F is a slower push. 

I've wondered if a lot of compression changes the different grain size characteristics.

I use Swiss 3F in 45-70-535 Yes it kicks. Just grit your teeth and close your eyes. Compression makes a big difference.
  

"White man have very strong Medicine. Shoot today maybeso kill you tomorrow." Esa-Tai Commanche warrior
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmy
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Now available in Oklahoma.

Posts: 511
Location: Skiatook
Joined: May 12th, 2009
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #11 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 9:16pm
Print Post  
Old Soldier wrote on Sep 8th, 2026 at 8:44pm:
jimmy wrote on Sep 7th, 2026 at 11:23pm:
Forgot about the recoil. My black powder shooting is with round ball in a muzzleloader. So less recoil. 1F is a slower push. 

I've wondered if a lot of compression changes the different grain size characteristics.

I use Swiss 3F in 45-70-535 Yes it kicks. Just grit your teeth and close your eyes. Compression makes a big difference.



Sometimes what works, works.  🤣

Should keep your eyes open though and enjoy the experience. 🤣
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RJ-35-40
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 369
Location: Saint Augustine
Joined: Dec 7th, 2016
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #12 - Sep 8th, 2026 at 10:29pm
Print Post  
Stocked up on Swiss 2 F many years ago.
Because I'm traveling I don't have the powder handy

IIRC my Swiss 2F is the original European grading designation which I think is in todays Anglo-American Scale (U.S. Classification) 1 1/2F.

I make mention of the difference in case others are not aware of the change in nomenclature.

European Grades 1-5
Anglo American 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F

The differences are probably small but different non the less

Ranch13 wrote on Sep 8th, 2026 at 9:38am:
If you're just looking to have one powder on hand 2f isn't a bad choice, 1 1/2 may be just as good or better in some cartridges.
3f will work in many cartridges, but keeping in mind that it burns hotter, and will cause hard dry fouling so a lot more effort involved in fouling control

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: 2Fg or not 2Fg
Reply #13 - yesterday at 4:16pm
Print Post  
if I remember right, the European numbers are backwards from ours.   That is, Swiss #4 is what we call 1 1/2 Fg.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint