Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) strength of Encore 45-70 (Read 312 times)
JHand
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 237
Joined: Apr 15th, 2024
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #15 - yesterday at 5:22pm
Print Post  
When i was hot rodding my #1, I was shooting a 350gr hornady at a touch over 1800fps, i think I used 60gr of h335. That was a beast off the bench. I did load up some 450gr cast bullets and that I didn't finish the box of. I let a guy shoot it, and his words were "that is violence personified" Cheesy

I guess a good question is what are you loading for? One of the guys I shot with did an African hunt every year (rich farmer) and said the 350gr load was more than enough to go through an elephant skull
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1293
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #16 - yesterday at 5:45pm
Print Post  
bullshop wrote yesterday at 5:06pm:
I just checked the Lyman 4th edition cast bullet handbook for 45-70 loads.  The heaviest bullet they show is a 540 grain Saeco
They show in their Ruger only section a load with that Saeco bullet with a charge of VV N-135 of 52 grain producing 1737 fps velocity at 37,100 cup
Personally I put that in the group two section for modern Marlin and Winchester laver action rifles.
This does though illustrate the dilemma with trying to take the 45-70 to higher velocities that with powders of the proper burn rate it simply runs out of room if trying to stay with industry standard max cartridge length.
If it weren't true we would likely never  have gotten the 45/2.5" flanged known to more common folk as the 458 Win Mag. I have killed a lot of big critters with max group two loads and never once saw any short fall.


Big difference between cup and psi. Might check the VV data for that combination. May not be available in psi, only Mpa. But that converts reasonably well. Cup to psi just doesn’t work.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7632
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #17 - yesterday at 5:52pm
Print Post  
I'm always happy to help a guy out with recoil. I started to tear my shoulder tenons with my 45/70 back in the '90's and had rotor cuff surgery in about 2007.

Lyman #46 list a 405 gr, Win SP jacketed at 2157 fps, with 60 gr RX7at only 37,500 CUP, 2.735 OAL.
Speer 405 gr FN J, 2113 fps with 57.0 gr RX7 at 37k CUP, 2.64 OAL.
500 gr Hornaday, J at 1879 fps, with 57.0 gr H4895 and 39k CUP, 2.930 OAL.

If you want serious Griz protection, and enough recoil that you can barely hang on to the rifle, you need a 8 bore double, with a 1080 gr bullet.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7632
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #18 - yesterday at 5:59pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Big difference between cup and psi. Might check the VV data for that combination. May not be available in psi, only Mpa. But that converts reasonably well. Cup to psi just doesn’t work.

At ~40k they are about the same, in the info I have and separate after that.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
bullshop
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 342
Joined: Sep 14th, 2017
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #19 - yesterday at 7:49pm
Print Post  
I like the 8 bore hole but such rifles are not in my budget range .
Biggest medicine I can afford is a 12 bore H&R handy rifle. With about an 800 grain 73 caliber full bore slug it brings misery  into sharp focus.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
YippyKiYay
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 38
Location: Wichita Falls Texas
Joined: Apr 4th, 2026
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #20 - yesterday at 8:18pm
Print Post  
My thoughts are 2 fold.  An Encore shouldn't be compared in strength to a Farquharson falling block action like the Ruger No 1, nor the Siamese Mauser action.  I'd feel comfortable using Lever gun data in the Encore, but not No 1, and absolutely not Siamese Mauser data.   
The big issue for me using Ruger data in my No 1 was recoil.  My 8 lb. No 1's recoil with top loads was much worse than my 10 lb. 416 Taylor, closer to a 14 lb. 500 Nitro Express.   
Also,  if I was needing Grizzly medicine I'd want something with more ammo than a SS.
  

Bring Enough Gun
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SILVERTIP
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 41
Location: Mtns of New Mexico &  Alabama
Joined: Oct 1st, 2017
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #21 - Today at 8:08am
Print Post  
With 45-70 rifles ranging  from an 1885 HW Winchester, through a 1914 Model 1886 original half magazine,  1878 Sharps Borchardt, an earlier no-extra safety 1895 Marlin, to an earlier Shiloh Sharps ...agree that there many pressure levels to the 45-70 GOVT cartridge. My pressures and velocities with 405 gr cast bullets are generally at the mid to  lower end.

For more required performance  levels as in  serious Alaskan use, I prefer the early 1886 nickle steel or the Model 71 Winchester in the 450 Alaskan or 450 Fuller wildcats on the 348 WCF case.
With homestead land in the Interior, bears can be a real issue.
Reliability and accurate  controlled repeat shots are the necessary requisites, not high velocity or higher pressure handloads. Velocities for a 400 gr jacketed bonded-core bullet are in the 45-90 WCF range and function well.
They actually seem to be more accurate than similar results from a .50 Alaskan with 450 gr bullets in a similar Model 71.
  

Socialism represents the equal sharing of misery.  Churchill
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bullshop
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 342
Joined: Sep 14th, 2017
Re: strength of Encore 45-70
Reply #22 - Today at 10:30am
Print Post  
Thank you all for your opinions on this subject.  I appreciate the input.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint