Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons (Read 9344 times)
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #15 - Feb 8th, 2025 at 11:04pm
Print Post  
CW wrote on Feb 8th, 2025 at 10:46pm:
TexasMac  - This is a lot of really good information. Thank you for putting it all together! 
Question????
You and Beltfed in the other thread confirmed that Badger did not single point rifle the BPCR barrels but used a broach to rifle them and then lap. 

You wrote:
Disadvantages of broach rifling:
Broaches are expensive and hard to make.
Different groove configurations and different rifling twists require a new broach. 
Broach-rifled barrels must be lapped. 
The broach-rifling system is not flexible.
Match-grade barrels are not compatible with this system. 

In this thread, you mention the above and the last point is what is in question. "Match-grade barrels are not compatible with this system."
Many of us have come to think Badger barrels on the BPCR rifle are among the top brands for accuracy. 
Can you explain a little more on this point please?
-Michael Rix


Good point Michael.  I don't have an answer & did not catch that comment when posting the info.  If I had I would have had the same question as you.  The info on "broaching" came from an NRA article dated 2017.  I believe the success of the Browning, Shiloh Sharps & other BPCR rifles using Badger barrels have proven that point wrong, as least as far as BPCR rifles are considered.  There may be an accuracy disadvantage with high-velocity firearms utilizing broaching vs. some of the other methods.

Wayne
« Last Edit: Feb 8th, 2025 at 11:11pm by texasmac »  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
condorsc
Full Member
***
Offline


NRA Life/Benefactor, ASSRA,
SCV Life

Posts: 210
Location: Beaufort, S.C.
Joined: Nov 13th, 2021
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #16 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 4:39am
Print Post  
Many thanks for this thread, Wayne. I have extensive experience electrolyzing steel, iron, brass, etc. but none with new bare steel. Can you or someone comment on the electrolyte(s) and amperage used in the cation process? How long does it take to rifle a barrel this way? Does that vary with the size of the bore? Again, thanks.  

« Last Edit: Feb 9th, 2025 at 3:49pm by condorsc »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkaires
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No Stronger Bond

Posts: 1672
Location: Dingmans Ferry, PA
Joined: Oct 26th, 2012
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #17 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 6:24am
Print Post  
texasmac wrote on Feb 8th, 2025 at 11:04pm:
CW wrote on Feb 8th, 2025 at 10:46pm:
TexasMac  - This is a lot of really good information. Thank you for putting it all together! 
Question????
You and Beltfed in the other thread confirmed that Badger did not single point rifle the BPCR barrels but used a broach to rifle them and then lap. 

You wrote:
Disadvantages of broach rifling:
Broaches are expensive and hard to make.
Different groove configurations and different rifling twists require a new broach. 
Broach-rifled barrels must be lapped. 
The broach-rifling system is not flexible.
Match-grade barrels are not compatible with this system. 

In this thread, you mention the above and the last point is what is in question. "Match-grade barrels are not compatible with this system."
Many of us have come to think Badger barrels on the BPCR rifle are among the top brands for accuracy. 
Can you explain a little more on this point please?
-Michael Rix


Good point Michael.  I don't have an answer & did not catch that comment when posting the info.  If I had I would have had the same question as you.  The info on "broaching" came from an NRA article dated 2017.  I believe the success of the Browning, Shiloh Sharps & other BPCR rifles using Badger barrels have proven that point wrong, as least as far as BPCR rifles are considered.  There may be an accuracy disadvantage with high-velocity firearms utilizing broaching vs. some of the other methods.

Wayne


Hi Wayne,

Shiloh barrels are button rifled.

Bob
  

ASSRA #11031
NRA Life
Proud Noodlehead

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history, when everybody stands
around reloading."~ ~ Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkaires
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No Stronger Bond

Posts: 1672
Location: Dingmans Ferry, PA
Joined: Oct 26th, 2012
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #18 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 6:28am
Print Post  
From Kirk on the Shiloh forum:

Post by Kirk,

Good morning guys, I didn't forget anyone, just got back from the Safari show.
Anyway, to answer your question, Shiloh barrels are and have always been buttoned. When we bought the company in 1991 Wolf was using 11L37 steel which was good steel but not the best for the kind of shooting we do today. Around the tail end of 1992 I, with the help of some good friends in the industry switched myself over to 4150S steel. I run this steel at a 30 - 31 rockwell, pretty hard. I first run it through a heat soak, to releive it of any stress. We then drill, ream, and button the barrel, on 45 caliber the button produces around 60 ton, I like this method, because if there is a flaw in the steel this finds it, and not everyone shooting Shilohs are using these low pressure black loads. The next thing that happens, is they get hung, muzzle down and run through another heat cycle, which is the very same as chryo. only on the other end of the scale. After this, is when the barrel is inspected then matched up to a gun. Shiloh has been making barrels and guns for many, many years now and after being involved in many, many shoots I am quite confident that a Shiloh barrel will hold it's own with any of them. Look at Steve Brooks and all of his wins or this year at Raton, and for those of you that were at Raton this year know how the match was won, and how close it was back to the old good day and bad windy day and guess what day the guys shooting the Shilohs got lucky with?? If there are anymore questions please don't hesitate to call. Thanks, Kirk
  

ASSRA #11031
NRA Life
Proud Noodlehead

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history, when everybody stands
around reloading."~ ~ Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #19 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 9:22am
Print Post  
Bob (rkaires),

Thanks for the correction.  C Sharps may have been the Sharps supplier I was thinking about that used Badger barrels?

Wayne
« Last Edit: Feb 9th, 2025 at 4:25pm by texasmac »  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #20 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 9:56am
Print Post  
condorsc wrote on Feb 9th, 2025 at 4:39am:
Many thanks for this thread, Wayne. I have extensive experience electrolyzing steel, iron, brass, etc. but none with new bare steel. Can you or someone comment on the electrolyte(s) and amperage used in the cation process? How long does it take to rifle a barrel this way? Does that vary with the size of the bore? Again, thanks.


Gerald,

The cation process uses a very strong acid.  I believe you are referring to ECM rifling (Electrolytic machining rifling), which uses electrolysis.  It was discussed later in this thread.  I don't have any further details but there is info on the Internet and some YouTube videos on the process.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18020
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #21 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 11:36am
Print Post  
Are there any Match Grade barrels that are broach cut? I think when they mentioned the part about match grade barrels not being compatible it's referring to barrels that are broach cut?
Broach cut rifling is used for mass produced barrels and all grooves are cut at one time with the broach cutting head. Doesn't sound like it would make for very accurate barrels to my thinking.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #22 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 1:40pm
Print Post  
Since Michael Rix's question on match grade quality of Badger barrels & marlinguy's comment, I thought I check out what rifling process other barrel suppliers use.  Although there are a lot of Internet threads on which is better, cut or button rifling, none I could identify use broached rifling including the following:

Cut rifling: Krieger, Bartlein, Hart, Rock Creek, Brux, Hawk Hill Custom.
Button rifling: Criterion, Douglas, Shilen, Pac-Nor, Broughton, Schneider.

BTW, some firearm suppliers use their own hammer-forged rifled barrels.  Ruger is a good example.

Since Browning BPCRs all use Badger broached rifled barrels their well-known high-accuracy speaks for itself, although broaching may not be the ideal solution for high-velocity high-precision firearms.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 597
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #23 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 2:29pm
Print Post  
This a stickey if I ever read one Texas Mac is one serious researcher like so many on this site. As a guy who doesn’t shoot much anymore for orthopedic reasons I’m here for the historic and mechanical knowledge. 

Years ago I knew Warren Center (Thomson Center)  and Wes Ugalde of TCU cartridges who went to work for TC. I recall that Bill Ruger was trying to persuade Center into buying one of two German Krupp cold hammer forge machines. It was too big and difficult for TC to invest in. Bill Ruger bought one and maybe both I don’t know. They were giant 10-15k ton machines originally steam driven. As I understand Ruger changed his to hydraulic. 

A point I would disagree with is that hot forging is superior. My understanding is cold forged yields a stronger harder barrel with no grain alterations of the steel during the heat process.  Krupp was building military barrels and heat ruined the life of the barrels so cold forging was the answer. Downside was the size and power of the machine to cold forge. Maybe not the most accurate match barrels but certainly more than accurate enough for most and the military. Most shoot exceptionally well if the tooling is good

Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18020
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #24 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 3:13pm
Print Post  
At one time in Ruger's history he bought barrels from Marlin. Around 1975 I think Marlin got too busy to supply barrels to Ruger and ended the contract.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 597
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #25 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 3:40pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Feb 9th, 2025 at 3:13pm:
At one time in Ruger's history he bought barrels from Marlin. Around 1975 I think Marlin got too busy to supply barrels to Ruger and ended the contract.


I’m sure Bill Ruger hated relying on barrels from other houses especially Marlin during those years. Ruger as I understand it had his eyes on those Krupp machines back in the 80’s. He made several trips to Germany with machinery techs to check them out. It wasn’t until the early 90’s before he got set up and offered cold hammer forged barrels. For some reason Ruger had some personality issues with Marlin’s management and I’m guessing the reason he refused to chamber his #1 & #3 rifles in the natural Marlin 444. 

Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 597
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #26 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 4:19pm
Print Post  
I just found a video showing Rugers hammer forging operation and machinery. Looks like the old WWII Krupp machines are no longer used. It’s all fully automated and a lot smaller. Ruger never took a back seat in modern machinery or his Pine Tree casting operations but he was the first to use cold forging for consumer barrels in this country

Rick

Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 531
Joined: Feb 20th, 2018
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #27 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 9:36pm
Print Post  
It is my understanding that Pedersoli BPCR barrels are broach rifled. 
The fit and finish is not up to the USA made Shiloh sharps rifles but the barrels Pedersoli put out, Sharps and Remington rolling blocks, are chocked and do shoot very well on average.
I have read, tho in my dim past memory, Pedersoli bragging on their patented chocked broach method.   I am not sure how that works.

I guess if I am posting now, I am not much of a football fan..... football is the one with pointy end ball! Right?
« Last Edit: Feb 9th, 2025 at 9:42pm by CW »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #28 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 10:59pm
Print Post  
CW wrote on Feb 9th, 2025 at 9:36pm:
It is my understanding that Pedersoli BPCR barrels are broach rifled. 
The fit and finish is not up to the USA made Shiloh sharps rifles but the barrels Pedersoli put out, Sharps and Remington rolling blocks, are chocked and do shoot very well on average.
I have read, tho in my dim past memory, Pedersoli bragging on their patented chocked broach method.   I am not sure how that works.

I guess if I am posting now, I am not much of a football fan..... football is the one with pointy end ball! Right?


Yes, Pedersoli barrels are broach rifled.  After drilling, reaming & honing, each barrel is broach cut using two broaches.  The first broach brings the rifling up to within .002" of the final dimensions.  The second broach brings the rifling up the last .002" to the final dimension.  Concerning their chock or bore tapering process, I have no idea how it's done but offer the following quote from Pedersoli.

"So... given that we broach rifle our Pedersoli barrels and obtain straight lands and grooves with match grade tolerances, we then add our final high-quality feature which is to impart a very small taper on the rifling, from breech to muzzle!"

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3771
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Methods of Barrel Rifling: Pros vs. Cons
Reply #29 - Feb 9th, 2025 at 11:01pm
Print Post  
Pointy end only in a few countries. The 'proper' football according to some is like our revolutionary war rifle projectiles.   The Rugby ball is a semi pointy.
  

Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint