Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block. (Read 378 times)
steel-pounder
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 156
Joined: Mar 26th, 2016
1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Oct 25th, 2024 at 1:00pm
Print Post  
So everything that i read about safe pressures in a old actions refer to chamber pressure and with antique barrels made of basically mild steel  i can see how chamber pressure could be a consideration. however with a modern barrel of modern chrome molly steel it seem case head thrust to the bolt face would be more a factor than chamber psi. IE.. a 223 rem with ~ .300" case head area VS. a 308 win. with .385" of case head area at 62000 psi chamber pressure the .308 has nearly twice the case head thrust on the breech block of the .223. so is there a max case head thrust to the low wall breech face?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1796
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #1 - Oct 25th, 2024 at 1:18pm
Print Post  
Generallly, the 38 special is considered the maximum for this action.  I'd calculate that breech thrust, and stay below that.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
steel-pounder
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 156
Joined: Mar 26th, 2016
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #2 - Oct 25th, 2024 at 3:05pm
Print Post  
ssdave wrote on Oct 25th, 2024 at 1:18pm:
Generallly, the 38 special is considered the maximum for this action.  I'd calculate that breech thrust, and stay below that. 


thanks Dave, I have seen 38 special and also 357 mag and myriad others. which is what makes it so confusing.  then the miroku low wall being chambered in 63000 psi cartridges really throws off the curve. other than possible better steel 4140 chrome molly is only about 10.5% stronger than 1018 mild steel, why would the miroku low wall be two to three times stronger than the original high wall?


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkba2nd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1931
Location: earth
Joined: Feb 16th, 2009
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #3 - Oct 25th, 2024 at 5:46pm
Print Post  
There were original Highwall actions, the thick wall, and the proofed actions or a combination of the last two, of varying strength. I am quite sure the current 1885 Browning rifles are amply strong for any of the cartridges they are chambered for. The strength of the low wall does not measure up strength wise to any of the original highwall actions. I personally would not chamber a low wall for any cartridge that exceeds the thrust factor of original factory chamberings and original loads. As in no +p loads.
  

rkba2nd
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7268
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #4 - Oct 26th, 2024 at 12:56pm
Print Post  
I bought my LW, chambered in 357 Mag, on a rebored 32cf barrel. I don't know how long or how many rounds were fired as a 357 Mag but, plenty from the looks of that area of the rifle.

Then, because that was long before this forum came to be, I rechambered it to 357 Max and fired it at least 500 times, with loads, with #9, that reached 1800+ fps, with a 208 gr GC bullet, 2100+ fps 146 gr GC bullet and a 208 gr PB, BSed bullet @ 1400 fps, with 4227.

So, I'm in the camp of Frank DeHaas @ 357 Mag as max thrust. That is the info I had on them, before I got my LW.

There are also rifles that at least one forum member use, that are chambered for 32/40, shot BSed.

That's just my experience but, they'll do better than 38 Spec.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
rkba2nd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1931
Location: earth
Joined: Feb 16th, 2009
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #5 - Oct 26th, 2024 at 2:58pm
Print Post  
frnkeore   As I said, I personally would not chamber a rifle with pressure and thrust levels higher than factory chamberings. Others can obviously do as they like. You might be able to chamber a 357 max or a 32-40 in a lowall and fire them 500 rounds with no problems until the person you sell it to fires it with a max charge and max weight bullet fires round number 501 and does have problems. possibly serious ones. I just would not want that to happen. Logic tells me if I want or need more velocity and foot pounds of energy, simply go to a stronger action etc. A good excuse for another nifty rifle!!
  

rkba2nd
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7268
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #6 - Oct 26th, 2024 at 3:55pm
Print Post  
rkba2nd wrote on Oct 26th, 2024 at 2:58pm:
  You might be able to chamber a 357 max or a 32-40 in a lowall and fire them 500 rounds with no problems until the person you sell it to fires it with a max charge and max weight bullet fires round number 501 and does have problems. possibly serious ones. I just would not want that to happen. Logic tells me if I want or need more velocity and foot pounds of energy, simply go to a stronger action etc. A good excuse for another nifty rifle!!

Or, could it be possible to fire it 50,000 more times and nothing detrimental happen?

Until someone does a actual stress analyzes, it's impossible to say what the thrust limit is. But, I will say this, if you start getting stretched cases, go no farther and magiflux it. If all is well, back off 2 gr or more.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
rkba2nd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1931
Location: earth
Joined: Feb 16th, 2009
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #7 - Oct 26th, 2024 at 4:01pm
Print Post  
I will say it one last time, a personal choice.
  

rkba2nd
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Taylor
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1689
Location: Lewiston, ID
Joined: Oct 23rd, 2006
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #8 - Oct 26th, 2024 at 9:25pm
Print Post  
Remember the low wall was designed for black powder pistol rounds. It may hold up just fine with 44-40 and 45 Colt, 13,000 and 16,000, but going higher may cause problems. The 38 Special came out as a smokeless cartridge but was designed to be reloaded with black or smokeless, same as the 32 Special. This applies to the original Winchesters, not modern rifles which may be designed for higher pressures.
  

John Taylor   Machinist/gunsmith
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
steel-pounder
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 156
Joined: Mar 26th, 2016
Re: 1885 low wall, case head thrust to breech block.
Reply #9 - Oct 28th, 2024 at 6:23pm
Print Post  
thanks John. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint