Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
    Offline
Posts: 1531
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8 th, 2006
|
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #433 - Sep 21st, 2025 at 7:46am
|
Print Post
|
Bobw, thank you for pointing out the subtleties in the shaping of the stocks you make. When I do "stockmaking," (I use the term with my usual devil-may-care abandon) I generally get the wood to a point where the shaping is close to what seems to me to be optimal, but "off" in a way I can't identify. I'm generally afraid to go any further, because I can't exactly see where the problem is, and think that anything I might do would take off wood that I can't afford to lose. At that point, I generally say to myself, "Well, from six feet away, it looks like a stock; it's functional at least, and since I've been at this for months, I'd sure like to shoot the rifle before I'm too old and decrepit to do so." So I smooth it down and apply the finish. Your tutorials are great, and anything you can bring up about developing that "eye" for proper proportions is golden. My Howe gunsmithing book says that proper stock shaping is simply a matter of going over and over it, in smaller and subtler increments, using one's eyes, one's experience, and one's sense of proportions to achieve the final result. Alvin Linden, on the other hand, thought stock shaping was a matter of working down to lines and precision measurements. I remember him writing something like, "Looks like we're almost down to that final shape and we haven't used any of this 'trained eyeball' stuff yet to do so!" You might think of combining these articles into a book; "The Single-Shot Gunsmith" or some such. I'd buy a copy for sure.
|