Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration (Read 17187 times)
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #150 - Jan 17th, 2025 at 1:02pm
Print Post  
Another update on the making of the trigger/tang frame.  Sorry for the snails pace on this project but it take me lots of studying in order to accomplish some of this machining.  I really don't want to scrap a part because of a mistakes, so far they have been very time consuming to machine, so I do take my time and really study the original part and how to accomplish the work.

The tang is now done and usable enough for me to start making the other parts of the action.  I still need to remove some from the bottom of the interior and open up both the trigger and lever holes in the bottom.  I will do these as I get to making the individual parts.  When Remington made these parts they did a really nice job of fitting the parts to the frame, so I would like to try and duplicate that.

This first picture shows the cutter I needed to make so I could cut the last inside radius in the frame.  I had to make it so it was usable in reaching into the frame.  The diameter is .812 with just under a 1/4 inch shank used to hold it.  The red arrow is pointing to the first radius which I cut using the rotary table and a 1/4 inch end mill.  These two radius (.406) are the same.  The lobe/hump would not allow me use a tool like the one shown here.  I decided to make this tool because it was really tough cutting this tight radius with an end mill, and the tall side against the screw hole would not allow the full rotation of a rotary table.

In this second picture the three arrows, with numbers, show the order I machined each radius.  Numbers 1 and 2 were both cut with a 1/4 inch end milld mill in the rotary table.  Number 3 with the shop made cutter.  You can see the larger radius #2 cut nicer than the tighter radius #1 using the end mill.

The third picture shows a little better look at the machining. All three are for clearance and weight reduction.  #1 is clearance for the breech block rotation, #2 is clearance for the extractor, only machined on this side, and #3 is the clearance for the trigger.

The last picture shows the other side without the extractor cut.  It really shows the difference in how the different machining looks between the two radius's.  #1 is the end mil and rotary table and #3 was done with the shop made cutter.
Bob
« Last Edit: Jan 17th, 2025 at 1:26pm by bobw »  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #151 - Jan 18th, 2025 at 8:46pm
Print Post  
Today I decided to go ahead and clean up some of the profile of the frame and start the machine of the breech block.

First Photo. The yellow marked area, of the waste steel, will be cut out and used for the breech block.

This second photo shows the mostly cleaned up profile of the frame.  The lower line is hard to see but it is also done.  The trigger frame is in place and marked for thinning also.

In this third photo I am thinking about a slight change in the frame shape.  The profile you see is the same as the original, but I have been thinking about make it look a little more like a regular Hepburn.  The yellow line is the change I am thinking about.  It puts a little more angle down at the back in the breech block area.  I need to be cautious here because the radius of the breech block does not allow much change here but I think this might just work.

Four, is the machined breech block that has not been fitted yet.  The blacked edge, and back, will tell me how the fit is.  I just screw the false barrel stub in until the breech block is tight, then tap it down and see how the wear look on the black mark.  I ended up not needing to do anything except round some edges over.  I don't see any light between the back of the front section of the breech block, and the frame.  The final fit of the barrel will keep the breech block back against this shoulder.  

5. Shows the breech block installed in the frame.  Although, still lots of work to do to it.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
idjeffp
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 335
Location: Boise, ID
Joined: Nov 11th, 2017
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #152 - Jan 19th, 2025 at 3:59pm
Print Post  
I ended up not needing to do anything except round some edges over.  I don't see any light between the back of the front section of the breech block, and the frame.
Nice work Bob!
JP
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jhm
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1618
Location: georgia
Joined: Sep 4th, 2011
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #153 - Jan 19th, 2025 at 8:17pm
Print Post  
You sure you don't own a wire EDM machine? That block mortice looks really precise...



JMH
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #154 - Jan 19th, 2025 at 8:57pm
Print Post  
jhm wrote on Jan 19th, 2025 at 8:17pm:
You sure you don't own a wire EDM machine? That block mortice looks really precise...



JMH


Sure do. If you look back a page you can see it working. Wink
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #155 - Jan 19th, 2025 at 9:13pm
Print Post  
jhm wrote on Jan 19th, 2025 at 8:17pm:
You sure you don't own a wire EDM machine? That block mortice looks really precise...



JMH


Actually, in the past I have always had to clean things up with files and/or paper, so on this one I spent everything I have learned before, from the tool to the process, to make it as precise as I possibly could.  But, my arm still hurt from pulling and pushing the mill quill up and down.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gwahir
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Ve gets too soon olt und
too late shmart.

Posts: 420
Location: montana
Joined: Dec 31st, 2005
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #156 - Jan 20th, 2025 at 1:15pm
Print Post  
Yes. Pulling the quill is hard on the cuff! I am recovering!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #157 - Jan 26th, 2025 at 6:50pm
Print Post  
Been working on the hammer.  I have it fitted in the frame but the rear of the frame slot needs to be finished so the hammer can move back through it.  I will finish that once I have the frame profile finalized, which needs to happen fairly soon.  It still needs the slot for clearance of the  main spring and spring roller machined into the bottom, along with the full and half cock notches done.  The hammer still needs to also be sculpted to its final shape and profile, fitted to the breech block and the spur checkered.

A few pictures of the hammer.  Unfortunately I completely forgot to take pictures while working on it.

The last picture is of the original, for reference.
Bob

Trigger is next on the list.
« Last Edit: Jan 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm by bobw »  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jhm
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1618
Location: georgia
Joined: Sep 4th, 2011
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #158 - Jan 26th, 2025 at 7:55pm
Print Post  
My little quip was meant as a touch of sarcasm. I know all about the quill method as I have employed it more times than I care to remember. Honestly that mortice and block fit is VERY good hence my comment. I have wanted a broaching head for my Bridgeport for years but never found one I could afford.
Again very nice work...



JMH

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #159 - Jan 29th, 2025 at 12:49pm
Print Post  
jhm wrote on Jan 26th, 2025 at 7:55pm:
My little quip was meant as a touch of sarcasm. I know all about the quill method as I have employed it more times than I care to remember. Honestly that mortice and block fit is VERY good hence my comment. I have wanted a broaching head for my Bridgeport for years but never found one I could afford.
Again very nice work...



JMH



I look for a good fit to the recoil shoulders but looser on the sides.  I was told, on one gun, I had too tight a fit on the sides and to leave a little more clearance.  So I do that now days, 

I’ve also looked at the broaching head but was told they aren’t real durable and, at least on one frame I did, didn’t have a stroke that would work.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 652
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #160 - Jan 29th, 2025 at 1:25pm
Print Post  
Bob,
Couple comments if I may, would you agree, fit of breech block against rear shoulder can be controller by the fit of the barrel breech/headspace? And in fact is the very definition of headspace. Within reason of good machining and headspace tolerances. And I do agree clearance on the sides can be a little more relaxed, again within reason. Slop is not a word that should ever be voiced in gun building.
With regard to the Bridgeport broaching head, I did own one for a few yew years and then sold it. I was thrilled to get it but the shine wore off quickly. They are a production tool and really not a one off/prototyping tool. Tedious to set up, taking longer then to just do the job as you have shown so far with, "get it done" attitude. Others may disagree and that's fine but you now know (whether wanted or not) my 2 cents.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #161 - Jan 29th, 2025 at 6:13pm
Print Post  
LRF wrote on Jan 29th, 2025 at 1:25pm:
Bob,
Couple comments if I may, would you agree, fit of breech block against rear shoulder can be controller by the fit of the barrel breech/headspace? And in fact is the very definition of headspace. Within reason of good machining and headspace tolerances. And I do agree clearance on the sides can be a little more relaxed, again within reason. Slop is not a word that should ever be voiced in gun building.
With regard to the Bridgeport broaching head, I did own one for a few yew years and then sold it. I was thrilled to get it but the shine wore off quickly. They are a production tool and really not a one off/prototyping tool. Tedious to set up, taking longer then to just do the job as you have shown so far with, "get it done" attitude. Others may disagree and that's fine but you now know (whether wanted or not) my 2 cents.


Lynn, yes, I agree.  When I say fit, I’m really wanting to be sure I have good solid contact between the breech block and frame shoulders, and those shoulders parallel to the breech face of the barrel. Head space does need to be correct to keep the breech block back to the shoulders.
And, as you know, to get this correct, it all starts way before the breech block work.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Chuckster
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2251
Location: Colorado
Joined: May 15th, 2008
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #162 - Jan 30th, 2025 at 12:47pm
Print Post  
Have found it good to lap the shoulders against the breechblock using a tool that applies pressure to the breechblock like a cartridge.
Also lap the face of the breechblock until it is square with the barrel. Very light cuts both places.
Chuck
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #163 - Jan 30th, 2025 at 6:31pm
Print Post  
Chuck, thanks, I have lapped the shoulders before and will lightly do this one.  I usually fit the face of the breech block to the the barrel by blacking the bb face and running it up against the barrel and then lightly file the tight spot on the beech block face.  This usually works very well.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1638
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Next Project, Hepburn Walker Patent Configuration
Reply #164 - Jan 30th, 2025 at 6:46pm
Print Post  
I needed to trim or thin the belly of the trigger/tang frame so I could fit both the trigger and the lever.  In the end the action side gets blended into the tang frame, being blended to a center line on the bottom.

The first picture shows the layout line and the excess that needs to be removed.   

The second picture shows the roughed out final belly line.   

The blending will start at the line up near the action screw holes and down around to the center of the belly on the bottom.

My intentions are making this gun a pistol gip, more like the 20 some regular Walkers.  At some point I will bend this tang to the shape I want.  Although, this won't be done until I'm comfortable with what the stock will look like.  I'm working on a drawing of the wood....when I get tired of machining steel.  When the drawing is done I will know exactly what bend the tang needs.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16
Send TopicPrint