Richard,
Looking forward to your results as I am planning on gravitating to the 32's, both a 32-40 and a 32-20...
I, like every one at some point in time, weighed and segregated bullets.
I'm not sure how the casting temp affects voids but I'd guess the lighter bullets have some sort of void in it.
I've taken a few lighter bullets and super glued the base to a piece of aluminum so it stands vertical, and with a torch melted them from the top down to see if the voids appeared at the top vs. the base. Not surprisingly very few were exactly in the center and most were near the base. Maybe that is why Nose pour moulds are popular. ???
I look forward to looking into that devise that was spoken of early in this thread.
It might be fun to set up a couple of lathe like pinpoint centering pins to see if a bullet will settle heavy side down kinda like a tire.
Of course this is probably nothing more than idle useless conjecture but from my perspective it may be fun.
Maybe there is a computer genius out there who will calculate if say .3 grains weight difference x.000" off center axis will be negated by centrifugal force.
Anyone, Ferris?
Grand slam wrote on Mar 22
nd, 2024 at 5:14pm:
I’m planning on building a .32-40 200 yard match rifles. I’m limited by rules to using Black Powder (BP) only and I have no problem with that. It seems that the most accurate shooting is with smokeless powder though. And I’ve wondered why that is and I have thought it may be the fact that grain structure is much more uniform in smokeless powder. Burning rate, all other things being equal (which is usually not the case) is determined by the surface area of the individual grains of powder. Because the grain structure of BP varies from case to case and batch to batch, the pressure curve would be different shot to shot and indicated by reduced accuracy. If this is true would sifting powder to produce more uniform grain size per load lead to greater accuracy. What are your thoughts as to why smokeless powder loads are more accurate.
Cheers Richard