Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard? (Read 1581 times)
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3858
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Mar 27th, 2023 at 4:18pm
Print Post  
Already have a 32-20, so...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ISS
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Joined: Feb 24th, 2013
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #1 - Mar 27th, 2023 at 7:31pm
Print Post  
327 Federal perhaps...?

ISS
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1053
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #2 - Mar 27th, 2023 at 8:35pm
Print Post  
I've got both a Ballard and a Maynard in 32 S&W long. They are a hoot to shoot. I shoot an Accurate 100 grain bullet with 3.0 grains of Unigue. It is accurate and cheap to shoot. We were shooting chickens at 200 meters with the Maynard at Ridgway several years ago. It held up to 200 meters and took chickens down with one hit. 

Don't stress a cast Ballard action with the 327 Fed. I lined a 32 rimfire Ballard with the reversible firing pin with a TJ's liner. Go for it. I think you'll like it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3858
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #3 - Mar 28th, 2023 at 1:10am
Print Post  
Yes, the 327 was preeliminated by pressure. I was planning to use the 32 S&W Long and could always extend to 32 H&R when I shoot the throat out;-) Just wondered if anyone was shooting an H&R.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16055
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #4 - Mar 28th, 2023 at 5:33pm
Print Post  
As long as factory ammo never gets loaded in it!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RAM
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 34
Location: Henning, Minnesota
Joined: Sep 27th, 2020
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #5 - Mar 28th, 2023 at 7:04pm
Print Post  
I have a #2 rolling block that I relined and chambered in 32 H&R. I have not had allot of time to load for it as of yet so I cannot help you there, but it turned out well and what i have tried so far has shot great. Mostly light cast loads for plinking. Just need to get it out this spring and try some more loads.
I chose the H&R as I already have a ruger revolver in it and had all of the components and dies. Makes for a neat combo to possibly carry with one load.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3858
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #6 - Mar 28th, 2023 at 7:04pm
Print Post  
True, Vall, but I wonder how many current 44-40 smokeless loads have been shot (before loosening up!) in original Ballards in that loading and at 22,000 CUP max of the 44-40 versus the 21,000 CUP max of the 32 H&R Mag not even taking into account the lesser back thrust of the smaller case. Thanks, RAM, I wanted to get a feel for how it worked in a rifle.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1053
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #7 - Mar 29th, 2023 at 9:14am
Print Post  
There is really no need to go to the H&R mag version if you are going to shoot plinking loads. You can get enough powder in the S&W case to go supersonic if you wish. Most important is to not overstress that cast Ballard action. As I said the 32 S&W Long shot to 200 yards just fine with 3 grains of Unique and a 100 grain bullet.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3858
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #8 - Mar 29th, 2023 at 1:05pm
Print Post  
32 S&W Long it will be.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #9 - Mar 29th, 2023 at 5:30pm
Print Post  
Much depends on the reamer.  What kind of throat and leade will it cut?   I've tried to get 4D to tell me about their H&R Mag reamer, but all I got was backtalk.  Elk Ridge doesn't list one.  Any other ideas?
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bryan Austin
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 8
Joined: May 19th, 2023
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #10 - Jun 4th, 2023 at 1:24pm
Print Post  
oneatatime wrote on Mar 28th, 2023 at 7:04pm:
True, Vall, but I wonder how many current 44-40 smokeless loads have been shot (before loosening up!) in original Ballards in that loading and at 22,000 CUP max of the 44-40 versus the 21,000 CUP max of the 32 H&R Mag not even taking into account the lesser back thrust of the smaller case. Thanks, RAM, I wanted to get a feel for how it worked in a rifle.


I am un familiar with much of what is being discussed. However, I am familiar with the 44-40 max loads. Regardless, I would also be interested in any rifles that "loosen up" due to what may be considered excessive loads.

However, back to the 44-40 max loads...

2-14-1917
Winchester cartridge engineering offices proof pressures documents show the following,

- Loads for the Winchester Model of 73' - 13,000cup average service pressure and 16,500cup proof pressure.

- Loads for the Winchester Model of 92' - 18,000cup average service pressure and 23,500 proof pressure.

If modern standards calls for 13,000cup as the max load pressures for the 44-40, I doubt that 22,000cup is the max load pressure for the 44 W.H.V.

I don't know exactly which single shot rifle is being discussed here, but Lyman calls for 19 rifles chambered for the 44-40. Of those, the following rifles are considered strong action, of which Lyman lists 21,900cup max loads to be used.

Group 2 (Strong Actions)

Winchester Model 1892 (& replicas)
Marlin Model 1889
Marlin Model 1894
Remington Keene Bolt Action
Remington Model 14 1/2 pump action
Winchester Single Shot rifles
Remington No 1 Rolling Block single shot
Remington "Baby Carbine" single shot
Stevens Model 44 1/2 single shot
  

Chasing The 44-40 Website - (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Chasing The 44-40 Forum - (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #11 - Jun 4th, 2023 at 2:06pm
Print Post  
If only there were a Rosetta Stone that would translate their 1917 Copper Units of Pressure into modern PSI.  

The action under consideration is the Ballard, per the thread title.  

The most notorious action for "shooting loose" is the old Stevens 44.  Vanishingly few were ever chambered in 44-40 however.  
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3858
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #12 - Jun 4th, 2023 at 2:52pm
Print Post  
My 44-40 #2 Ballard was rebored and rifled from 38 Ballard Long to 44-40 with a .429 groove diameter. It had been used as a match rifle (with maybe a lot of shooting) and, at some point in its past, had developed a very slight bit of looseness. As suggested, I used pin gauges to measure the link holes and a fine gent made me 2 new screws of proper diameter and it now locks up like a vault. My primary consideration was an accurate load and I was able to get that with a moderate load that should keep everything tight for a long time. For the #2 in question I foresee no problem getting and keeping that level with the 32 S&W Long.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bryan Austin
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 8
Joined: May 19th, 2023
Re: 32 S&W Long or 32 H&R Mag in a #2 Ballard?
Reply #13 - Jun 4th, 2023 at 5:34pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Jun 4th, 2023 at 2:06pm:
If only there were a Rosetta Stone that would translate their 1917 Copper Units of Pressure into modern PSI.  

The action under consideration is the Ballard, per the thread title.  

The most notorious action for "shooting loose" is the old Stevens 44.  Vanishingly few were ever chambered in 44-40 however.  


Ask and Yee shall receive! 

cup is cup and SAAMI lists both 13,000cup for their copper units of pressure (crusher) tests and 11,000psi for the strain gauge pressure tests.

13,000cup - Copper Units of Pressure "Crusher", CUP - page 21
11,000psi - Piezo Strain Gauge "Transducer", PSI - page 33

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Any other questions, feel free to ask away!!

Since the aforementioned data was dated 1917, and included the 44 W.H.V. data, and even though black powder cartridges were still offered, I can only assume the data is for, at the time, current smokeless powders.

Furthermore, according to handloading manuals, it was common practice to load normal rifle loads to 16,000cup...not 13,000cup, and normal revolver loads to 15,000cup...not 13,000cup during the 1930's. Interesting data indeed!
« Last Edit: Jun 4th, 2023 at 5:42pm by Bryan Austin »  

Chasing The 44-40 Website - (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Chasing The 44-40 Forum - (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint