4570mike wrote on Oct 6
th, 2020 at 7:45pm:
It’s my understanding that the Ballard Rifle and Cartridge Company acquired the rights to the Ballard Rifle name so they are not clones. Maybe “continuations” .
Regardless, they produced excellent rifles likely as good or better than Marlin. They were not inexpensive 20 years ago and seem to hold their value today. I think that is a testament to the people who produced them.
JMHO.
Mike.
I think they discovered that nobody owned the name, and simply registered it to themselves. Thus sealing the deal for their own use, and any future use by others.
They were as good, and even better than originals because of modern metallurgy, and the talent of some of the finest modern gunsmiths of that time. Not sure any company could assemble such a group today! But I do think the possibility of building a quality Ballard is real. Just what it would cost, and who could build them?
I had 5 Cody Ballards that were part of a friend's estate years ago. He told his wife to get them to me to sell; which I did. Along with his guns were all the original paperwork from late 1990's to early 2000's. I personally was shocked at how reasonably priced the guns were! His were all high grade models that had better wood, set triggers, checkering, and better finish. And his .22 had a receipt with it from 1998 for under $2,000. He had a beautiful #6 with crescent buttplate in .38-50, #4 in .45-70, #6 in .40-65, and a Schoyen in .22LR. None of them was over $2900 new price.
Even back 15-20 yrs. ago I found these prices reasonable for the high end finish, and high quality. And several were ordered with MVA sights on them from Cody.