Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready (Read 9565 times)
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #15 - May 5th, 2019 at 6:06pm
Print Post  
Quote:
During Schuetzen's Golden Age, semi-smokeless was used as the main charge with a priming charge being 3-5 grains (bulk) DuPont No.1 smokeless.
Missed the smokeless side of the charge, didn't I  Embarrassed
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #16 - May 5th, 2019 at 6:15pm
Print Post  
And 1Fg compared with the reference velocity of 1400 fps, 1134 fps doesn't even come close
Oh well, a learning experience with this caliber.  Even the 4198 charge at 1310 fps doesn't come close to the stated 1510 fps
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dales
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 311
Location: Western NY
Joined: Oct 21st, 2013
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #17 - May 5th, 2019 at 6:49pm
Print Post  
I bought a Stevens 52 in 28-30 a couple of months ago and have been working on smokeless loads . Tried 4100 and h108 with no luck , would get velocity drop of 200 fps at least 1 out of every 5 shots. Switched to 4227 and problems went away. I am using 130 and 150 grain bullets with a cork wad .
 
A while back some one was making 28-30 brass using 30-06 cases , must have been a lot of work and many steps involved. 

Dales
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #18 - May 5th, 2019 at 9:49pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Switched to 4227 and problems went away
Dales, good information. Why?
Alliant 300-MP burn rate is right in there with IMR/H 4227/4198 and a little slower than H110. So using 15.7gr of 4198, I'll drop down 10% and work my way up to where the rifle likes good accuracy
Thanks
As for the cork wad - on or off the powder column?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dales
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 311
Location: Western NY
Joined: Oct 21st, 2013
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #19 - May 6th, 2019 at 8:58am
Print Post  
I tried 300MP also with the same problem , ignition problem ?  I have the wad 1/4" above powder . I am using Bertram cases so small rifle primers , maybe that is why original cases used large rifle primers .
Dales
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1090
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #20 - May 6th, 2019 at 9:20am
Print Post  
4227 is working good so far for me. Of the pistol powders mentioned, it seems generally more stable in reduced capacity loads and light bullets. Probably due to having more bulk, better fill, and generally takes a bit more powder to reach the same velocity.

4198 has a better fill, but leaves more unburned powder behind.

If your velocity is that much lower than a reliable prediction, I would capture a bullet and look for excessive carbon fouling in front of the base. Look for the same behind the neck of your brass. The pressure has to be going somewhere.

Also check the volume of the brass. My UMC depending on trim length, hold 38-39 grains of distilled water by weight. They are a bit short for the most part.

If using Quickload for estimates, I always have trouble with cast bullets matching predictions without making adjustments, and one of its shortcomings (or mine because I can’t figre it out) is that it does not recognize the pressure increase when you jam a bullet in the lands. It will allow for a negative seating depth, 1/16” in front of the case is input as -0.0625”. But pressure and velocity drop in the program, when measured velocity actually increases.

For what it’s worth, I’m using 12.6 grains of 4227 with a 135 Hoch bullet seated .080” ahead of the case. Velocity is in the low/mid 1500’s. I am sorting through some rifle and sight issues, as well as casting, but in general three shot groups are 3/4” at 50 yards. Tang sight, off bags. Load development really hasn’t even started other than picking a likely powder.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #21 - May 6th, 2019 at 6:03pm
Print Post  
Quote:
I tried 300MP also with the same problem , ignition problem ? 

Dales, Definitely an ignition problem with 300-MP:
* I've shot 300-MP in 32-40's & 38-55's (fixed and breached) with LR Magnum primers ... all went boom and good SD's
Today I charged 12 cases with 300-MP, using CCI SR & Remington SR Benchrest primers
* One ignited the powder column
* 11 went 'Poof" and the powder looked like it was sprayed with water in the cases
* All with no wad
I'll bet money, when I get Magnum primers later this week - they all will go Boom
The one reload that did ignite of 300-MP, 14.5gr - clocked at 1809 fps
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkba2nd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1933
Location: earth
Joined: Feb 16th, 2009
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #22 - Sep 19th, 2020 at 9:31pm
Print Post  
I wish you the best of luck on the primers. At least in this neck of the woods zero. Maybe somewhere on line, but then have to deal with good old Haz Matt!!!
  

rkba2nd
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2833
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #23 - Sep 21st, 2020 at 11:50am
Print Post  
I've been shooting a 28-30 for a long time.  Action is a Stevens 44.  It won't reliably fire anything but pistol primers.  Been using 11.6 grains of SR4759 or 4227, breech seated 140 grain Hoch.  I have a couple of moulds for 285221, but the Hoch is a better mould and bullet.  Never tried it with a chronograph, but it does OK on paper, very easy on the shoulder from offhand.  Some of my UMC cases are getting loose primer pockets.  

I have some RMC cases, but they came with tiny holes in the primer pockets.  Too lazy to drill them out.  Dave said they were annealed, but I think I'd do it again before I used them.

Those small bored long cases didn't appear until semi-smokeless was in use, probably with a priming charge of bulk smokeless.  Too much powder fouling with straight black.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
desert-dude
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 439
Location: Selah
Joined: Jul 23rd, 2013
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #24 - Sep 27th, 2020 at 11:44am
Print Post  
Just to be a bit contrary; has any one tried two part  assembled cases?
Brass tubing plus machined base,  solder together with medium strength silver solder.
Might work well for those long narrow low pressure cases. Or course, this would need to be tested with appropriate safety precautions. 

Many years ago there was a lot of European made .308 brass that had smaller than normal flash holes and gave significantly better SD's.  Just a comment.

Wondering out loud about powders. Maybe H110 on the fast end and 1680 on the other.
There have been comments about 1680 giving nasty muzzle blast so it may be too  slow.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #25 - Sep 27th, 2020 at 3:32pm
Print Post  
A 44 action that won't fire anything but pistol primers has something wrong with it.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joeb33050
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2613
Location: Marathon, FL
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #26 - Sep 28th, 2020 at 4:56pm
Print Post  
I shot a 28-30 at Coors in 1983, where ?? showed and told me about making cases from 30-06. Not easy, but he said he did it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Stevens 28-30-120 (Stumpy) is Range Ready
Reply #27 - Sep 28th, 2020 at 6:33pm
Print Post  
Unfortunately the 28-30 can hold its own against anything that is currently being shot offhand or on the bench. And it can stay supersonic all they way out to 200 yards and it is actually quite sad to see its limited use.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint