Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Stevens 44 (Read 11024 times)
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #30 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 2:14pm
Print Post  
frnkeore wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 1:24pm:
Another Winchester theft of the Marlin/Ballard cartridge?

Frank


It is remarkable that Marlin picked it up so quickly; though each of these rivals probably had spies in the other's camp. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #31 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 3:10pm
Print Post  
Here be the Gospel truth, chapter & verse, from Bert, Chief Sachem of the Winchester Collector's forum:


Bert H. said 
The 25-20 WCF (repeater) cartridge was first offered in the August 1895 catalog No. 55. It was available in both black powder and smokeless when it was introduced. The 25-20 W.H.V. load was first listed in the 1905 catalog.
In the August 1895 catalog No. 55, the 25-20 WCF ammo was listed as follows;
Black powder cartridges were $16.00 per thousand
Smokeless powder cartridges were $25.00 per thousand
In the April 1900 catalog No. 65 the 25-20 WCF ammo was listed as follows;
Black powder cartridges were $16.00 per thousand
Smokeless powder cartridges were $19.00 per thousand
In the 1905 catalog No. 72 the 25-20 WCF ammo was listed as follows;
Black powder cartridges were $16.00 per thousand
Smokeless powder cartridges were $19.00 per thousand
W.H.V. cartridges were $21.00 per thousand

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LarryLee
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 47
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2018
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #32 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 4:51pm
Print Post  
This won't help with the question, but here is my 44 SN 35,xxx

Wayne
« Last Edit: Sep 3rd, 2018 at 6:04pm by LarryLee »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #33 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:01pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 2:14pm:
frnkeore wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 1:24pm:
Another Winchester theft of the Marlin/Ballard cartridge?

Frank


It is remarkable that Marlin picked it up so quickly; though each of these rivals probably had spies in the other's camp. 


I had the opposite thought. Remarkable that Winchester picked it up so quickly! I'm not sure it can be proven who did it first, but Marlin came out with it in their Model 1889 before Winchester came out with it in the 1892.
Marlin made 34 of the Model 1889's before switching to the Model 1894. The first 1894 in .25-20 M was in 11-8-1894, which would also be previous to the time frame Bert H puts for Win. bringing out the .25-20 WCF. (copy of Marlin's .25-20M)
So it seems if Bert H.'s info is correct, and we know Marlin factory records are correct, then Marlin did indeed beat Winchester to the .25-20 cartridge development. Even without considering the earlier 1889's in this caliber.
« Last Edit: Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:08pm by marlinguy »  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7650
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #34 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:13pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 2:14pm:
frnkeore wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 1:24pm:
Another Winchester theft of the Marlin/Ballard cartridge?

Frank


It is remarkable that Marlin picked it up so quickly; though each of these rivals probably had spies in the other's camp. 

I can't say, as I haven't seen the Marlin info, that list's it in the 1889 LA rifle but, the 1889 rifle was superseded by the 1894, that precedes the 1895 Win catalog.

I had a 1889 in 32/20, did Win use that in the 1873 rifle? If so, what year did they introduce it?

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #35 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:19pm
Print Post  
Bill Brophy covered it in his book on the history of Marlin, Frank. He lists the 34 1889's made, which is such a small number most Marlin collectors will never see one. I sure haven't.
But I've spoken with Rick Regnier who is the secretary for the MFA Collectors Assn., and he confirms Bill's number of 1889's in .25-20. Both he and Bill Brophy gave me the date of the first known 1894 Marlin in .25-20, which was gleaned from the factory record books.

Yes Frank, Win. did offer the 1873 in .32-20, and a fair number made. Not sure of the introduction date, but COTW states 1882 date for the caliber in the 1873.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #36 - Sep 3rd, 2018 at 9:56pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:19pm:
He lists the 34 1889's made, which is such a small number most Marlin collectors will never see one.


What is the earliest date shown in factory records for a M.'89 in that caliber?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #37 - Sep 4th, 2018 at 10:44am
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 9:56pm:
marlinguy wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:19pm:
He lists the 34 1889's made, which is such a small number most Marlin collectors will never see one.


What is the earliest date shown in factory records for a M.'89 in that caliber?


I don't have that info, and Bill's book doesn't list the first 1889. But he does list the first 1894 in .25-20, which is the date I posted previously. I'd only be guessing that the 1889's were earlier as 1889 production overlapped after the 1894 model was introduced. So it could be earlier, the same, or later.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #38 - Sep 4th, 2018 at 6:31pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 9:56pm:
marlinguy wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:19pm:
He lists the 34 1889's made, which is such a small number most Marlin collectors will never see one.


What is the earliest date shown in factory records for a M.'89 in that caliber?


Got info back just now from MFCA concerning Model 1889's in .25-20 caliber. The records don't show the 1889's in .25-20 as Model 1889's due to them being pistol gripped deluxe rifles. Since the earliest requests for deluxe Model 1894's were actually filled by supplying Model 1889's instead. Those guns were recorded into the records as "Model 1894 Deluxe" so checking the records doesn't show them properly. It was only after the guns owners had their deluxe 1889's checked and they came up in records as "1894 Models" that the association, and historians realized what Marlin had done.
All of the Model 1889's in .25-20 were deluxe rifles, and all recorded as Model 1894. So the number of 34 is what have been found so far to be in error, and I was told that number is low until more are found and run through the record books to compare.

Marlin did some odd things during the first years of 1894 production, just as they'd done with other models. I once owned a 1894 saddlering carbine that was an 1889 receiver,  and barrel, but had a 1894 lower tang and lever. The 1889 tangs had a catch like a '73 Win. had. All the serial numbers matched, and the gun was unaltered, but had simply used up old parts with a new lower tang and lever for a 1894. Records showed it as an 1894 built in the first week of production, thus the use of older parts to build it.
« Last Edit: Sep 4th, 2018 at 6:36pm by marlinguy »  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rebel
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4292
Location: Rockets and Race Cars
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #39 - Sep 4th, 2018 at 8:56pm
Print Post  
Winchester did the same thing.
I have a non-takedown Model 1897 receiver marked shotgun with an 1893 marked barrel.

Aaron
  

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #40 - Sep 5th, 2018 at 11:54am
Print Post  
Rebel wrote on Sep 4th, 2018 at 8:56pm:
Winchester did the same thing.
I have a non-takedown Model 1897 receiver marked shotgun with an 1893 marked barrel.

Aaron


Since Marlin did not begin the process of marking model designations on the top tang until around 1894-95 era, the first Model 1894 and Model 1893 rifles had no rollstamp on the top tangs. So it made it easier for Marlin to substitute the 1889's for the deluxe 1894's in .25-20 that were ordered. The 1894 did not come on the market until early July of 1894, so a 2nd catalog was offered after the introduction, so dealers could have the updated version.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #41 - Sep 5th, 2018 at 1:04pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:01pm:
The first 1894 in .25-20 M was in 11-8-1894, which would also be previous to the time frame Bert H puts for Win. bringing out the .25-20 WCF. (copy of Marlin's .25-20M)
So it seems if Bert H.'s info is correct, and we know Marlin factory records are correct, then Marlin did indeed beat Winchester to the .25-20 cartridge development.


Yes!, by about six months, as Bert has confirmed, based on his exhaustive knowledge of Winchester records, but with this difference between the two cartridges: the .25WCF could be fired in a .25-20 Marlin, but not contrariwise according to Bert, because the original Marlin case had a sharp shoulder that wouldn't chamber in a Winchester.  So the interchangeability of the two cartridges went only one way, leading eventually to the obsolescence of Marlin's .25-20.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #42 - Sep 5th, 2018 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Sep 5th, 2018 at 1:04pm:
marlinguy wrote on Sep 3rd, 2018 at 8:01pm:
The first 1894 in .25-20 M was in 11-8-1894, which would also be previous to the time frame Bert H puts for Win. bringing out the .25-20 WCF. (copy of Marlin's .25-20M)
So it seems if Bert H.'s info is correct, and we know Marlin factory records are correct, then Marlin did indeed beat Winchester to the .25-20 cartridge development.


Yes!, by about six months, as Bert has confirmed, based on his exhaustive knowledge of Winchester records, but with this difference between the two cartridges: the .25WCF could be fired in a .25-20 Marlin, but not contrariwise according to Bert, because the original Marlin case had a sharp shoulder that wouldn't chamber in a Winchester.  So the interchangeability of the two cartridges went only one way, leading eventually to the obsolescence of Marlin's .25-20.


It's the same thing Winchester did to make the .25-36 Marlin obsolete also. They simply reworked their version, the .25-35, so it would chamber and shoot in both chamberings. Since Win. was so much larger, and had their own ammunition mfg., they easily put Marlin's earlier cartridge into obsolescence in short time.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #43 - Sep 19th, 2018 at 3:52am
Print Post  
It's interesting to note that, in the Center Fire Cartridges section of WRA catalog No. 55, WRA shows the 25-20 Winchester Model 1892 cartridge (Adapted to Winchester Repeating Rifles, Model 1892), and also shows the 25-20 Marlin cartridge (Adapted to Marlin Repeating Rifles).
Both cartridges were available loaded with Black or with smokeless powder, with the smokeless powder loading being an equivalent in velocity of the Black powder loading.
The 25-20 (Adapted to Winchester, Maynard, and Stevens Single Shot Rifles) is also shown, though it is spec'd as being loaded with 2 more grains of Black powder than the amount used in either of the Black powder WRA 1892 or Marlin Repeater cartridge loadings.
The 25-20 Hi-Vel cartridge (Adapted to Winchester Repeating Rifles, Model 1892) appears in 1903 starting with WRA catalog No. 70, while the 25-20 Marlin High Velocity cartridge (Adapted to Marlin Repeating Rifles) appears a bit later in 1905 starting with WRA catalog No. 72.
In 1918, in WRA catalog No. 81, the Center Fire Cartridges section still shows both the 25-20 Winchester Model 1892 cartridge (Adapted to Winchester Repeating Rifles, Model 1892), as well as the 25-20 Marlin cartridge, but... the Marlin 25-20 cartridge is now shown as Adapted to Winchester and Marlin Repeating Rifles.
In catalog No. 81, both are shown available loaded with Black powder, with smokeless powder (equaling the Black powder velocity), and the smokeless Hi-Vel loading... and at this particular point in time, with all versions using an 86gr bullet.
The 25-20 Winchester High Velocity cartridge loading using the 60gr O.P.E. bullet would not be introduced until after Olin/Western Cartridge Co. purchased the bankrupt WRA assets in the 1930's.
The 25-20 Hi-Vel loadings were never recommended for use in Single Shot rifles.
« Last Edit: Sep 19th, 2018 at 4:16am by BP »  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18048
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens 44
Reply #44 - Sep 19th, 2018 at 11:49am
Print Post  
Marlin's catalog info listed the .25-20 M as "17 grs. of black powder and a bullet 86 grains in weight". The velocity of this cartridge was listed at 1547 fps.
Smokeless loads were listed as the same velocity, and bullet weight. An interesting note was the lead bullet is listed as 60 parts pure lead, and no mention of the other 40 parts. Guessing it would be tin.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
Send TopicPrint