Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Consistency of low wall breach blocks dinensional (Read 1012 times)
corerftech
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Location: Memphis, TN
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2014
Consistency of low wall breach blocks dinensional
Feb 27th, 2018 at 10:53am
Print Post  
Have a 32 RF short low wall that I intend to chamber for CF use and rather than convert the breach block would like to swap.

I know I have some latitude in headspace change but from a dimensional standpoint, are the breach blocks traditionally (unmodified ones) close enough to get by?

A used CF that I can swap would be much simpler than mutilating a good RF block.

Mike
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3053
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Consistency of low wall breach blocks dinensional
Reply #1 - Feb 27th, 2018 at 11:44am
Print Post  
When I was attempting to use a newer style block in an old panel side action it was too thick to fit. Not by much though.  It had a stamp saying .005. I was able to take enough metal off by sanding on a surface plate but it was too sloppy at the bottom to function properly.  Bottom line is it may not be a perfect fit for all blocks.  This may have been related to the old action.  I recently picked up an old CF low wall block with the large  BP firing pin hole.  I will see how it fits in my newer LW action and let you know tonight. 

Jack
  

ASSRA # 11318
I haven’t lost all my marbles yet but there is definitely a hole in the bag somewhere.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4112
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: Consistency of low wall breach blocks dinensional
Reply #2 - Mar 3rd, 2018 at 5:16pm
Print Post  
Overall I've had pretty good luck swapping around Winchester breech blocks of similar style and vintage.  Two problems worth mentioning, 1) a 32 RF block has the centerline of the FP hole drilled lower in the block than the CF version and simply bushing the face of the block and adding a standard CF FP will likely result in too-low hits on the primer.  An original CF block (or a bushed 22 RF block) tends to bring less of a problem overall.  I had 2 low walls in 32 RF converted and the bushed original block had to have a special link to raise it up in the receiver... the original CF block had no such problem. 2) High wall, low wall musket and early (high block) low wall blocks all tend to stick up too high or down too low on the smaller, smooth side low wall receivers.

Froggie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint