Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters (Read 12861 times)
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:11pm
Print Post  
Just a short time back I made a generalized statement that the 1985 scores would not get one into the top three in a Schuetzen benchrest match and took some heat for saying it. The gentleman alluded to 247-7 still being a first place winning score. I have to agree on the very rare occasions when the conditions are at their absoulute worse. The statement I made was also in regards to being competitive with the best benchrest shooters accros the Nation. If one takes the time to review the Etna Green scores that were just posted today you will see it also mimics the past scores for NY, Etna Green, Davenport, Modesto, Raton and a few others. The reason I bring this up all though someone might feel differntly is I felt it important enough to mention it to the new shooters in regards to what they will need to strive for and not to settle for anything less than what has been posted now and in the past. If one takes the time to go back through the score section and looks at NY, Etna Green, Modesto, Davenport and a few others you can then clearly see this pattern of winning scores over 247-7 replicates itself several times. These are not just flukes or luck but what it actually takes to become a top national competitor. I hope some here find this helpful and there are several folks shooting at that level here happily wanting to help others to achieve the same. It now takes 248's and up just to get into the top three in a highly competitive match if not more at a typical match held by those Clubs or the National ISSA National Event at Raton I alluded too as mentioned above. 

JLouis
« Last Edit: Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:17pm by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Statesrights
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 370
Location: Virginia
Joined: May 3rd, 2016
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #1 - Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:39pm
Print Post  
Yet most of the rest of us, who have utterly no expectation of coming in first, have a great time. Come and shoot with us. You don't need to have shot a possible to be welcome.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #2 - Jul 9th, 2017 at 11:33pm
Print Post  
Totaly agree some shoot for fun and some shoot for some real high personal competive goals. Either way it is the fun part that counts the most for either of these groups. This post was more geared to the more serious and it should not take anything away from those who's goals might just happen to be the complete opposite from their's and not the intent. 

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3712
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #3 - Jul 9th, 2017 at 11:50pm
Print Post  
So, if it's OK to just have fun, or to become cutthroat serious- either one, what's yer point?
Is this just another way for you to regurgitate the fact that you can shoot a 247 and I can't? I'm tired of hearing you beating that drum. The majority are probably numb from hearing your self-praising blather.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #4 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 12:08am
Print Post  
Get a real life CF and quit your continued whinning there are those here who are really eager and wanting to learn. It has nothing to do with one individuals abilties but to only help those who want to improve there own by the help of several others here and not just me. If you are not one of those why do even bother to comment? You enjoy what you do they enjoy what they do and everyone here enjoys what everyone does so smile, be happy, mind your own business and continue to pursue your own personal means of having fun.
If I and the others here who are willing to be honestly helpful could only shoot 247's we should then keep our own mouths shut as we would then not have anything positive to share to help not just one single person here. But that is just not the case so we will continue to do what we can to help others to succeed by sharing freely what we have worked so hard to achieve for ourselves should that be their own personal goals and not really a concern of how you feel or how you might think otherwise!

JLouis
« Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2017 at 12:26am by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7624
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #5 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 6:48am
Print Post  
John I think you are correct the bar gets higher. This is true in other shooting sports as well. What was good enough in the past is not today.

I look at it another way though.  While scores are important for records match place is a better indication of shooter ability.  With variable conditions a critical factor experienced competitors have the edge when the wind blows.  IF their equipment is up to snuff.  Get a good condition  day all scores are higher, sometimes very much so.

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #6 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 9:09am
Print Post  
JLouis wrote on Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:11pm:
Just a short time back I made a generalized statement that the 1985 scores would not get one into the top three in a Schuetzen benchrest match 

JLouis


1985 it was a totally different sport.  You didn't see BR stocks, twists that were 1/3 faster or bullets 1/3 longer and heavier.   

A top shooter told me he had never shot 248 the day I shot my first with my Darr barreled 44 1/2.  He had just started shooting a new Miller and shot 250s with it shortly after that.

The biggest change has been the equipment. 

The late Bill Crane told me I could have 2 good target rifles for what I  paid for the Stevens Pope Ballard.  Looks like he was right, eh?  Roll Eyes
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Quarter_Bore
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 817
Location:   
Joined: Dec 16th, 2005
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #7 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 10:03am
Print Post  
As with everything in life it depends on what is important to you and how you define your own goals.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #8 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 11:40am
Print Post  
Bob Z I would tend to agree. From 1993 to 1999 there were 12ea. 250's recorded and from 2000 to present there have been 55ea. recorded by both the ASSRA and ISSA at 200yds. So one can clearly see the trend moving towards the higher scores now being required for one to be able to get into the top three nation wide. It is not all that unusual now to see identical scores and the places being determined by center count and widest shots and I will use 249's as an example as I have seen this take place on several occassions as well as in the various posted scores. Another good example is 249 being followed by numerous 248's dictating the top three places and very common these days. This trend also seems to hold true for the iron sight bench scores as well 248, 247 and 246's are typicaly now what it takes to get into the the top three and those used to be the scope bench winning scores back in the 80's nation wide. 

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #9 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 11:48am
Print Post  
Quarterbore I could not agree more its a very diverse group with varying individual personal goals being set by all. I also have the up most respect for those just wanting to get out and punch holes in paper as they too have there own personal goals that are just as enjoyable for them to achieve as they are for a serious competitior.

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3712
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #10 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 12:06pm
Print Post  
He means he respects them if they keep their mouths shut. 
Lesson: Never, never dispute the all-knowing JL opinion.

Guys, here's a serious question- Is a two-tenths group less valuable at the local range on Wednesday than it would have been in the match on Saturday? I think doing it at all is the quest.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7421
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #11 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 12:26pm
Print Post  
JLouis wrote on Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:11pm:
Just a short time back I made a generalized statement that the 1985 scores would not get one into the top three in a Schuetzen benchrest match and took some heat for saying it. The gentleman alluded to 247-7 still being a first place winning score. I have to agree on the very rare occasions when the conditions are at their absoulute worse. 

It now takes 248's and up just to get into the top three in a highly competitive match if not more at a typical match held by those Clubs or the National ISSA National Event at Raton I alluded too as mentioned above. 

JLouis


It was me that JL is of course refering to, regarding 247's. My statement was about, getting a rifle shooting, competitively as regards the breech seating depth, using the old Ron Long way of doing it. That was for reference only, I now use the Russ Weber method and it seems to produce better scores. The point was to get newer shooters competitive and I'm sure that the newer shooters would be happy to have a 247 as a base line, to get started. Scores go way above the rifles ability to shoot. The person behind the trigger is more important than the rifle, most of the time.

But, since JL made this statement, in this thread, I thought that I would go back and check the Modesto groups scores for the last year (8/16 - 7/17). Modesto shoots a ISSA type format, in that their matches and are almost always 20 shot matches. Last year they shot one 50 shot match that I averaged by itself and added it to the 20 shot matches. So, this amounts to a additional, 1.5, 20 shot match scores. 

Of the top three shoters, there is one stand out that averages about 1.5 to 2 points more that the other top two shooters and that helps to pull the averages up.

Now the results. It turns out that the average of the Modesto's top three shoters is 246.5 over the last 12 months.

So a 247 would indeed get you into the top three places, most of the time! And that 247 would would have got you first place, at least twice.

The numbers speak for themselfs.  I think even the EG and NY people would have wished they had shot a 247 at times.

This info isn't to put the Modesto group down, they are excellent people and excellent shooters but, only to keep inaccurate info from keeping new shooters from testing their skils at more competitive matches.

Frank

  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
bohemianway
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Location: Andover, MN
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #12 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
Gentleman,

Remember that Schuetzen is an Offhand sport and bench is just an equipment verification exercise. I am perfectly happy with a low 240's bench score since it is relatively easy to make up a couple of points in OH (also easy to give up a shedload ...). How often has the Bench score made the difference in overall position? Generally good OH shots are pretty good at bench.

Charles
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
P1
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 96
Location: Bradford, Pa.
Joined: May 14th, 2015
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #13 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
As far as all this about helping others.  I tried entering a discussion with Louis and those with vast knowledge but received no comment. I get the feeling that "junior" members are expected to listen to the vast knowledge bunch and keep their opinions to themselves. Fairly typical of forums in general, a couple of commentators take over. Enjoy the small pond.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Winning Benchrest Scores By The Top Shooters
Reply #14 - Jul 10th, 2017 at 2:33pm
Print Post  
Frank this topic has absolutely nothing to do with you and it's very unfortunate that you feel that way every time I make a postive post. It also has nothing to do with just Modesto but competitors nation wide. Most of what I have stated is more directly related to the scores being posted back East. Your method of trying to average the scores of the top three over a 12 month time frame is also extremely miss-leading. Jerry Hartwig won the last match with a 249-9 & 248-8. If you take the top three at the last match and average their scores out Jerry's average would only be a 243.6 and a grave injustice to him and very undeserving. It was actually a 248.5, second a 247 and third a 245.5 and it is also an unjustice to them. It is also very clear for everyone here to understand exactly what it is you tried to accomplish sadly. It is also very disappointing for you a fellow competitor to feel the need to try and use that method to diminish anyones true abilities as it also pertains to everyone Nation wide and a grave injustice to all of them and not just the Modesto groups abilities that you so detest. 

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint