Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Giving up on the 32-20 CPA (Read 4085 times)
Pentz
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Funf und Zwanzig mit den
Hut

Posts: 435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Sep 4th, 2014
Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Nov 29th, 2016 at 8:57pm
Print Post  
I've decided to let go of the 32-20 CPA after 2 years.  Just too frustrating for me; a few good matches and too many poor ones.  I emailed Gail last spring and got the quotes for rechambering to 32-40; the barrel is going out this week.  Spent the summer rebuilding our deck and painting the house in preparation for decompression and fusion surgery the day after the election.  It will be another month or so before I can hump that rifle and case around.  Good time to be casting.  Looking forward to competition again in February or March.   
  Anyone else go this route?
  

ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Skalkaho
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 867
Location: Montana
Joined: Sep 29th, 2006
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #1 - Nov 30th, 2016 at 8:56am
Print Post  
Why? Which barrel are you shooting, 30 or 32 cal?  Cases not holding up?  Maybe look into the 32 RKS 1.240 Max case...I like my 32-40 but find my 32 RKS,32 Ideal,32 Miller shoots same with 3 gr or less powder.......
  

May the Bullet Gods be with you.......
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pentz
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Funf und Zwanzig mit den
Hut

Posts: 435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Sep 4th, 2014
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #2 - Nov 30th, 2016 at 4:42pm
Print Post  
It's a Shilen .3201 barrel.  This little case is really "peaky" and altho case life is OK I'm running it on the ragged edge to get it to perform.  Wiser heads than mine have recommended going to 32-40 and I'm tired of not listening to good advice.
  

ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18085
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #3 - Nov 30th, 2016 at 6:59pm
Print Post  
Can it be rechambered to .32-40, or will it need to be a whole new barrel?
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pentz
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Funf und Zwanzig mit den
Hut

Posts: 435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Sep 4th, 2014
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #4 - Nov 30th, 2016 at 11:11pm
Print Post  
Gail will have a 32-40 reamer run in to make the transformation, Vall.  She offered that option when I was agonizing over caliber at the time I ordered the rifle.
  

ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bucksnort
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 148
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Jun 8th, 2014
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #5 - Dec 1st, 2016 at 3:37am
Print Post  
Will you be at the turkey shoot on Saturday?  Ed
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pentz
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


Funf und Zwanzig mit den
Hut

Posts: 435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Joined: Sep 4th, 2014
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #6 - Dec 1st, 2016 at 9:52am
Print Post  
Hey Ed-I'll be there just to get out of the house.  Had some "work done" so I won't be slinging a rifle around for another few months.  See you there.
  

ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BudHyett
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 281
Location: Pacific Northwest, WA State
Joined: Jun 25th, 2011
Re: Giving up on the 32-20 CPA
Reply #7 - Dec 5th, 2016 at 2:57pm
Print Post  
Any cartridge can be a challenge and any rifle can be a challenge. I have two CPA Steven 44 1/2's in .32-20 CPA. I did research on the cartridge choice before purchase, from the .32-20 CPA to the venerable .32-40, and went with the smaller capacity knowing I can always rechamber to a larger case. Having owned several wildcat and obsolete black powder cartridge rifles, I also like the ease of forming brass with this choice

I have tried several different bullets and several different diameters in the past two years. The best results have been with borrowed mold producing a 206 grain bullet weight with .320 diameter. However, when I went to order the mold, the maker was out-of-business. Last year, I used a four-cavity NOE mold which copied the Lyman 321471 configuration. This is a good mold, but throws a .321 bullet when I have a .320 RKS barrel and a .319 Shilen barrel. The new molds are tailored to the individual bores as a research topic. 

This year, new molds are matched to each bore, SPG lube will be standardized, there is 125 pounds of 25:1 Pb/SN same-lot alloy in the shed, 6,000 primers of one lot, 8 pounds of powder and scope mounts for a 36X Leupold. If this does not then work, then I can rechamber.  

I will campaign them this Spring and Summer once the surgeon releases me. I found that I have had an involuntary flinch caused by deformed discs in my upper spine. I could see I was moving the barrel in recoil while the bullet is still in the bore, never understood why until discussion with the neurosurgeon before the surgery. Retirement means I will have time to go to the range, shoot controlled conditions and keep extensive records. I want to do an exhaustive analysis of the cartridge, particularly the relationship of the powder choice to ambient temperature. I will publish the results with analysis come Fall.

I remember a gunsmith asking me about ".32-20 CPA" stamped on the barrel stating, "This lettering has to mean something." He knew about breech-seating and was amazed at the adaptation.
« Last Edit: Mar 3rd, 2017 at 9:00pm by BudHyett »  

Country boy from Illinois living in the magical Pacific Northwest
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint