Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied (Read 11061 times)
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Feb 3rd, 2016 at 6:17pm
Print Post  
Sorry to hear that Dave.
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #1 - Feb 3rd, 2016 at 6:33pm
Print Post  
Any bitchy neighbors by Ron's farm?
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkaires
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No Stronger Bond

Posts: 1630
Location: Dingmans Ferry, PA
Joined: Oct 26th, 2012
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #2 - Feb 3rd, 2016 at 7:16pm
Print Post  
That is bad news!

Smiley
  

ASSRA #11031
NRA Life
Proud Noodlehead

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history, when everybody stands
around reloading."~ ~ Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dave_j
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 246
Location: Nevada desert
Joined: Jul 12th, 2005
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #3 - Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:33pm
Print Post  
too bad about the range but knowing how you Canadians are you will find some way. see you at Nine Mile Falls   dave
  

ah heck  AA#9,4227,300MP, as long as it goes bang
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jfeldman
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1079
Location: Imperial Beach, Ca
Joined: Nov 5th, 2005
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #4 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Really sorry to hear that, Dave.  Hope you can find a "work around" and get it open again.

Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16004
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #5 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 10:05am
Print Post  
This situation irritates and aggravates me! Seems a range that was existing prior to development should be protected, and the people who build there shouldn't be allowed to close it down.
What a shame.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cuslog
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 263
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Joined: Dec 29th, 2011
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #6 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:33am
Print Post  
Sorry to hear of the closure.
In the 1980's, I was a member of the Prince Albert Sask. Pistol & Rifle Club. They had a similar situation as the City kind of grew up around their range. The Club worked with the Province on the issue and was able to negotiate a deal where the Province gave the Club a considerable chunk of Crown land (along with the Timber Rights). I forget how much land but it was enough that they built a 1000 yd. range, a 500M silhouette range and a pistol range. The Club logged the land, the Timber sales paid for a lot of the building they did. This was about 20 miles out of town, surrounded by Crown land where there should be no future development.
Maybe your Club could follow a similar path ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cuslog
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 263
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Joined: Dec 29th, 2011
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #7 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 1:06pm
Print Post  
Wow, that really sucks.
Sounds like your County is ruled by Anti-firearm people.
Seems kind of out of place for Spruce Grove, Alberta. You'd expect that kind of resistance in Vancouver, on the Left Coast, not Spruce Grove.
You'd think they would want at least one "safe" place where people could go to shoot, rather than people going off willy nilly into the bush to hang a target on a tree and bang away at it. Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11420
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #8 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 2:39pm
Print Post  
Dave, you and the others at your club have my sympathy. To bad Colleen is not into politics.

       Joe.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #9 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 2:52pm
Print Post  
westerner wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
Dave, you and the others at your club have my sympathy. To bad Colleen is not into politics.

       Joe.

Good point, Joe.
Well-spoken women can be much more effective as advocates in many situations, and cause more public embarrassment to political "entities" than men often are able to.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #10 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 3:24pm
Print Post  
Schuetzendave wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:56am:
The County over the last couple of year's forced the range to invest over $600,000 to build safer berms. 
The rear berms were 80 feet in height even though the Canadian Firearms Officer said regulated range standards only required 26 foot high berms.

The County also forced the range to conduct noise monitoring with equipment and locations they specified. This cost the range $72,000.

The range never broke the noise bylaw so the County closed the range based on intermittent noise.

I believe the County was trying to force us into bankruptcy to avoid a legal challenge since they approved residential development without advising the neighbours of these developments.

Legally we could only intervene before the residential development occurred but we were never notified.
We now have to sue the County for our $5 million dollar development that has been lost since the County never followed Municipal regulations for residential development.

Even if we win the final legal battle we may not find another location and it would take over five years to redevelop our range.

The City of Edmonton and the RCMP no longer have training facilities since they used this range and they cannot move to any other locations.

Many Canadian soldiers who went to Afganistan trained at this range since the military did not have adequate small arms training.

Politicians have learned if you cannot control firearms then eliminate the ability for anybody to use them.

You guys have probably already thought of this:  take this list to attorneys trying to find a firm that will take the case on contingency.  It they believe there is a solid case, some good attorney will take it and run.  Meeting all those requirements flowed by a arbitrary and capricious closure is asinine.
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2256
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #11 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 5:09pm
Print Post  
That's terrible Dave.  The club I shoot at most is actively searching for new property as the writing is on the wall.  We have houses being develped all around.  We've been there since the 1950's and are also where the police come to train.  We have been doing the noise testing too.  Seems like we are going down the same road.  I'm luckier than some as I have a "backup" membership at another range nearby.

Chris.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CajunRebel
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 690
Location: Alexandria, VA
Joined: Nov 18th, 2007
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #12 - Feb 4th, 2016 at 7:18pm
Print Post  
Can you convert the shooting range into a pig farm? Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #13 - Feb 5th, 2016 at 2:16am
Print Post  
either hogs or chickens.  They will wish the range was back  Cheesy
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CajunRebel
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 690
Location: Alexandria, VA
Joined: Nov 18th, 2007
Re: Rifle Range Closure Appeal Denied
Reply #14 - Feb 5th, 2016 at 9:24am
Print Post  
Schuetzenmiester wrote on Feb 5th, 2016 at 2:16am:
either hogs or chickens.  They will wish the range was back  Cheesy


Why be selfish?  Convert it to both, and use fans to ensure air flow. Cheesy

Geez, talk about being screwed.  How about a GoFund lawsuit to the highest court.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint