Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage (Read 22671 times)
RoyB
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 838
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Joined: Mar 28th, 2011
Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Mar 23rd, 2015 at 7:19pm
Print Post  
One of the best articles I've ever read on using double based pistol powders in rifle cartridges. I've been using Unique with fantastic accuracy in 45-70 and 38-55 for years. Now I know why this powder works so well in these big cases!
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Mar 23rd, 2015 at 7:41pm by RoyB »  

Roy B
Dartmouth, MA
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
RoyB
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 838
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Joined: Mar 28th, 2011
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #1 - Mar 23rd, 2015 at 7:41pm
Print Post  
Some info from his site to back up the claims

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
 
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

Roy B
Dartmouth, MA
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 17968
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #2 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 11:01am
Print Post  
I've used all but 700x for decades, and found they suit my uses well. Occasionally I find another reloader who's horrified that I use these powders. Still controversy over the use of these pistol and shotgun powders in long guns.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RoyB
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 838
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Joined: Mar 28th, 2011
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #3 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 11:51am
Print Post  
What he states about flat kernel double based powders makes all the sense in the world. Non-compressible discs seems to add a level of safety.
  

Roy B
Dartmouth, MA
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Adrian
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 122
Joined: Mar 2nd, 2015
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #4 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 1:48pm
Print Post  
I made a great leap of faith and trusted that web page when developing loads for a 30-30, with cast bullets and 8 grains of Unique. I have a piece of paper with a 0.8" - 20 shot group fired at 50 yards with hunting sights. I fired about 800 shots without ill effects.
I also trusted, and i am glad that i did, a friend who suggested 8.5-ish grains of Unique in the 32-40 and 14-ish grains of Unique in the 45-70 ["ish"= +/-0.5 grain). Thousands of rounds later, which i would not have fired had it not been for the low expense and recoil of aforementioned loads, i am happy. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7621
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #5 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 3:57pm
Print Post  
In support of this discussion I offer the following target.

It was shot from a 30/40 HW with a case of reduced capacity. Shot at 100 yards, BSed. The case is solid bronze, with a .310 hole back to the primer pocket and 2.8 cc's capacity. The bullet is the lower one. The "M" stands for the modified spitzer nose that I put on it.

But, you also have to remember (who can forget Smiley ) that all the former SS records have been surpassed, mostly with smaller cases (case capacity/bore ratio) using ball powders.

Most people shy away from flake powders because, a lot of them (like me) load at the bench and get larger SD with thrown charges of flake powders. That said, the posted target was shot with thrown charges from the bench Huh

Frank


  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
RoyB
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 838
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Joined: Mar 28th, 2011
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #6 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 5:12pm
Print Post  
Frank ,

Is there any way we can see a picture of that cartridge? It sounds interesting. Did you turn it from solid bronze? Sounds like it has a very thick base bringing the powder closer to the bullet?
  

Roy B
Dartmouth, MA
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #7 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 5:19pm
Print Post  
Quote:
I've used all but 700x for decades, and found they suit my uses well.

Quote:

"In 1962 a powder called "Hi Skor" was brought out by DuPont. It was the first of the double based, fast burning, flake type powders for shotshell to be made by DuPont. It is the parent of Hi Skor 700X. At about 1964, Hi Skor became Hi Skor 700X with only minor changes in burn speed to the powder."


I "happened"  Grin on a 8# tin of Hi-Skor which was introduced as a pistol powder and lucked out finding a 1962 one page loading data for handgun reloads, ie 357 - 38 Spl to 45 Colt.  For shot shells, it has the same loading data as Red Dot
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7621
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #8 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 5:32pm
Print Post  
I don't have a picture of it but, it just looks like a standard 30/40 on the out side. It also has a small primer pocket. I used standard SAAMI chamber dimentions to make it. I didn't have any fit problems. If you do, remove metal until it does fit. As long as the rim is think enough, the rest will take the form of the chamber after firing about 20 - 50 rounds, depending on chamber pressures.

It was made by drilling the bronze with a 19/64 drill to 2 1/16 (tip of drill), leaving 1/4" from the point to the back of the case. That leaves a little stronger case head.I then ream it to the bottom of the hole with a .310 reamer.

I also made one out of SS (303) with a .310 neck and only a 1/4" hole back to the primer pocket. It's capacity is 1.9 cc's.

You have to make the necks, normal thinkness or, they won't seal.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Adrian
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 122
Joined: Mar 2nd, 2015
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #9 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 5:40pm
Print Post  
Frank, i see how Unique would be almost impossible to measure well trough a powder measure. I use an electronic scale, a Lee dipper, and i trickle the last 0.1 grain onto the scale with a RCBS tickler. Fast enough for me, and since i load one at a time and seat bullet, i avoid the danger of double charging, while my charges are all identical to the milligram.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John in PA
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 590
Location: Hollidaysburg, PA
Joined: Nov 3rd, 2009
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #10 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 6:48pm
Print Post  
In reading the article, I noticed that the emphasis seemed to be on loads that would perform well no matter how the powder was oriented in the case.  I did not notice any mention of a tuft of dacron fiberfill or the like over the powder charge.  Any comments on experiences with or without this addition?  For many years it seemed that this was a common recommendation for low loading density charges of fast burning powders in large volume cases.

(BTW, extremely fine article, thanks for posting, Roy!!)
  

John Wells
Hollidaysburg, PA
Peabody and Peabody-Martini's Wanted!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Adrian
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 122
Joined: Mar 2nd, 2015
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #11 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 7:50pm
Print Post  
John, 
I believe that the suggested explanation for reduced charges of fast burning disc shaped powder working well was that such powder contains nitroglycerin. When hit by pressure and flame generated by primers, the contents of the case form a uniform blend of something, thus generating uniform velocities of bullets.
I tend to agree. On numerous (more than 5) occasions i have compared identical loads of Unique, with and without fillers. It is common for me to shoot 10-15 shots over the chronograph and get exact same velocities. With 8.5 grains of Unique, fixed cartridge, i get 1,370 fps, over and over again, until i have to check the chronograph, just to make sure that it is working right. With fillers, i get 50-80 fps variations, and the loads are not as accurate. I did not use cream of wheat, but various fibers. These, in 32-40. In the 45-70 i has similar experiences.
« Last Edit: Mar 24th, 2015 at 7:55pm by Adrian »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 17968
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #12 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 9:35pm
Print Post  
John in PA wrote on Mar 24th, 2015 at 6:48pm:
In reading the article, I noticed that the emphasis seemed to be on loads that would perform well no matter how the powder was oriented in the case.  I did not notice any mention of a tuft of dacron fiberfill or the like over the powder charge.  Any comments on experiences with or without this addition?  For many years it seemed that this was a common recommendation for low loading density charges of fast burning powders in large volume cases.

(BTW, extremely fine article, thanks for posting, Roy!!)


Unique and the other powders mentioned don't seem to be position sensitive. When I was testing loads in my .38-55 and .45-70 using Unique, I tried pointing the barrel up before each shot, pointing it down, and even shaking the cases to level the powder charge. Regardless of which position the powder was in, the velocities stayed very close, and groups also stayed good. I've never used any filler of any sort with Unique.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 17968
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #13 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 9:39pm
Print Post  
frnkeore wrote on Mar 24th, 2015 at 3:57pm:
In support of this discussion I offer the following target.

It was shot from a 30/40 HW with a case of reduced capacity. Shot at 100 yards, BSed. The case is solid bronze, with a .310 hole back to the primer pocket and 2.8 cc's capacity. The bullet is the lower one. The "M" stands for the modified spitzer nose that I put on it.

But, you also have to remember (who can forget Smiley ) that all the former SS records have been surpassed, mostly with smaller cases (case capacity/bore ratio) using ball powders.

Most people shy away from flake powders because, a lot of them (like me) load at the bench and get larger SD with thrown charges of flake powders. That said, the posted target was shot with thrown charges from the bench Huh

Frank




Wow! Nice target Frank! 
I had one 5 shot group with my Ballard in .38-55 that was under .75" at 100 yds. using Unique and a 255 gr. cast lead bullet. But after numerous attempts, I've never repeated it again.
I haven't found any issue getting accurate measured charges with my powder measure using Unique, Red Dot, or Green Dot? I always have issues with stick powders, but these flake powders don't seem to give me problems.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 826
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: Treatise on Pistol Powder Usage
Reply #14 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 10:13pm
Print Post  
I have a question on using Unique for reduced cast bullet loads...I have a Watson .450/.400 3 /14" Farquharson.  Built in 1902 & proofed for the heavy 60gr. Cordite-400gr. jacketed bullet.  I am not so much as concerned about it's action/barrel strength..but my concern is for the age of the stock...trying to find an accurate, low recoil load for 50yd.-100yd. target shooting.  I have tried SR4759. AA5744, TrailBoss, 4198, 3031..these all produce very heavy recoil..even the start loads.  Would it be safe..or even feasable to use such a fast burning powder as Unique in this huge case?  Where would I start as far as starting loads?  I have .411 cast bullets from 300-400grs.  both P.B. & G.C.  Thanks alot!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint