Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2 (Read 8475 times)
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Mar 17th, 2015 at 8:47pm
Print Post  
Just out of curiosity I intend trying some 4227 in my CPA Stevens in which I usually use 2F.
Some sort of starting load would be appreciated that is safe in this action.
By the way I would appreciate it if no one mentions this to anybody I know as I'm in a black powder club that frowns on this sort of thing.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2942
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #1 - Mar 19th, 2015 at 7:28am
Print Post  
If you are talking about this place, you've got it backwards on the BP vs. smokeless thing. 99+% of the shooters here are of the smokeless variety for Schuetzen shooting.

I've loaded 18-20gr of 4227 with the 279gr Saeco bullet in my 38-56 Marlin 1895 lever gun, but don't know what is considered safe in an original 44 1/2, so use at your own risk. I am always surprised at how much more unpleasant the recoil is using smokeless as compared to BP when I shoot it.
  

Glenn - Stevens 044 1/2, Bartlein SS 5R barrel in 22LR
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7725
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #2 - Mar 19th, 2015 at 8:31am
Print Post  
I would use 4227 and a chronograph loading to get your velocity to about 1250  fps more or less. I think 1100 is too slow for good results at distance, 1400 is too fast for a plan base bullet. Between the two you should find a good load. 

My 38 cal CPA is a 38/55 and use 17.5 grs of 4227 . Considering your 38/56 case is bigger 17.5 ought to be a good starting load.

The CPA action is safe with any reasonable 38/56  load. They chamber for cartridges with much higher pressure than the 38/56 however the limiting factor is more brass than action.   

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #3 - Mar 19th, 2015 at 8:01pm
Print Post  
Thanks for the replies,  I'm currently using 62 gr of PP Wano under a 320 gr PJ Spitzer bullet which gives me an average M/V of 1332 fps, with a max spread of 25 fps.
With the bullet breech seated .160" ahead of the case groups are in the 1' - 1.5" range, I'm just curious to see how much better they might be with the 4227 powder.
Thanks again.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7725
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #4 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:45am
Print Post  
I would load with 4227 to the same velocity as your BP load then test.

My guess is, bullet varables the same, no difference in group size unless. BP load groups shot with inconsistent bore condition. 4227 groups shot with inconsistent mount.  Run both properly propellant should make no difference.

No one is going to agree with me though.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #5 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 8:04am
Print Post  
Thanks Boats.
I will start with 17.5 gr and work up till I hit about 1400 fps, no more. There's a limit as to how much 4227 I can scrounge before I wear out my welcome with the guy who's powder I'm using. Like I said before I'm just doing this out of curiosity, nothing more.
My cleaning routine with BP has been one damp patch between shots, using both sides of the patch. I dampen the patch with a mixture of machine cutting oil and water, one part oil and ten parts water. I guess when using the smokeless the wiping between shots will not be required, is that correct ?.
Mike.


Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7725
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #6 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 9:03am
Print Post  
Mick You are right smokeless is not going to need any wiping between shots. Your BP routine sounds very good. 

Thing about 4227 or any powder that does not fill the case powder position makes a difference. I prefer to mount the gun exactly the same way every shot, vs. using some sort of filler to keep the powder orientated.

Noting your group sizes.  To my eye they are very realistic and probably are the limit of real performance with a rifle that has a round forearm and regular butt stock shot off a simple rest and using sights with less resolution than the high power scopes seen in true bench rest

Holly Grail in Single Shot Bench Rest is 250 at 200 yards.  10 shots touching 3/4 Moa center ring. Depending on bullet size 1 moa  rifle can touch a 3/4 moa ring 10 times

With few exceptions rifles that shoot 250's are wide forearm angled  butt stock bottom specialist guns using very high power scopes in heavy  rest, and handled by experienced shooters. Not to say others can't shoot 1 moa at 200 it's just the guns configuration makes more difference by far than the propellant. And the shooter makes the score.

Sum is position rifles are very limited by their configuration when shooting bench rest.

I like 4227 it’s as good as any smokeless powder better than most. I also like using Black Powder but fact is I shoot a whole lot more smokeless than black because it’s so much easier.  Limit my BP shooting to matches that are BP limited

Boats

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #7 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 7:10pm
Print Post  
Boats.
I probably should have mentioned the fact that when testing my loads I have a Lyman Super Target spot 25x scope on the rifle. If I was shooting my groups with the aperture sights I have to use in our comps, the groups would be twice as big.
I also rest my rifle about 4" from the muzzle, not on the wood. I have tried different resting points all the way from just in front of the receiver to within 1" of the muzzle. I even tried removing the forend to see if it made any difference to the harmonics of the barrel. My CPA is the silhouette model, not a full on bench rest rifle. 
I also have a 45/90 barrel for the rifle which shoots about the same as the 38/56 and bucks the wind a little better. It's not as pleasant to shoot off the bench though.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7725
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #8 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 8:42am
Print Post  
Mick that scope will tighten things up for sure.

Even so way your gun and mine is stocked is going to affect groups off the bench.  Dozen years ago I played with bench shooting using my BPCR CPA.  At the time rifle was 10 years old and had a good benchmark performance.

Put a 12x scope on groups tighten up.  Bought a CPA # 5 barrel with a wide flat bottom stock & proper mechanical rest. Right away horizontal tightened up because the gun did not twist as much on recoil. Still had vertical stringing due to the slanted bottom of the butt stock riding the rear bag. If you look at top bench shooters guns rear is parallel so it comes back straight.

I never changed my rear stock and sold off the # 5 and rest. Thing I learned is don't expect bench rest groups from a position rifle.

By the way friend told me bench ASSRA is scored center of the bullet hole. So benchmark great goup is 3/4 moa 

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #9 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm
Print Post  
Thanks Boats.
Looking back over quite a lot of targets I have noticed that vertical dispersion was usually much greater than horizontal. The only exception to this was when the wind was from either 3 or 9 o'clock, then the groups were more round.
I could easily make another butt stock that was straight on the bottom but being a traditionalist it would look awful to my eyes.
I was at the "Australia Day Bench Rest competition" as a spectator a few weeks ago and there were more ugly rifles there than you could poke a stick at. Really they were just  tools built to do a job, not my cup of tea.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #10 - Apr 1st, 2015 at 10:43pm
Print Post  
Boats
I'm about to re load the 38/56 with the 4227, I was considering just leaving everything the same as my BP load, CCI BR2 primer, powder and two .060 LDPE wads in the case mouth. The Paul Jones Spitzer seated approximately .160" ahead of the case mouth.
I intend to start with 18 gr of the 4227, the bullet weighs 325gr in 20-1. What I was wondering was whether I need to put the wads in the case mouth at all as such a small amount of powder in such a large case will just lie in the bottom of the case and not spill out on loading if I keep the rifle level.
Any advice from yourself or anyone else with an opinion would be welcome.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7725
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #11 - Apr 2nd, 2015 at 7:35am
Print Post  
Mick be careful loading and powder won't spill.   Wad adds a variable that may or may not help.  I think most on this forum would say no wad with smokeless in large cases.

Personally I avoid wads only using them when I have to.

Boats.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #12 - Apr 2nd, 2015 at 8:14pm
Print Post  
Boats
Thanks for that, no sense in re inventing the wheel when someone has done it all before.
I may run the load across my Chrony to see how it compares with my usual 62 gr load of Wano PP for velocity.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2578
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #13 - Apr 2nd, 2015 at 8:17pm
Print Post  
Mike I've only recently started shooting smokeless in my .32-40.  My first attempt with wads wasn't so good.  Several of the experienced shooters here recommended that I get rid of the wads.  It helped quite a lot.  My first smokeless attempt without wads produced about the same accuracy as my best BP loads.

Chris.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: smokeless load advice for a 38/56 Stevens 44 1/2
Reply #14 - Apr 4th, 2015 at 6:56pm
Print Post  
Chris
I don't think leaving the wad out of the case is going to cause me any problems with spilling powder into the rifles chamber owing to the large capacity of the 45/70 case that was formed to make the 38/56.  However I was also wondering if I should put a thin card wad in the bullet seater to protect the base of the bullet from the blast ?.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint