Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Greenhill Graph (Read 23309 times)
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3982
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #30 - Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:36pm
Print Post  
YEA!

It down-loaded and OPENED in OpenOffice!

THANKS!

  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #31 - Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:23pm
Print Post  
Here is a calculator for the velocity adjusted Greenhill formula that allows you to change the inputs and see the results. Change the entries in BOLD RED to see results. It is also conditionally formatted so you can see what bullet length and velocity work the best for your known barrel twist +/-1".
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) ( 13 KB | Downloads )
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #32 - Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:34pm
Print Post  
One note of interest...if you enter your bullet diameter and then set the start for the bullet length the same as bullet diameter, the top line of the calculator results will be the twist for a round ball gun.  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #33 - Jan 10th, 2015 at 8:19am
Print Post  
Also worked for me - Win XP/Firefox/Open Office.

Thanks for sharing !

Phil

  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #34 - Jan 10th, 2015 at 12:05pm
Print Post  
Uscra12,
I see that I and bohemianway uploaded a calculator, can you tell me which one you downloaded? I know bohemianway's works from an earlier response but don't know if my upload worked.
I didn't know bohemianway had even uploaded a file till after I had uploaded mine.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #35 - Jan 10th, 2015 at 12:59pm
Print Post  
LRF ... both tables download - open - saved to computer directory and work
Noticed changing the 150 multiplier to 125 in the twist rate table did not change any output values
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #36 - Jan 10th, 2015 at 3:13pm
Print Post  
JohnBoy,
Not sure what you downloaded and what you mean by nothing changed:
Twist      BL 40 cal
11      @150      @125
12                    1.734
13                    1.601
14      1.784      1.486
15      1.665      1.387
16      1.561      1.301
17      1.469      1.224
18      1.387      1.156
19      1.314      
20      1.248      
21      1.189      
22      1.135      

A 1.5" bullet using 150 calls for a twist ~16 for a 1.5" bullet using 125 the twist would be ~13.5". Please explain what you meant. (keep in mind this is for a .408" caliber gun only. A different caliber will be something different.)
Download my ZIP file and extract the spreadsheet which is a calculator which uses a constant value that is influence by the actual velocity of the bullet. 150 or 125 aren't even part of the calculations on the spreadsheet.
The world of ballistics is quite involved and complicated. There are many many variables and also test data that must be considered. You can't make a long bullet stabilize in a too slow twist. And a short bullet in too fast a twist doesn't work well either.
The Greenhill is only a starting point and not meant to be any exact directive but only a tool.
The reality is that what will work for one rifle doesn't also repeat itself in the next.
The information and calculators are provided here for your use or not. Nothing more.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #37 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 1:22am
Print Post  
LRF - I downloaded the zip table that bohemianway posted.
* Opened the zip fie
* changed the multiplier between 125 & 150 for 0.308
No values changed in the table

Question:  how do I change the table output to a graph format?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #38 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 7:09am
Print Post  
How you work with bohemianway's files, will have to be asked him.
I suggest you download the ZIP file I posted. Neither of our calculators are setup to graph but on mine you can change the calculator for bullet diameter, velocity range, and a range of bullet lengths. All these are the numbers in BOLD RED.
In addition if you enter your barrel twist it will indicate the bullet lengths and velocities that are within +/-1" of our barrel twist. No need to graph.
Again I say the formula terms of 150 or 125 or 180 (for velocities over 2800) no longer are part of it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bohemianway
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: Andover, MN
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #39 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 10:20am
Print Post  
Sorry for the confusion. On mine the only cell you change is the "Diameter" of the bullet. Remember it is a velocity table therefore the 150 and 125 are simplification constants are built into the formula.
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #40 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 1:25pm
Print Post  
Gentlemen, thanks for the clarifications. And I too am sorry to have caused the confusion.  Have both downloads and will use each program accordingly
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7611
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #41 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 3:46pm
Print Post  
Some things to remember regarding stability besides what have been talked about are:

1. Sectional density (SD)

2. Position of the center of gravity. Basically that will change with nose shape.

3. Effects of transonic on bullet stability.

Also, if you'll remember, the Army did some accuracy testing with the 45/70 at 1/4 mile or futher with a 22 twist and the 500 gr bullet, I don't remember any descusion of lack of stability in those trials.

I'm not a LR shooter so, I'm out of my league regarding personal testing that I've done but, for 200 yards or less with Simi-spitzer or spitzer nose shapes, the basic Greenhill formula can use the constant of 175 in our basic 14 - 1500 fps range but, as noted above, there are other factors that will need to be considered.

The first thing that I discovered happened in 1986. I got a close friend into the sport and when I bought my rifle, I thought I had a standard 16 twist and I bought what was the current Ron Long mold for it (1.16" lg). My friend had a HW and I told him to get a Douglas 16 twist barrel and that RL bullet well, it just wouldn't shoot (of course) and tipped all over the place. I then checked my twist, because mine always shot well and discovered that I had a 15 twist barrel. I felt bad that I hadtold him what to get so, I cut .050 off of his base band and from that moment on, his rifle shot just as well as mine!!!

I then played with the GH formula and found what I had to do was change the 150 constant to 175 and mirrored the change that I had done with his twist and bullet lenght. I then used that factor untill I discovered JMB program. 

From there, I found the Geoffrey-Kolbe program about 3 years ago and that program has the best results for at least 200 yard cast and any range jacketed bullets.

For ~200 yard shooting faster twists give NO benefit and can give less accuracy at that range. I say this because I don't want people interested in Schuetzen to think they should get a fast twist barrel.

Frank
« Last Edit: Jan 11th, 2015 at 5:19pm by frnkeore »  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
bohemianway
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 706
Location: Andover, MN
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #42 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 4:15pm
Print Post  

frnkeore, great commentary, thanks. I had an issue with a Ron Long 1.04" in a gain twist 32-40 that ended at 12.4 (my call). I found it had to pushed just past 1400 FPS to stabilize which matched the velocity based results in the jpeg. This made me feel that the analysis is a reasonable "guideline". I also agree that for 200 yds the need for greater than 200gr 32-40s is questionable (I am thinking of moving back to 180gr or less).

Charles
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #43 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 4:28pm
Print Post  
Quote:
...the Army did some accuracy testing with the 45/70 at 1/4 mile or futher with a 22 twist and the 500 gr bullet,

Frank, that would be the 2 Mile Shoot at Sandy Hook (NJ) with an 1873 Trapdoor 1:22 twist
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7611
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Greenhill Graph
Reply #44 - Jan 11th, 2015 at 5:15pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Quote:
...the Army did some accuracy testing with the 45/70 at 1/4 mile or futher with a 22 twist and the 500 gr bullet,

Frank, that would be the 2 Mile Shoot at Sandy Hook (NJ) with an 1873 Trapdoor 1:22 twist
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)


Thanks John Boy

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint