uscra112 wrote on Apr 14
th, 2014 at 1:33am:
The way Winchester and Savage did it, it was a terrible idea. OTOH the Stevens 44's barrel shank has a much greater aspect ratio, and properly fitted it is pretty stable. The 44 1/2 gave some of this up, but not all of it.
That said, I've read that Pope and some others put taper pins across the Stevens frame to add stability. Never seen one like that, though.
Takedown mechanisms are just like anything that's threaded; over time the more you take them down, the looser they get. Same goes for the various locking mechanisms like Winchester's lever on repeater tubes, or Marlin's locking cam on repeaters. Over the 100 plus years these guns have existed, I've seen many that were sloppy from being taken down too often.
My personal feeling is that most takedown type guns should rarely be taken down. They should remain fully assembled, even for cleaning, if you have one that's tight and you want to keep it tight. I see guys constantly playing with their TD guns showing how it works, and it makes me cringe knowing there are just a certain number of times left in them, and no easy way to tighten them up once they're loose.
A lot of the old custom gun makers like Pope, Schoyen, etc. used various methods to retain the barrel beyond the barrel threads. Most seem to not use thread tension as the prime source to retain a barrel, and instead used a cross pin, or the set screw like Stevens used. My Schoyen Ballard has a set screw drilled and tapped right through the serial number under the receiver, and my Zettler Ballard uses a cross pin.