Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Lyman 103 variations (Read 25648 times)
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #15 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 10:57pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Did Lyman use the same DA code assigned to the WRA model 1894 on the Lyman 103 sight, as well as on the Lyman 1, 1A, 2, and 2A sights?



Yes.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #16 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:04pm
Print Post  
slumlord44 wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 10:46pm:
According to Stroebel's book they do but he could definitely be wrong. The Lyman 144 sight was only made specifically for the Stevens 417's and 418's. It may not have been offered in their catalog's.


He's wrong about many things, but it makes sense that 144s wouldn't be listed in the catalog if they were a special order for Stevens.  Does the stem of 144s move side to side in the base for windage adj.?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #17 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:14pm
Print Post  
Yes, but it has less range of adjustment than the 103. Hard to find a decent picture of one anywhere. There is an H marked 103 currently on Ebay.  1 1/2" hole spacing and the stem height looks close to mine. It has the correct graduated marked collar on the stem. Looks like it would work well on a 418 or Favorite. Tempting depending on how high it goes. H is for some Marlin's.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #18 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:16pm
Print Post  
Slumlord44,

Here is a pic of an early 103 version.
Note the presense of the patent date, and the lack of the large washer (under the windage adjusting screw retaining nut) that is present on the later version 103 shown in the right side of your picture. Also note that the early version elevation barrel is conical and does not have the radiused cap at the top of the barrel that retains the barrel to the staff as you see on your righthand sight

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #19 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:19pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote Quote:
...Anyway, hole spacing is 1-1/2".  I think it's been mismarked--no other conclusion seems possible.

Redsetter,

Here's a pic of another 103 B code sight.
How many 103 sights do you think Lyman intentionally mismarked?
       Wink

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #20 - Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:59pm
Print Post  
slumlord44 wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:14pm:
Yes, but it has less range of adjustment than the 103. Hard to find a decent picture of one anywhere. There is an H marked 103 currently on Ebay.  1 1/2" hole spacing and the stem height looks close to mine. It has the correct graduated marked collar on the stem. Looks like it would work well on a 418 or Favorite. Tempting depending on how high it goes. H is for some Marlin's.


H is supposed to mean Marlin, but why should it have that spacing?  Do Marlin lever guns have that spacing?  I thought they had Ballard spacing.

I have an extremely well made Parker tang sight with the same kind of windage adjustment as these 144s.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #21 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:02am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:19pm:
Redsetter wrote Quote:
...Anyway, hole spacing is 1-1/2".  I think it's been mismarked--no other conclusion seems possible.

Redsetter,

Here's a pic of another 103 B code sight.
How many 103 sights do you think Lyman intentionally mismarked?
      



Guess I can't put it on ebay as "super-rare factory error."  But if it's not a factory error, what is it?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #22 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:08am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 11:16pm:
Slumlord44,

Here is a pic of an early 103 version.
Note the presense of the patent date...


Glad to see that--would be easy to overlook.  However, it's not on either of the two I have.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #23 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:13am
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote Quote:
H is supposed to mean Marlin, but why should it have that spacing?  Do Marlin lever guns have that spacing?  I thought they had Ballard spacing.

You might want to go back and re-read the last paragraph of Reply #7 ...
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #24 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:21am
Print Post  
BP, What is the patent date on yours? Sure looks like my oddball with a different stem.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #25 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:55am
Print Post  
Slumlord44,

Looks like PAT APR 18 16    so April 18th 1916.
I think this matches with the Lyman 102 Range Control sight date.
If you look really closely at the barrel and stem in the picture I posted of the early 103, and then look at an illustration of the Lyman 102, the elevation staffs look exactly the same.
The threads were eccentrically cut into the early version 103 stems.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #26 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:25am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:13am:
Redsetter wrote Quote:
H is supposed to mean Marlin, but why should it have that spacing?  Do Marlin lever guns have that spacing?  I thought they had Ballard spacing.

You might want to go back and re-read the last paragraph of Reply #7 ...


If you're saying that the B-marked 103s were intended for Marlins that had to be D&T for the 1-1/2" Stevens spacing, then why would the chart show H as the code for 103s applied to Marlins?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #27 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:25pm
Print Post  
My patent date is the same as yours which should make it early. The front to back measurement just below the windage adjustment and above the base is .835 on mine. What is yours?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #28 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 2:16pm
Print Post  
For connoisseurs of 103s only:  the first announcement of the sight, inserted as a separate page into my 1916 catalog; that makes sense, 1916 being the pat. date.  But why does my 1914 catalog have the same page?  Could of course have been inserted at some date after 1914, but I have my doubts about that.  Sometimes, rarely, a product is put into production before the patent on it is granted...there can be legal delays in the patenting procedure, etc.  Did that happen here???
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lyman 103 variations
Reply #29 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 5:22pm
Print Post  
Slumlord44 wrote Quote:
The front to back measurement just below the windage adjustment and above the base is .835 on mine. What is yours?

Slumlord44,

The early 103 sample I have measures closer to 0.825", while the later 103s I measured average 0.905"

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Send TopicPrint