Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Enfield Martini question (Read 16927 times)
Bad_Ass_Wallace
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 150
Location: Kingaroy, Australia
Joined: Jul 29th, 2005
Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #15 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:03pm
Print Post  
Harry,
It takes a great man to admit a small mistake!  Cheesy
  

Hold still varmint; while I plugs yer!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
graduated peep
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #16 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:44pm
Print Post  
My wife taught me that !!
If she's upset, I automatically say- whatever it is, I'm sorry ! Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
harry_eales
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #17 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:49pm
Print Post  
GP,
I'm just off to bed in my part of the world, I have to be up very early in order to get to hospital early in the morning for 7 hours Chemotherapy. I'll get back to you tomorrow evening.

Lefty 38.55,
In English terminology 'Ball ammo' is standard issue live loaded rounds for shooting at the enemy. As opposed to blank rounds or shot shells which may be used for civilian riot control.

Harry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
harry_eales
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #18 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 4:56pm
Print Post  
Hello GP,

I had a look at the website but couldn't find the rifle so i presume it has been sold or withdrawn. A great pity as I would have liked to view what was written about it. The double arrows do signify that it was withdrawn from government possession and legally sold. I note that the same sign appears several times on the barrel. The two initials adjacent to the Arrowheads are probably the inspectors initials who was responsible for withdrawing the rifle from active service. Victorian Inspectors both at the Proof Houses and military establishments seem to get a power complex when issued with a metal stamp and hammer.  The 'Not for Ball' means is precisely that, it would be restricted perhaps for Drill Purposes or the firing of Blank rounds, or possibly it had been re-bored to a larger size to fire buckshot rounds, for police usage in the colonies. The original 577/450 used such ammo and each round contained 10 buckshot pellets. Hence my search for more information on the website you took it from. The ME initials is merely Martini Enfield. I've never seen either a rifle of this model marked 'Not For Ball' in any book or photograph and I have never met a MH with these stampings myself. It would have been nice to have had more information.

Regards,

Harry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
harry_eales
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #19 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 5:13pm
Print Post  
Bad_Ass_Wallace wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:03pm:
Harry,
It takes a great man to admit a small mistake!  Cheesy


Hello BAW,
Long time no see here, nice to have you back. I wasn't criticising GP, but merely chiding him jokingly and I hope he took it that way. I doubt if many Americans could (off the top of their heads) name the last ten kings and queens of England. Likewise I doubt if many Englishmen could name the last ten or twenty US Presidents. They come and go with monotonous regularity. If GP is upset by my comments then I unreservedly apologise, no insult was intended. A little harmless banter doesn't do any harm, it's called humour over here. Roll Eyes

Regards,

Harry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bad_Ass_Wallace
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 150
Location: Kingaroy, Australia
Joined: Jul 29th, 2005
Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #20 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 5:34pm
Print Post  
Harry, 
Spent my time away wisely, a few trips to hospital, but I managed to find a few nice Martini's!

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

Hold still varmint; while I plugs yer!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
graduated peep
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #21 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 7:29am
Print Post  
Quote:
Bad_Ass_Wallace wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:03pm:
Harry,
It takes a great man to admit a small mistake!  Cheesy


Hello BAW,
Long time no see here, nice to have you back. I wasn't criticising GP, but merely chiding him jokingly and I hope he took it that way. I doubt if many Americans could (off the top of their heads) name the last ten kings and queens of England. Likewise I doubt if many Englishmen could name the last ten or twenty US Presidents. They come and go with monotonous regularity. If GP is upset by my comments then I unreservedly apologise, no insult was intended. A little harmless banter doesn't do any harm, it's called humour over here. Roll Eyes

Regards,

Harry

Harry, not offended at ALL !!
If that's the worst I ever get accused of, well then, I'm not doing doing my job !  Grin
Regarding my regal faux pas earlier, I honestly KNEW it was Victoria; but for some reason I got Elizabeth in my brain.
And I do know a little Martini history too.
I have read about O'Rourke's Drift where that small band of brave troopers held off the attacking African natives with their Martini-Henrys.
I believe it was  that same fellow-  Sergeant O'Rourke who played next to Corporal Agarn in that historically accurate US TV series F-Troop back in the 1960's Roll Eyes

Regarding US presidents, some should be readily identifiable as we like to put their mugs on our currency. And since we are so good at throwing it around all over the world, the likes of Grant, Lincoln and Jackson should be familiar even in the remotest of outposts !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
graduated peep
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #22 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 7:33am
Print Post  
Quote:
Hello GP,

I had a look at the website but couldn't find the rifle so i presume it has been sold or withdrawn. A great pity as I would have liked to view what was written about it. The double arrows do signify that it was withdrawn from government possession and legally sold. I note that the same sign appears several times on the barrel. The two initials adjacent to the Arrowheads are probably the inspectors initials who was responsible for withdrawing the rifle from active service. Victorian Inspectors both at the Proof Houses and military establishments seem to get a power complex when issued with a metal stamp and hammer.  The 'Not for Ball' means is precisely that, it would be restricted perhaps for Drill Purposes or the firing of Blank rounds, or possibly it had been re-bored to a larger size to fire buckshot rounds, for police usage in the colonies. The original 577/450 used such ammo and each round contained 10 buckshot pellets. Hence my search for more information on the website you took it from. The ME initials is merely Martini Enfield. I've never seen either a rifle of this model marked 'Not For Ball' in any book or photograph and I have never met a MH with these stampings myself. It would have been nice to have had more information.

Regards,

Harry


Harry- Here is a link to the firearm that I borrowed the photos from:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

My own M-H .303 Artillery carbine has "D.P." stamped on it as well as "N.Z."
I would guess that it was issued to a facility in New Zealand, and was used for drill purposes. And judging from the condition of the wood and poor bore, they must have drilled the Hell out of it !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #23 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 11:19am
Print Post  
Those M-E Mk II Artillery Carbines appear to be more widely distributed than I ever imagined.  I have one, picked up about 1998 in wretched condition.  My specimen is marked 1893 on one side and 1897 on the other.  No DP or other markings, only a Broad Arrow.

My late friend & I took it out with some mild hand-loads, hard-cast 200 grain bullets at some 1800 fps.  Our target was a cardboard box some 15 yards away.  3 test shots all went through the box sideways.  We took it back to my friend's shop and took it apart.  Buttstock was rotten, punky with saturated oil, forearm not much better.  Barrel was hopeless, like a sewer, with a couple of bulges. Trigger pull was ghastly, 18 lbs.  The only redeeming feature was the breech block, which had been bushed and fitted with a smaller firing pin back in 1897.  Then we discovered the secret to M-E restoration.

My friend had a SMLE in pieces in his shop.  We thought the buttstocks were similar, so we tried parts replacement.  A perfect fit.  Just needed to have a hole cut out for the end of the lever and the little brass cup installed.  Looking in more detail, we found that all the SMLE parts could be fitted to the Martini action with very little effort.   

The SMLE wood for the fore-end went into a miter box.  We cut it just in front of the magazine well.  After that, it was just a matter of installing the original fore-end hanger.

Lee-Enfield barrels are the same as Martini-Enfield barrels, a screw-in fit, requiring only a file cut to allow the extractor to fit properly.  All the rest of the SMLE parts, the rear sight, hand guard and all the iron mongery, fitted properly.   

My friend worked over the trigger, glass bedded the upper wood and we took it to the range.  Results were amazing.  We had a couple of boxes of Winchester 1980s vintage military ammo.  Off sandbags, we got a couple of 4-inch groups at 100 yards the first time out.  The message here is that some of the mountain of SMLE parts will fit easily.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
graduated peep
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #24 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 12:36pm
Print Post  
Waterman,
Thank you very much for the info.
The wood on my AC isn't rotten, just dented all to H---.
The bore is dark, but does have clear rifling all the way through with no obvious bulges or other damage past what the corrosive ammo did to it.
I have yet to shoot any groups with it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
harry_eales
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #25 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:35am
Print Post  

Harry- Here is a link to the firearm that I borrowed the photos from:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

My own M-H .303 Artillery carbine has "D.P." stamped on it as well as "N.Z."
I would guess that it was issued to a facility in New Zealand, and was used for drill purposes. And judging from the condition of the wood and poor bore, they must have drilled the Hell out of it ! [/quote]

Hello GP,

Your correct about the DP and NZ markings. The other proof markings are pretty much standard looking
the British Army and Colonial Drill Sergeants loved the crunch of metal rifle butts hitting the parade ground in unison. That's what knocked the heck out of them. The chances are the interior of the barrels weren't cleaned for years and at best an oily rag was wiped over the exposed exterior metal. No need to clean the interior as it hadn't been fired.

They were still doing this drill with all issue battle rifles until our troops were issued the 5.56 mm SA 80 which is simply not long enough to reach the ground.

I do wish that sellers of firearms would take a little time just to rub a piece of blackboard chalk over the proof marks then wipe the surplus off leaving a contrasting colouration which does show up the markings a lot more clearly. A quick rub with a small brush will remove the chalk instantly with no harm done. It's a pity it wasn't better cared for in the past rust on the top of a breechblock is rather hard to ignore even when the rusting is stopped. I do note that he didn't comment on the 'Not For Ball' stamping which must be the most obvious of them all.

Harry


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rdixiemiller
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #26 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 10:00pm
Print Post  

Lee-Enfield barrels are the same as Martini-Enfield barrels, a screw-in fit, requiring only a file cut to allow the extractor to fit properly.



Did you need to rechamber the SMLE barrel?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #27 - Mar 19th, 2014 at 2:40am
Print Post  
It has been awhile since the rifle was put together, but I don't think a chamber reamer was necessary. The barrel used on mine came off a SMLE in the parts pile. Headspace gauges of some sort would be necessary.

If you bought a barrel that had not been on a rifle, the chamber reamer might be necessary.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rdixiemiller
Ex Member


Re: Enfield Martini question
Reply #28 - Mar 23rd, 2014 at 9:50pm
Print Post  
Thanks. I have an old commercial 303 action that would be fun to build up in 303.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint