Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Weighing bullets - process control (Read 47193 times)
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11473
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #30 - Nov 23rd, 2013 at 10:07pm
Print Post  
I always drop the sprues back in the pot. My bullets get heavier as the mold heats up.  When the mold comes up to temp and I don't get distracted, have had batches of bullets weigh out to about six tenths variation in weight.
Now days seldom weigh bullets. 

           Joe.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #31 - Nov 23rd, 2013 at 10:34pm
Print Post  
I find your 10 grain variance by changing your hold closed pressure on your handles interesting. How much further past closed can one close their mould blocks? That subject in itself has always interested me as it I have found it to be impossible based on my experience. I can't help but think of it as how much open from fully closed would create a 10 grain variance while still not having lead flowing in between the mould halves? 

JLouis
« Last Edit: Nov 23rd, 2013 at 10:42pm by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #32 - Nov 23rd, 2013 at 11:14pm
Print Post  
would small temp variations in the molten alloy = have an effect on the molten lead density?   I wonder if the mold block temps /expansion might have an effect on the way the cavity halves fit and perhaps the cavity dimensions.
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
shovel80
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 896
Location: Sonora,CA
Joined: Jun 6th, 2011
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #33 - Nov 23rd, 2013 at 11:57pm
Print Post  
I think the mold getting hotter, expands making the bullets heavier...I know for me, if my bullets start to get too heavy....I give another second or two in my count before I open the handles and let the bullet out....If I have to stop casting for some reason...I have a elec. hot plate on hi that I set the mold onto. I also use it to heat the mold before casting, but, I normally still  have to run about 10 or 12 bullets through the mold, heating it up  before I get the bullets comming out at the "Normal" weight for that mold...

Terry
  

ASSRA Member # 11021
Back to top
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #34 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 12:05am
Print Post  
DW expansion and contraction I would think would be based on the rate of rise and or drop in block temperature and well beyond my abilities to calculate. I do think for our use being based on the mass involved it would be so miniscul that it would be almost unmeasurable? When casting the temp. is always on the rise and or stable as one moves along at a rapid pace so where would there be an extreme enough drop in tempreture during this process take place. I have only found it to take place by putting the sprues back in the pot while casting and that variable is easily eliminated.

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #35 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 12:15am
Print Post  
I beleave the very sight increase in weight is due to better fill out. If you look close at those first ten or so typically the grease grooves and bands are not completly filled out and sharp. Again just my personnel experience over the past 12+ years. This can also hold true for the bases depending on the mould as each one is just a little different and has to be treated as such.

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joeb33050
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2613
Location: Marathon, FL
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #36 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 4:26am
Print Post  
My records of visually inspected cast bullet weights of 26,948 bullets, from 58.5 gr. to 445.3 gr., has an average standard deviation of .155 grains. 
Standard deviation varied from .062 to .309 grains, variation had much to do with casting technique-my fault and generally identified as such.
The standard deviation doesn't seem to vary MUCH with average weight. 2 cavity molds are marked to identify bullet to cavity, bullets are sorted by cavity, bullet weight varies, consistently, by cavity. 
Average lot size is 110 bullets, a lot = from a cavity at one casting session.
John Alexander at the CBA doesn't weigh or pay a lot of attention to visual defects, and shoots very well. 
Weighing bullets after visual inspection at 4X lets me identify the very few visually acceptable but weight-outlier bullets. 
Repeated testing has failed to show that accuracy varies with bullet variation within +/-3s. Bullets weighing XXX.Y grains shoot no better than bullets weighing XXX.0 to XXX.9 grains.
You will find that good bullets shot in the order cast do NOT shoot more accurately than good bullets segregated by lot.
You will find that bullet weights varying +/- 3s, where 3s = .5 grains when X bar ~ 200 gr do NOT shoot less accurately than bullet weights with the same tenths digit.
You WILL find that weighing bullets and calculating s DOES help you to control casting variation by showing you WHAT causes variation.
I have an excel workbook that automatically calculates s and x bar and records data, available to all. 

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2917
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #37 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 7:08am
Print Post  
march41 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2013 at 8:33pm:
SSS- do your 40cal 360s take down Rams well?Or do the 450s work a lot better.Are both creedmore type bullets.I am using 360 saecos that weigh 370gr and vary about 1gr.From the bench I can't see any difference in 200yd groups.I am pushing these at 1340fps. Any info would help. Bob,in PA.

The small mold is a Saeco 640, which casts a 370gr bullet using 20-1 and I've not shot it at the rams. Do shoot both a 400gr & 450gr BACo 'Money' bullet at the longer distances and both are fine at the rams. Am loading 58gr of 2F Swiss and will guess that they are both going ~1300fps, but have not crony'd. Just getting started on the 40cal. The 38cal am shooting a 325gr & 365gr BACo 'Money' bullet as well as a 340gr Brooks 'Money' bullet and all are going 1375-1425fps and have not rung a ram with any of them in 2 1/2 seasons. 

Recently read an article in an old BP Cartridge News or SSRJ (forgotten which) by someone who was shooting heavy 38cal bullets (which are long) and a similar weight 40cal bullet (which are shorter) and was ringing an occasional ram with the 40cal. His thinking was the long bullet would impart more momentum to the hit than the shorter one. 
  

Glenn - 2x CPA 44 1/2 w/22LR (Shilen ratchet-rifled & Bartlein 5R rifled), 38-40RH & 38-55WCF (Bartlein 5R rifled) & 40-65WCF (GrnMtn 'X') barrels
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #38 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:14am
Print Post  
Quote:
The average is 405.6gr (scale indicates only to one decimal place) with the spread going from 403.5 to 407.1gr.

The bell curve can be tightened up ...

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
100 bullets (9.5x47R) ladle cast with Accurate mold
Heated the pot up to 780 degrees - (the keys to small bell curve = cast with a 5 second pour - sprue puddle frost in 7 seconds) and the results:
* 04 bullets = 209.8 - 209.9 
* 96 bullets = 210.4 - 210.8
Cast with a constant: melt temperature, 5 second pour time, frost time (5 - 10 seconds depending on weight) and with a uniform rhythm for small bell curve weights
« Last Edit: Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:40am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #39 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:38am
Print Post  
DW
Yes the rise and fall of temperature in an electric pots cycle does affect the weight of the bullet, as does the temperature of the mold. The simple fact that the bullets grow heavier from the first bullets cast to the last tells us that. I do not know how much the weight difference comes from the blocks heating enough for more metal to enter before they cool and stop letting more in and the blocks expanding to allow more. I have a scale that measures to 100ths of a grain and I can follow the cycle as I weigh my bullets. 

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3878
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #40 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:43am
Print Post  
John -  cool!  Describe in a bit more detail about 'constant pour time'.  Pouring directly into the hole or glancing off the funnel in the sprue plate or pressed directly to it?
Thanks!

Which scale are you using?
  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3878
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #41 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:47am
Print Post  
40_Rod wrote on Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:38am:
DW
Yes the rise and fall of temperature in an electric pots cycle does affect the weight of the bullet, as does the temperature of the mold. The simple fact that the bullets grow heavier from the first bullets cast to the last tells us that. I do not know how much the weight difference comes from the blocks heating enough for more metal to enter before they cool and stop letting more in and the blocks expanding to allow more. I have a scale that measures to 100ths of a grain and I can follow the cycle as I weigh my bullets.
40 Rod



Which scale?  The weight variation due to temperature variation is not obvious on my charts, but that doesn't mean it's not there as the other variation is so large.
  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3878
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #42 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:52am
Print Post  
JLouis wrote on Nov 24th, 2013 at 12:15am:
I beleave the very sight increase in weight is due to better fill out. If you look close at those first ten or so typically the grease grooves and bands are not completly filled out and sharp. Again just my personnel experience over the past 12+ years. This can also hold true for the bases depending on the mould as each one is just a little different and has to be treated as such.

JLouis


Agree.  Might also there be an effect of the volume of the alloy expanding with temperature AND the dimensions of the cavity varying with the temperature of the mould.  Which has the greater affect?
  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3878
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #43 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:54am
Print Post  
joeb33050 wrote on Nov 24th, 2013 at 4:26am:

...
You WILL find that weighing bullets and calculating s DOES help you to control casting variation by showing you WHAT causes variation.
...


Yup.  That's what this thread is about.  One detail at a time.
  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2917
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: Weighing bullets - process control
Reply #44 - Nov 24th, 2013 at 8:55am
Print Post  
With my most recent casting of 340gr 38cal bullets and 400gr 40cal bullets was able to hold +/-0.2gr for 98% of the bullets. I give credit to 1.) casting consistency - doing it the same every time (just like shooting Wink), and, 2.) using a PID control and and Type K TC to run the pot. The PID controller is one of the 'fuzzy logic' learning type of controllers (~$35 with an SSA - solid-state relay on eBay). Bought the TC from Omega Engineering and it was about the same w/shipping. For $70 have a modern feedback control system and do not have to pay attention to pot level. Will generally cast 100 bullets and then take a break and feed the pot. 

Have learned recently that there is a big difference between molds. The BACo molds, which are a large block, heat quickly and maintain a stable temp quite well. The Brooks mold is a smaller block and takes 15-20 bullets to stabilize, but is great after that. The Saeco 640 40cal mold is easiest/fastest to use. Rereading the notes on each mold before starting to cast makes things go faster. YMMV.
  

Glenn - 2x CPA 44 1/2 w/22LR (Shilen ratchet-rifled & Bartlein 5R rifled), 38-40RH & 38-55WCF (Bartlein 5R rifled) & 40-65WCF (GrnMtn 'X') barrels
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
Send TopicPrint