Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) To drill & tap or not to drill & tap (Read 38187 times)
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11521
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #45 - Nov 18th, 2013 at 11:56am
Print Post  
I use a full length Parsons scope on my sixty pound slug gun. Have to be very careful when handling it. One little bump could damage the scope severely. 

       Joe.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16290
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #46 - Nov 18th, 2013 at 11:43pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Nov 17th, 2013 at 2:42pm:

Well, what about Stevens owners who bought their guns before Stevens began building scopes in 1902, or who "had to think awhile" before shelling out for a scope that cost half as much, or more, than their gun?  Might they not have returned their barrels for D&T?  Or even if they were drilled by some local gunsmith, how much less "original" is such a gun?  

First Stevens mounts weren't attached by blocks--they were screwed directly to the brl., so the owner had to be fairly committed to the use of a scope.  Detachable mounts & blocks came in 1904--in fact, Stevens invented them.


Those installed before we get the guns are unknown, so I'm not sure what your point is? It's impossible to say which are factory, and which are gunsmith mounted, or if they were done after they left the factory, or returned to be factory D&T. 
Only those with no rear dovetail, and a Stevens scope could possibly fall into the factory installed situation, but since there's no records we don't even know for sure on them.
My point is I would not D&T an old gun for a scope or sights, even if I could do it exactly how the maker did. I just don't want to modify an original, unless the gun was already messed with, or far from decent condition.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #47 - Nov 19th, 2013 at 10:44am
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Nov 18th, 2013 at 11:43pm:
[quote author=0E39382F392828392E5C0 link=1384522964/38#38 date=1384717342]
Only those with no rear dovetail, and a Stevens scope could possibly fall into the factory installed situation, but since there's no records we don't even know for sure on them.


I can only say that your definition of "factory installed situation" is far more restrictive than mine.  I think it's reasonable to regard any gun returned to the factory for modification as equally as "original" as another gun that left the factory in that particular configuration. (Such as a Stevens barrel with a slot returned for D&T.)  Not only is such a factory-modified gun 100% original, in my estimation, it is to me far more interesting because, compared to an unmodified piece, it has a "history"--the original owner used the gun, thought of ways to improve it, had the work done.  Mint guns, suggesting little or no use, are certainly worth more than those with a "history," but personally I find them boring.

One of my own favorites is a Low Wall that left the factory in 22 Short & was returned a few years later to be rebarreled in Long Rifle. I like it better knowing some previous owner took the trouble to have this work done.  This barrel is D&T, with markings at 1 o'clock, & a rear sight slot--which Win. actually charged EXTRA to omit--so I have no idea whether the blocks are original; factory records don't say so, but they are often incomplete.  (This gun is shown on p. 58 & 108 of Campbell, Vol. 1; how I got it, a long story.)
« Last Edit: Nov 19th, 2013 at 1:33pm by Redsetter »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16290
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #48 - Nov 20th, 2013 at 11:41am
Print Post  
What I was trying to communicate is that those without a dovetail would be more likely to be factory, not that they were the only Stevens that were factory. Or that I didn't accept a Stevens as factory if it was done on a return trip.
I have no issue with a factory d&t gun, even if it was sent back later and done. But there's just no way to know a Stevens was done at the factory new, or later. No records were kept, so how would one know when, or by whom the d&t was done?
On other makes of guns some factories kept better records, and any return trip was added to that serial number's history. So if it's recorded it actually adds history to the gun, and in my opinion value too. The more info that can be documented on a gun, the better in my opinion. Most collectors will agree that documented history is much better than speculation.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #49 - Nov 20th, 2013 at 4:25pm
Print Post  
Good points Val.
The Westinghouse fire near the end of WWI that destroyed most of the Stevens records makes a determination of factory work performed on a specific firearm a difficult task at best.
The WRA records that exist have their gaps and often omit a number of details.
I don't think it is all that easy to get letters detailing the work performed on specific firearms by Schoyen and the other old masters either.
We all hear plenty of stories, many that are quite amusing, about the supposed history of a firearm that a seller wants to move off of their table at a show and elsewhere, but verifable provenance is hard to come by.
Just because the factory could have done it, and the work appears to conform to factory standards, don't make it true.
Buyer beware.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #50 - Nov 20th, 2013 at 9:47pm
Print Post  
BP, well said. I think that is part of what makes this hobby so interesting. Some things can be documented, much more cannot. "If they could only talk" it would sure make things easy. I buy what I like. Try not to pay a premium for something that cannot be documented. Sometimes pay the premium anyway just because I like the gun. For example, I have a Stevens Favorite with what I think is a factory checkered stock. No way to prove it for sure but I bought it because I liked it and did pay a little more than I should have. Stevens is one of the toughest to document because of lack of factory records and a lot of model differences are in the sights, which can be changed at any point in time. It this was easy and simple it would not be nearly as much fun.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #51 - Nov 20th, 2013 at 11:43pm
Print Post  
slumlord44 wrote on Nov 20th, 2013 at 9:47pm:
Sometimes pay the premium anyway just because I like the gun.


You ain't alone.  

Before I'd learned enough to trust my own judgment, going "by the book" caused me to turn away from some rare guns (like, possibly, that checkered Favorite) which turned up at shows because they didn't conform to what was supposed to be "right."  (A M1922 Springfield stocked as a service rifle, a Low Wall with an experimental take-down mechanism, & others I'd like to forget.)  Because someone knew the right people in a factory, or worked there themselves, or merely because money talks, there are plenty of "undocumented" guns in circulation.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #52 - Nov 21st, 2013 at 12:07am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Nov 20th, 2013 at 4:25pm:
Just because the factory could have done it, and the work appears to conform to factory standards, don't make it true.
Buyer beware.



Don't make it true, but (given what you said) it DOES make it possible & plausible.  Here's where experience & good judgment come into play--if the gun looks "right," untampered with & so forth, I think it deserves the benefit of the doubt.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7575
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #53 - Nov 21st, 2013 at 5:20pm
Print Post  
I guess it depends on the specifics , am not a dealer and don't expect to make profit on any gun. Buy and use what I like that’s all, don't use it get rid of it. They all sell sometime might as well be when I am through with the gun.

In a trade paired with something else I acquired an altered Ballard,  CC Johnson, everybody told me it was collectable and we know the Johnson barreled guns will shoot. Sat unsold for several years until it passed on to a friend of mine at a good price. He's very happy with it & how it shoots, but had it been unaltered it would have sold in weeks not years.

Just bought a Parker VH 12 gauge shotgun, large dealer 75 Parkers for sale, at least a dozen VH's with the configuration I wanted.  Ended up passing on all the altered and restored guns for all original untouched.  At least 500 dollars more than the same gun with non factory recoil pads even more that 500 spread than Parkers with cut barrels or altered chokes.  Restored worse than altered they were priced half original finish guns. Dealer told me untouched goes fast altered sits and waits for the bargain shopper.

Same dealer last year had a fairly nice High Wall in 32/40, recently drilled for scope blocks, he was anxious to move the gun been on his racks for a long time. Friend of mine who is not a collector bought it to shoot for what I think is a very good price. No blocks would have been a lot more and sold quick.

That's  my limited experence, take it for what it cost.

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16290
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #54 - Nov 21st, 2013 at 8:38pm
Print Post  
I've got some untouched guns, and I've got some highly modified guns, and I love them all! I can't even say I'd rather have a bone stock, unchanged gun, as that would eliminate almost every schuetzen style rifle I own, as almost all were modified a little or a lot!
I have to look at each gun and decide if it's what I want, and the price is commensurate with the condition, changes, and collectability. I actually love old guns with period scopes, and own a few, but I take into consideration that most are likely modified after they left the factory. I think those holes hurt the gun's value, but I also feel that if a correct era scope is still in place it offsets the extra holes.
I purchased a Ballard #6 that was gunsmithed long ago, and had a Stevens scope on it, with Pope rings and bases. It also has a .22 Short Winchester 1885 barrel, and numerous other changes. But I was excited to get it, regardless of how far from factory it was, and I still enjoy it. 
Sometimes changes add value to a stock gun, but they have to all go together. The quality of the work, all the features added up, and when those modifications were done, help me decide if I like the rifle or not. Most important ( at least to me!) is when the changes were done. I'm not too interested in one that was modified last year, but early last century (or before!) really gets my juices flowing! Smiley
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #55 - Nov 21st, 2013 at 8:52pm
Print Post  
I have to agree with Marlin guy. Guns with period correct modifications sometimes interest me as much as an original depending on condition, price, and rarity. My Stevens Bisley Model has a Parker Hale liner and British Martini sights and I would not part with it because it is an extremely rare model and the modifications were done in England back in the day and the gun was made specifically for the British market.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #56 - Nov 21st, 2013 at 10:56pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Nov 21st, 2013 at 8:38pm:
  Most important ( at least to me!) is when the changes were done.


Well, yes--that goes without saying!: the work done before the gun became a "collector's item."  

I've got & use a variety of Stevens scopes, but have never even seen Pope mounts offered for sale; just as well I guess, as they'd be unusable without a barrel milled to fit them.  Equally scarce, & superior, I think, in its operation, was Stevens #4 Double Micrometer, one of which I found after years of searching.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #57 - Nov 22nd, 2013 at 1:12am
Print Post  
westerner wrote Quote:
I use a full length Parsons scope on my sixty pound slug gun. Have to be very careful when handling it. One little bump could damage the scope severely. 

       Joe.

Joe,
I can see where a sixty pound slug gun falling on top of a long scope would do some damage.       Wink

Go with lighter weight rifles and the Parsons long scopes hold up just fine.
Here's two long scopes on two different Stevens rifles, all dovetail mounted, and they handle just fine when stretching my legs out in the woods...
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11521
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #58 - Nov 22nd, 2013 at 1:54am
Print Post  
At sixty pounds, no drop needed. Just a little bump on the scope could cause damage.  One sixty pounder is enough, trust me. I like the shorter scopes in any event. Needed the long scope to fit my rifles mounts. I like the Parsons optic better than the MVAs.
I also have a long Stevens scope with nice optics but cant get the crosshairs clear. Don't know how to adjust it.
Might be my right eye. Having trouble seeing any crosshairs. 

      Joe. 

  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: To drill & tap or not to drill & tap
Reply #59 - Nov 22nd, 2013 at 3:16am
Print Post  
Joe,

Know what you mean, 60 pounds has too much mass to move when you bump the scope. 
The optics of the Parsons long scopes are nice and brite compared to others.
Don't know what Stevens long scope you have but here are the instructions from my old Stevens Scope catalogue:

       INSTRUCTIONS
       All telescopes are furnished with cross-hairs. If, after the telescope is mounted, the cross-hairs do not stand perfectly level, unscrew the eye-cup and draw out the eye piece far enough to grasp with thumb and finger, then turn to proper place and push back, screwing down cap firmly. The letters UP marked on the brass tube, indicate which way the tube should be placed. The eye piece can easily be drawn out with a knife blade inserted in the groove in extreme end of brass tube. The eye piece should never be taken apart, as there is little or no chance of dirt getting inside. The eye-lens can be cleaned without removing it.
       No. 368 telescope has external adjustment of cross-hairs, forward of rear mount. Loosen the screw and move forward or back to focus and to right or left to level the cross-hairs.
       The object lens (in forward end of tube) should be taken out and cleaned occasionally. This can be done by removing the front cap and stop pin; remove focusing screw (if it is a focusing telescope), insert finger and draw out brass tube. Clean with a piece of worn cotton cloth, or linen handkerchief. If the forward end of tube is fitted with a cork, it will keep the telescope comparatively free from dirt.


Don't know if they will help, but they do give a fun glimpse into times past. 
          Smiley

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
Send TopicPrint