Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action? (Read 8657 times)
Poorhouse
Junior Member
**
Offline


NRA Life, ASSRA Life

Posts: 87
Location: New Hampster
Joined: Aug 1st, 2007
Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
May 8th, 2013 at 8:44pm
Print Post  
Once upon a time Winchester would refinish Hiwall actions and/or perform heat treatment on them.  I have an original  late thick-wall takedown action that has never been used (or blued) with no proofmark and is dead soft.  Is there prevailing wisdom on what heat treatment is recommended? Most shops want to know the composition of the steel Winchester was using when the action was made, which seems to be a topic of contention.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mike_Hunter
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 386
Joined: Nov 5th, 2008
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2013 at 10:38pm
Print Post  
Well it all depends on what you mean by a "late high-wall action"

If it's an original Pre-1930s Winchester made action, then I know the metal composition; if its one of the newer made actions 1990 and after... I don't have a clue.

Since I do a bit of CCH, I needed to know what the old actions were made of,  took several actions cut them up and had them tested. 

v/r

Mike
  

Mike Hunter
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Poorhouse
Junior Member
**
Offline


NRA Life, ASSRA Life

Posts: 87
Location: New Hampster
Joined: Aug 1st, 2007
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #2 - May 8th, 2013 at 11:22pm
Print Post  
I believe this to be an original action, as it has correct Winchester markings on the upper tang.  Gary Quinlan believes there was a last batch of the thick-wall takedown actions that Winchester never made into rifles.  Perhaps this action is one of those? There are no signs of use that I can see.  Also, no signs that any finish was ever present.  Gunsmith here tested for hardness and sez dead soft.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FITZ
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


REGARDS

Posts: 917
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #3 - May 9th, 2013 at 6:10pm
Print Post  
Poorhouse, I have one of those actions. Thickside, Coil Spring, Takedown. Got it in an auction with a very used 30-40 Krag barrel. What appeared to be a factory Blue on the action. I mated it up to a 32-40 Takedown and have been shooting it for 5 Years, no problems. Unless you are planning on some Hot Rod caliber it will be quite safe with Schuetzen loads of soft lead and moderate loads. The Model 1885 got it's strength from Robust design not Heat Treat. Consider how many Varmint Rifles were built using Winder Musket recievers which are also dead soft.  Hiwalls have more square inches of support of the breech block than a modern Bolt action. HTH
Regards, FITZ. Smiley
  

FITZ
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Poorhouse
Junior Member
**
Offline


NRA Life, ASSRA Life

Posts: 87
Location: New Hampster
Joined: Aug 1st, 2007
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #4 - May 9th, 2013 at 8:50pm
Print Post  
I am considering chambering for .303 British with hunting in mind.  Although I don't load to high-pressure, I wouldn't feel comfortable with a dead-soft action.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7658
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #5 - May 11th, 2013 at 11:43am
Print Post  
Mike,
Could you tell us what the results were of the analyse?

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
creedmoormatch
Ex Member


Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #6 - May 12th, 2013 at 7:48am
Print Post  
Quote:
Once upon a time Winchester would refinish Hiwall actions and/or perform heat treatment on them.


Poor-House---
                   Would it not be appropriate to take your concerns directly to the Customer Service department at the Winchester Repeating Arms Co for their consideration and disposition?

If I were facing the same fact situation, I would be seeking qualified guidance and direction from the manufacturer of the product.

  C.M.M.
.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mike_Hunter
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 386
Joined: Nov 5th, 2008
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #7 - May 12th, 2013 at 10:13am
Print Post  
Creedmoor

I doubt calling Winchester about a frame would provide any results. I that frame is an original 1885, the company thet manufactured it is loooong gone.

Remember in the late 20s/30 Winchester sold out to the Olin corp, then in the 60s the Olin corp leased the name to US Repeating arms, and finally in 2010 or so the actual buildings closed down, and are currently bening torn down by the city of New Haven.  The only thing remaining of Winchester is the name, which is being leased by the same company theat owns Browning and FN. 

As to the actual composition of the frames, yes, I cut up about half a dozen frames, 1886, 1892, 1894s and had them sent off to a lab to have analysed.  It was not cheap.  Not something that I would be willing to put out on the internet for all to have... Hey..it cost me a couple of grand!

Then about a year ago, at no minor expense, I purchased Winchester's "materials" manual, which lists all the materials and heat treatment of the component parts of Winchester firearms made 1895-1920. 



  

Mike Hunter
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7658
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #8 - May 12th, 2013 at 12:39pm
Print Post  
four of us on this forum did the work for the BP vs smokeless Remington RB's. for all to use. There is really no advantage to knowing, other than safety.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Dr Tom
Ex Member


Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #9 - May 12th, 2013 at 1:13pm
Print Post  
Frank - That's not quite true. To heat treat correctly, one needs to know the composition of the steel used in each part. 

Mike - Case hardened parts need to be cut to determine the composition of the steel underneath, but the region affected can be quite small. Parts that have not been case hardened do not need to be cut, but may suffer some cosmetic damage to a region that is not visible when the action is assembled.

Poorhouse - If your action is dead soft and never used, a commercial metallurgical lab can determine the composition of each part without damaging it significantly. The problem is that some labs won't do firearms work except for government entities.

All - I don't know whether the late thick wall coil spring actions were based on surplus early low carbon steel forgings or later carbon-manganese steel ones. Does anybody know?

Tom
« Last Edit: May 12th, 2013 at 1:20pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7658
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #10 - May 12th, 2013 at 3:41pm
Print Post  
Tom,
Frank - That's not quite true. To heat treat correctly, one needs to know the composition of the steel used in each part.

Yes, and that is one of the things that is a safety issue. The basic strength of steel can be determined by it's hardness alone (excluding CCH) but, how malleable or brittle a steel is is best best determined by analyse as opposed to destuctive testing. High carbon content steels are not adviseable to CCH.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ziggy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 90
Location: Cordell
Joined: Sep 18th, 2007
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #11 - May 12th, 2013 at 4:39pm
Print Post  
Find a lab with an XRF it is a nondestructive way to do chemical analysis.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mike_Hunter
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 386
Joined: Nov 5th, 2008
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #12 - May 12th, 2013 at 8:30pm
Print Post  
Yes X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) can give ok results if the operator knows what they are doing and IF the steel is in it’s raw state, lots of scrap yards use them.

The problem with using XRF on firearm parts is that nearly all firearm parts have been heat treated in some way. 

Keep in mind that case hardening, and carbonia bluing were both heat treating and finishing methods.  Both methods added carbon to the outer surface of the steel, using XRF on these parts will give a false reading. 

He method that I chose was conducted by a major steel manufacturer using an Optical Emmision Spectrometer.  The pieces had to be 1x1 inch, about .010 was taken off the outside surfaces so that rust, any additional carbon added by heat treatment, and any other impurities were removed.  The pieces were then burnt and the exact composition was derived from the off gassing. 

The steel manufacturer that I used provides certification as to the steel composition,  something most XRF users won't do. 
  

Mike Hunter
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dr Tom
Ex Member


Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #13 - May 12th, 2013 at 11:58pm
Print Post  
Mike - Another good thing about cutting big pieces is that you can polish and etch some sections and look at grain size and direction in a light microscope. Come to think of it, one could polish and etch some of the flat surfaces of an action and determine the percentage of pearlite (and thereby know %C) by direct measurement. That might identify a HW frame as early or late, but wouldn't provide enough detail to fully prescribe the HT. Interesting, for sure.

PH - You have an interesting puzzle. Keep us posted. 

Tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Heat Treatment for Late Hi-Wall Action?
Reply #14 - May 13th, 2013 at 1:25am
Print Post  
Might be in the Winchester book by Madis that WRA ceased colorcase hardening receivers after about 1901. I remember reading that rifles with a color-cased receiver that were sent back to the factory for barrel rework after that time supposedly had the receiver re-heat-treated, blued, and had the WP definitive proof mark applied to the receiver, before the rifle was returned.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint