Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless? (Read 14351 times)
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #15 - Mar 3rd, 2011 at 2:05pm
Print Post  
Hello everyone, I don't mean to beat a dead horse but...I have some experiance loading/shooting a Stevens Mod. 49 on the 44 1/2 frame.  in .25-20 S.S.  I have shot it with a 96gr. Barnet breech-seated, Rocky Mtn. turned  brass case, Fed. match primer, 7.0gr. H4227.  This is a mild and accurate load.  Interestingly, that 7.0gr. charge is what I use in a .22 Hornet with cast for best accuracy.    Perhaps if I start light with this powder & work up carefully, I can find an accurate and safe low-pressure load.  4227 is like an old friend, have been using it in originals for over 30 years.  What do you guys think of this plan?  I can and will use black if you experts deem it safer..but I sure don't look forward to the fouling & clean-up in that little bore.  The main thing...as always when using modern smokeless  is to avoid a double-charge!  Thanks again!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #16 - Mar 3rd, 2011 at 10:55pm
Print Post  
Well, QuickLoad says that load would yield about 1050 fps at 9000 psi. with an 85 grain plain base cast bullet.

If it is consistent, (i.e. low Std.Dev.) that could be a great starting point. 

My experience with 4227 in .35 Remington years ago was that 4227 liked more pressure.  At that low a load, you might want to watch for squibs.  If you do get squibs, you'll have to go to a faster powder.   (I'm still advocating for 4.0 grains of Unique.)
« Last Edit: Mar 3rd, 2011 at 11:08pm by uscra112 »  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #17 - Mar 4th, 2011 at 1:03pm
Print Post  
Hello, again, everyone.  uscra112..Thank you for quick-load info..I am very green at this computer stuff..don't even have one in home..yet.  I agree..that .25-25 is a LONG case & small charge might get lost in there.  I have an old can of Hercules Unique & can try.  The other day, I had a nice conversation with Paul Shuttleworth, he said the Ballard cast actions were probably closer to a cast-steel..At any rate, in his opinion, they are stronger than the Stevens 44.  This I did not know..I have seen some fairly stiff loads of 4227 in a .32-40 Mod.44, being used at our local schuetzen matches.  He suggested forgetting black in that small case and starting with the 4227.   I have tried XMP 5744 in the Hornet..after first shot..I couldn't chamber round..full of unburned powder..even heaver loads didn't help much & accuracy wasn't there.  Looks like the market is open for a bulky low-pressure smokeless for these old ones.  Thanks again for all your help.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7265
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #18 - Mar 4th, 2011 at 4:11pm
Print Post  
Hmmmmm, bulking, low pressure powder, uncoated easy to ignite, still in production. sounds like 4759, don't it.

Seriously though. It does leave unburnt powder if the pressure is to low and don't forget it's not easy to measure but, that's was why ( Grin) they invented the B&M measure, isn't it?

I haven't tried it in my 25/20ss, I really should though. I only tried three powders working up my 25/20ss loads and of the three Unique and B'dot worked best. Both in the 5 gr range.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #19 - Mar 4th, 2011 at 6:51pm
Print Post  
Well, the bulky criterion leads right to Trail Boss, no doubt about it.  For whatever faults it may have, fluffy it is. . . . 

But if you have Unique on hand, load 4.0 to 5.0 grains and see what it'll do for you.    

Was just reading in a 1940s magazine that 4759 was introduced to replace the old duPont #80, which was very nearly a "bulk smokeless".   Can one still get 4759?      

Phil
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7265
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #20 - Mar 4th, 2011 at 7:16pm
Print Post  
Yes, Most reloading supplys should have it. It's easy to find on the West coast. It now comes in the big round Hodgdon black plastic bottles. I have a lot of old stock and can't say if it burns the same but, I think it does. Maybe someone else can chime in on that.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: .25-25 Stevens...Smokeless?
Reply #21 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 1:45pm
Print Post  
Hello, everyone, and thanks for many helpful reply's.  I do have an oldr can of 4759, I see on the burn charts, it is 1 notch above 4227..so might just help in the un-burned powder area.  I will let you know.   One other question..Has anyone used the camming action of the Ballard with a "plugged" case as a breech-seater?  I have done this on the Stevens 44 1/2, with good results.  If using a soft tapered bullet, is this harmful to action?..(increased wear?)  Thank you.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint