Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic The real reason converting a Favorite to CF... (Read 4786 times)
Paul_Skvorc
Ex Member


The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Jan 11th, 2009 at 10:12pm
Print Post  
may not work.

At another location in this forum I started a thread with an inquiry about converting a Stevens .32 Long RF to some CF version so I could find/make my own ammo and actually shoot the thing. I had just purchased the rifle, but had yet to receive it. Furthermore, I had never owned or shot a Favorite. My question asked specifically about "max chamber pressure", and the answers were in that context.

Lotsa folks - one exception - stated unequivocally that this conversion was a "bad idea". All -  except the one - used "too much pressure" as the reason.

However, when I got my hands on the rifle, it was patently obvious to me that the rifle's receiver and barrel were MORE than adequate to handle ANY pressures I was interested in subjecting the rifle to once converted. The cartridge I was interested in to start with was the .25-20 SS. I was completely happy keeping the chamber pressures down to 20,000 PSI or less. 20,000 PSI being a full 30% lower than the 26,000 PSI of High Velocity .22 RF cartridges which the Favorite shoots without complaint - at least as far as some said.

Since taking receipt of the rifle, I have had a chance to take it apart and study it and talk with an old friend that has "done it". We get along in large part because neither of us take "because" as a reason for not doing something, so when Paul, (yes his name is Paul too Wink), says it's a "bad idea", I listen. He pointed out exactly why this conversion would very  likely be ill-fated. While I remain absolutley convinced that the barrel and receiver can "handle the load", and much more in fact, I am equally convinced that the ACTION cannot.

As I held the action pieces in my hands, Paul explained that the issue wasn't "strength" per se, it was "design". The linkage is simply not designed to take much "bolt thrust" without "giving". The action isn't harmed by this. However, "flexing" exposes the head of the cartridge. With a thin-walled case - like a balloon-cased .22 RF - the head may separate or leak gasses. Sad

By this time, I had already designed a very efficient cartridge that I could get a 125-grain bullet doing 1900 f/s at the muzzle and keep the chamber pressure right at 20,000 PSI. Nonetheless, once Paul explained the real problem, I was concerned that even this cartridge would be "too much" for the Favorite. But it wasn't necessary to guess about it as calculating the critical value was simple. To put it in a phrase, the issue is "linkage" but the ruler is "bolt thrust". The linkage design of the Favorite is not geometrically optimized, and is simply too 'loose', to allow use of modern centerfire cartridges. That's NOT criticism, just observation. As far as I can tell the Favorite does just fine doing what it was designed for.

I called the new cartridge the ".32 Honest". Here are the numbers:

For the 32 Honest:
20,000 PSI chamber pressure,
0.440" head diameter.
Head area = 0.152 square inches.
Bolt thrust = 0.152 * 20,000 = 3041 pounds. (Head area * chamber pressure).

For the .22 RF:
26,000 PSI chamber pressure,
0.270" head diameter.
Head area = 0.018 square inches.
Bolt Thrust = 0.018 * 26,000 = 1488 pounds.

The "Honest" has essentially twice the bolt thrust of a High Velocity .22 RF. (WRT "bolt thrust" in the absolute, I'm not going to get into how "sticky" the chamber walls are, or whether the case is "tapered" or "bottle-necked". For an exercise in which we're looking for a generalized comparison, considering individual variability between components is inappropriate.) 

Based on these numbers, it doesn't look good for the CF cartridge. It appears, that since metal strength is really not the issue with the Favorite action, the "ceiling" which any "new" potential cartridge must fall below is something like 1500 pounds of "bolt thrust". Even that - 1500 pounds of bolt thrust - is apparently the absolute max figure, as lotsa folks have complained that the Favorite can't really handle a High Velocity .22 RF without flexing.

So...

Thanks to those that took the time to read and comment on my other posts. Truly. I've learned a great deal so far.

Maybe this post will provide some quantitative support for any future queries about the "reasonableness" of converting a Steven Favorite chambered for a rim-fire cartridge to center-fire. Or... AS I'm relatively new here, maybe this has already been pointed out but didn't make it into the other thread because it is "common knowledge". Anyway, now it's my "common knowledge" too.

Thanks,
Paul
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4141
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #1 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 7:59am
Print Post  
Paul,

     First, thanks for the well thought out and clearly expressed thoughts above.  If nothing else, they will make some us think about our own preconceived or just long-held notions and evaluate them for what they are (and aren't.)  This and the previous post/thread may help others starting out on similar projects as well.

     In the meanwhile, the cartridge you propose sounds like a pretty neat little beast.  I have a soft spot in my heart (weak spot in my brain?) for the little "pistol class" .32s and am going to spend a goodly amount of time examining your idea.  It seems to me that you were in the right pew but the wrong church, to mangle a good old "Southern-ism."  I like the cartridge for the next receiver strength level up... even a smooth side low-wall or something of that ilk seems like it would be an appropriate platform for your cartridge.  If you do decide to pursue the project further, I for one would welcome reports of your progress.

Regards,
Charlie the Frog
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DoubleD
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 766
Location: Edmond
Joined: Feb 14th, 2006
Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #2 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 9:53am
Print Post  
There is one other factor that I was taught a long time ago to consider when deciding whether to convert or build a rifle.  Never build a rifle for how you will shoot it, always build it for how the next guy will shoot it.
  

Douglas, Ret.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JCHannum
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 435
Location: Toledo
Joined: Aug 8th, 2007
Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #3 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 11:18am
Print Post  
I also have recently become intrigued with .32 pistol cartridges, primarily because of the .327 magnum. It would seem to replicate your intended velocity, but at about double the pressure.

I recently finished grafting a British Enfield barrel on a single shot shotgun frame with this end in mind. It makes an inexpensive platform, and is plenty stout. Numrich has the demilled 303 barrels at $15.30. Green Mountain has steel 32-20 blanks at a very economical price if you would prefer that route.
  

Jim H.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul_Skvorc
Ex Member


Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #4 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 2:03pm
Print Post  
Thanks fellas.

The demilled .303 barrels is interesting, and opens the door for me to relate what my line of thinking was as I was 'scheming' about the favorite.

First, the fact that ".32 caliber" rarely actually means .32 caliber kinda annoys me. (But then so do a number of other 'trivial' things too.) Nonetheless, as I was looking at potential bullets, I of course found a much better selection of .323" bullets than .312" or .313". That in turn got me to thinking about .323 barrels, and I quickly realized that I have many Mauser 98 take-off barrels. I can't bring myself to throw them away, but I haven't found many good uses for them either. That is "til now. A Turk '38 starts out at 29", and has plenty of meat to end up with a 24" half-round/half-octagonal Favorite barrel. Of course, now, that's not a viable idea for chambering in a CF cartridge, but...

This whole issue of "linkage geometry" has my 'gears turning' (No pun intended.) I'm going to spend some time looking at the Favorite action, and seeing if I can come up with a design that will allow a nice modest-pressured cartridge to be used in a "Favorite-esque" action. I have found a source of reasonably priced 4140 bar stock, and have been itchin' to make a single-shot receiver. The Favorite seems, at least at this first blush, a good place to start. I'm also considering a rolling block, but I don't have one of those in my hand... yet. Smiley

Thanks again,
Paul
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
stevens52
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 233
Location: Fairview,NC
Joined: Jun 6th, 2004
Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #5 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 5:21pm
Print Post  
You might look at the "44" it's basically a "big favorite". Kind of "favoritesque". Again, quite available in 25 RF. With the same firing pin modifications as proposed to the favorite it can be made into a CF quite nicely and can handle larger dimensioned cartridges. Or better yet, 25 Stevens CF made from Hornet brass.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
notlwonk
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 165
Location: Coventry CT
Joined: Dec 18th, 2006
Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #6 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 6:59pm
Print Post  
For what its worth, when figuring total bolt thrust the proper way to calculate it is by using the largest 'inside the case' diameter. This is what the internal pressure 'pushes' against.

Bolt thrust for a .312 dia. @ 20000 PSI# is 1529 pounds.*
Bolt thrust for .22 rf @ 26000 PSI is 1276 pounds. **
 * Assuming a straight case.
 ** Not sure of the inside dia. of the rim cavity, I used .250
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul_Skvorc
Ex Member


Re: The real reason converting a Favorite to CF...
Reply #7 - Jan 12th, 2009 at 7:47pm
Print Post  
Quote:
the proper way


I'm "with ya", but... it isn't quite that simple. If we are talking about what "force" is going to be transferred from the burning powder to the PIN holding the breechblock, (which in this case we are), then you are correct that the diameter of the HEAD, (but not the inside of the head), not the RIM is the figure we are after. If on the other hand, we are interested in what the bolt FACE can "take", then the rim most certanly matters - a great deal. For example: If I poke your arm with a force of 10 newtons with my finger it's one thing. If I poke your arm with a needle with a force of 10 newtons, I assume you'll be a bit more upset with me.

So, you are correct that for the example I gave above regarding the .32 Honest and the .22 RF, the ratio would be smaller that 2:1. Maybe even small enough to allow the Honest case to be considered.

Thanks,
Paul
« Last Edit: Jan 12th, 2009 at 7:53pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint