(Moderator Group: Moderator)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Puff-Lon (Read 4764 times)
Joe_S
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1010
Joined: Jun 29th, 2004
Puff-Lon
Apr 4th, 2005 at 8:59pm
Print Post  
  I just saw and ad for Puff-Lon, and was considering  trying it for 45-70 loads with 4759 and 5744. Has anyone had any experience with it? Thanks, Joe S
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #1 - Apr 5th, 2005 at 8:59am
Print Post  
Joe
I have never esed Puff-lon but my tests with 5744 indicated that I got smaller shot to shot diveations when the powder was not restricted in any way. I shot it with a wad on the powder, With a wad cream of wheat and a top wad and just a wad at the mouth of the case to stop powder spill. All loads were shot on the same day. To my suprise the lowest diveations over the chronograph were when there was a wad on the mouth of the case and the powder was loose.
40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joe_S
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1010
Joined: Jun 29th, 2004
Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #2 - Apr 5th, 2005 at 8:07pm
Print Post  
Very Interesting! So far, my experiments show a slight improvement with a 1/4 sheet of toilet paper wad, but the improvement was not dramatic.  Havent tried cream of wheat but I just bought some for my cap and ball revolver so I might as well try it.  The toilet paper is time consuming, so if I can find something that is more convenient to work with and results in better groups, I'd like to try it. The proof is on the target, of course, Thanks! Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bob_Allen
Ex Member


Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #3 - Apr 5th, 2005 at 9:57pm
Print Post  
  This might sound dumb but when I was a kid the old geezer who got me started used wads cut from white faced hornets nests he gathered in the fall.I have never done this.Has anyone else ever seen this?
                                   Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joe_S
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1010
Joined: Jun 29th, 2004
Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #4 - Apr 5th, 2005 at 10:03pm
Print Post  
No offense Bob, but wild hornets couldnt get me to try that one!  Seriously, I have heard of it, but there's got to be an easier way! Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
EdStutz
Ex Member


Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #5 - Apr 7th, 2005 at 8:40am
Print Post  
Excuse my ignorance but what is Puff-Lon ?

Ed
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rwjshooter
Ex Member


Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #6 - Apr 7th, 2005 at 12:00pm
Print Post  
Hi ED

if you go to (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links); that should explain it better than I could.

rwjshooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
swifty
Ex Member


Re: Puff-Lon
Reply #7 - May 2nd, 2005 at 10:35am
Print Post  
I have actually used Puff-Lon. It is a prepartion of beads
I could not tell a lot of difference in using it but I did not compare groups.  How to use.. After charging with powder
you fill the case up t the rim with Puff-Lon then compress the additive as you seat the bullet. It supposedly give better groups and a cleaner barrel. On the other hand, using 4759 or 5744 both are not position sensitive and supposedly do not require fillers. Puff-Lon is not inexpensive, it does require an extra step in loading process ,and it does case a bit of a flim of the beads on you gun after shooting.I may buy some more later to use with 4198. I have had problems with 4198 causing more carbon residue. Now I am using black powder.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ASSRA Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge

Page completed in 1.2872 seconds.