Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) entry level . . . again (Read 40453 times)
gunny
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #15 - Nov 30th, 2004 at 1:52pm
Print Post  
Joe,

Good to see a post with your name on it. You are corrct we are old adversaries, hope that never changes. Never ever wanted anyopne to agree with all I have to say, disagreements when honest and heartfelt are a good thing.

The quality of the CPA has always bothered me since I waited a whole year to get that raschel. But since we are talking quality here some, and this thread was about that first SS rifle. And I am sure that some folks here think I am picking on there brand of rifle, I'll go a little further with this quality thing. Folks that know me and shoot with me know for a fact that I am a big fan of Highwalls, and I felt for a long time that the "BEST" reproduction Highwall was the Meacham. I have owned the number one Meacham ever built as a Complete Rifle thaT WAS SERIAL # 52 ALL Meachams before that one where actions only. I know own five Meachams, and shoot a Meacham as my match rifle. Meachams are not a cheap rifle to purchase, as a matter of fact the average Meacham with DST and most thing standared that is no fancy wood etc. is going to set you back over $4,000 and they can run much higher. Meacham is one of the more costly custom rifles available to us. So if money was the way to judge quality you would think that a Meacham would have no problems at all. Well it just didn't work out that way. While you will not find 40 or 60 grit scratches on the reciever, and the extractor slots are cut as they should be, all of the five Meachams I own and maybe 50 or so others I have looked at all have the same problem. That is the rear tang is off by .040. Now the reader of this will say so what? How much difference could .040 make? Well folks it makes a lot of difference. When you pay over $4,000.00 for a custom rifle it should be right that is all. That .040 off on that rear tang equates to 3 MIN of left windage, and it makes it very difficult to find a true zero for the windage. It can be adjusted for alright, but it should not have been there in the first place. Steve Meacham knows about this flaw in his jig and for years refused to do any thing about it. So there is another little tale about quality in a custom built rifle, this time it is the rifles I choose to own, maybe that means I got suckered too.

Gunny
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JDSteele
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #16 - Nov 30th, 2004 at 4:31pm
Print Post  
Gunny, I guess that just goes to show that they all have their warts. I personally have never liked the Meacham wall because of their so-called 'safety' firing pin design, but didn't know about the tang problem. It's absolutely INEXCUSABLE in a $4000 rifle, for that price you can get a rifle built by a real custom (Guild) gunsmith to your specs within reason of course.

Very interesting, especially considering that Meacham made such a big deal out of their claim that their parts supposedly were made to such exacting tolerances that they would interchange perfectly with the factory stuff. Horsefeathers, obviously.

And it looks even worse that Steve wouldn't voluntarily correct the problem when discovered & brought to his attention. But I guess the almighty dollar was more important, too bad.
Cheers, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shep_Madera
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #17 - Dec 2nd, 2004 at 10:39am
Print Post  
Terrific insight and information! Thanks to all for the spirited input.

Looks like the .38-55 might be the caliber of choice right now and at this point, a Uberti Low Wall or the H & R Buffalo Rifle as a beginner's platform.

Shep
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #18 - Dec 2nd, 2004 at 3:55pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Terrific insight and information! Thanks to all for the spirited input.

Looks like the .38-55 might be the caliber of choice right now and at this point, a Uberti Low Wall or the H & R Buffalo Rifle as a beginner's platform.

Shep

Well - there are Martini's of course!  Grin
SOrry JD, coulldn't stop bringing up the subject - I just about shoot everything with Martini's.  Participated in this year's Trafalgar meeting in Bisley shooting nothing but Martini's .  Problem is - nobody's making new ones, it strictly is a custom proposition.  Posiitive points are the stout action and fast locktime, and the basic price for an action is also quite reasonable.  On the other side, cleaning from the breech is very hard, and the rifle has no tangs - but that throughbolt is a very secure buttstock fastening...  Seriously looking at rechambering one of my 45-70's to 500/450#2 musket for some LR shooting...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
stevens52
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 222
Location: Fairview,NC
Joined: Jun 6th, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #19 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 6:03pm
Print Post  
I think you've sorted through this pretty well. It seems your basic (as stated) interest is CAS. If it is, you're thinking reasonably. If you just want to have fun, keep the price reasonable and smell out bpcr or maybe schuetzen you have a good idea. On the other hand, if you want to be a competitive,serious, single-shot shooter you should go with CPA, Meacham, Ballard Rifle or something along those lines. The Uberti can't keep pace with them.One primary consideration is cost. You need to decide whether you want to invest 1,500 or 2500 or 4000. Basically those are the price categories............It's a lot to think about. Choose wisely....The low end guns are hard to get rid of if you want out but the better rifles cost more initially............It really is that simple. You should think hard about how serious you think you are. If you buy a good rifle you won't have trouble on the far end should you decide to sell out, heirs won't have trouble either. Cheaper stuff and and converted stuff is more difficult both in shootability and buying/selling. My 2 cents worth for free.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Ex Member
*****


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #20 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 9:21pm
Print Post  
Just thought I'd give one other option, that might save a little money, and still provide a decent alternative, and good shooter.
You might consider looking for a good original used gun or action. Original Rolling Block smokeless actions, or beater rifles can make a good BPCR rifle, although not the best choice for schuetzen. Other guns like a Winchester Hi Wall action, or Ballard forged action, would make a decent all around gun, and when built up with a reasonably priced Green Mountain barrel, they would be competitive too. 
Depepnding on what you pay for a beater gun, or action, you could get in pretty cheap. I found an old Ballard #4 complete gun for $200, and when completed, I have less than $1,000 in it. I also found a rebarreled Hepburn action, and when I finished it, I have about $950 in it.
Just some other choices, if you're not in too big a hurry.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4029
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #21 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 9:44pm
Print Post  
I am almost on the same wavelength as marlinguy on this one.  It IS possible to build up a rifle on an original action that has fallen onto hard times as long as three conditions are satisfied;

1) It must be an action that was originally suited to the kind of shooting you want to do...the Winchester 'walls are my favorites with Ballard right behind, but I would not turn down a suitable Rem Hepburn, Sharps Borchardt, or Stevens 44 1/2 then here's the important part, it must be in good shape when you get it or repair becomes a prohibitive up-front cost.

2) You must have the ability to rebarrel it or have access to someone who does, and if you are depending on someone else this will add time and expense to the project.

3) And perhaps this should have been #1, you will have to devote a fair amount of time to finding the action and going through the building process BEFORE you even get your first shot off.

For the reasons above, I am thinking that building such a gun would be better for your SECOND rifle, and I will go out on a limb and say you would be better off to buy something new and fairly  inexpensive to begin with, OR buy a used rifle from someone who is moving up or moving on, and shoot that rifle until you develop a feel for what it is you really like and what features you want to use on the "permanent" gun.  This latter method will get you shooting about immediately and will give you the opportunity to find out just what is really going on and what you want to do with the game.  I am thinking long and hard about the newly released Cimarron in .38-55 w/DSTs if it will truly be available.  I'd rather go with a .32-40, but you can't have it all, especially at that price.
   
Well, that's my story and I'm sticking to it...YMMV!   Roll Eyes

the Green Frog
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JDSteele
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #22 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 10:32pm
Print Post  
What Froggie said. All my rifles are rebuilt oldies.
ttfn, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
stevens52
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 222
Location: Fairview,NC
Joined: Jun 6th, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #23 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 11:11pm
Print Post  
Let's be honest and practical....Rebuilt oldies are great  but, (and you know this is true) it's rare for a newbie to find a decent action. Guys like us have the radar up and the feelers out all the time. Seldom does one get by that's decent. It's a small circle. If you can't do the work yourself or know someone who will help you out greatly you wind up with a lot of money tied up in something that may or may not be suitable. A lot of 'smiths won't work on 'em. I just worked on a Ruger for a friend, a lot of money tied up, big name 'smith, wouldn't shoot worth a flip. It'll shoot now but he couldn't get back half what he's got in it. Ten years ago most of us wouldn't have looked twice at a roller unless it was perfect. Now there a huge black hole where all the rollers have gone  and the other stuff too. Parts are rare so we snatch em up whether we need 'em or not. HONESTLY, what's a new guy gonna do in a couple of years if he doesn't have a couple grand to spend?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Corky
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 119
Location: Land O Lakes, FL
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #24 - Dec 3rd, 2004 at 11:44pm
Print Post  
Browning's Traditional Hunter in 38-55 was the first rifle of mine I used in schuetzen.  They have a tang and through bolt but can be difficult to find.  I paid a grand for mine but am unaware of the current prices.   

Just thought I woudl offer another avenue to search.  The Brownings in my opinion, would be a better choice than a Uberti/Cimmaron over the long haul.

But if you are serious, go with one of the new version Highwalls, CPA's or Ballard.  I have seen CPA unfinished schetzen models for as little as $1200 (most being from $1500 to $2000.  Find some one selling a used rifle that needs the money or wants a new toy.  The time spent searching will pay dividends in the end.  Don't be in so big a hurry to play that you buy a second or third choice and have to lose money to trade up later anyway.

Corky
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hst
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 569
Joined: Jun 3rd, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #25 - Dec 4th, 2004 at 3:26pm
Print Post  
Mr. Corky:

How is every little thing? Please give our best to Miss Day.

Your idea of a a Browning/Winchester action as a basis for a rifle is well worth considering. It seems that I have seen these rifles new for less than $800 w/o sights. 

While not  "original" it does look traditional and is a very good action. Shucks, you could throw away the stock and barrel and still have a better action than you could by most anywhere for $800. It certainly is stong and safe with any reasonable load in most any chambering. The trigger can be made to be quite good and the stock, while not ideal, would be suitable for bench shooting. If one wanted and offhand rifle the stock could be modified to fit and used as a pattern for a new stock.

This is an idea that might bear looking into...

Glenn




  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Corky
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 119
Location: Land O Lakes, FL
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #26 - Dec 5th, 2004 at 12:25am
Print Post  
HST 

The stock on the Traditional Hunter can be improved upon.  The BPCR stock fits, with some minor modification.  The tang for the TH is about 3/8" shorter than the BPCR.  I bought a piece of black micarta to fill the gap.

The curved butt plate on the TH is not perfect for our game but it could be cut square.  I was thinking of the 38-55, but rebarreling would give you unlimited choices and other calibers might be slightly less $.   

Corky
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
singelshotman
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #27 - Dec 5th, 2004 at 1:30pm
Print Post  
Now this is a bit off topic-but for $4,000 you could buy a china lathe and milling machine and do all your work yourself and never need a gunsmith again. My dad was a machinest and  i never had any formal training and i'm almost as good as he was( my dad worked for the navy NARF for 30 years).You can buy a good set of castings from Rodney Storie for $200 and finish them yourself. I think training is bad for a machinest anywhay-i've done stuff my father wouldn't do because he was trained to do things a certain way only-there is more than one way to skin a cat. I've chambered three barrels without a large lathe and all of them came out fine-better than some commerical i've seen-because i cleaned out the chips and wasn't in a hurry.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
445supermag
Ex Member
*



Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #28 - Dec 9th, 2004 at 6:32am
Print Post  
Well i have been reading about the CPA,s. I found it was only 1-3/4 hours from my house. I called and got directions and made the trip last monday. They had a 40/70 sillewet rifle in stock on there web site that i was interested in. The web site said it was 1625 with unfinished stocks.
    When i got there gail showed me the rifle ,918 that was listed.. Boy i got to say it was pretty. I looked for the flaws that had been mention and could not find them. The wood on this rifle was more than fancy. I had payed c-sharps 75$ upgrade that not even close to this one. I asked about the engraved one and how much. Gail got a recever that had the copy of standerd stevens engraving and it had a satian silver plate. I sure was nice not a scratch on the recever. She also showed me a few mor ingraved ones ,some with gold inlay. One was fron ken hurst. I asked gail about the wear and tarnish of the silver finish. Gail went an got an origenol 44-1/2 in silver finish boy it still looked good. Yes there were sum shiner spots from wear but it had that nice old look that it should have.
  Rifle 918 had the ball and sper lever that i did not like  I asked if i could get the loop lever. No proplem. I like that silver engraved recever, how much 350$ extra. She even put the wood stock and the barrel on the silver recever so i could see what that combination would look like.
   Now you ask did i get #918 yes i did.  It is as fine a rifle as the browing bpcr,c-sharps and pedersolie,s that i have handled or own. The wood i woul say is better. The lever is not sloppe. The barrel has no sights ,  a mat barrel finish but the screws are bright blue. If you can do the finish work on the wood, that is sanding not shapeing or fitting it,s the way to go if money is tight. Yes the uberties and pedersolie are cheeper but there wood is not as nice. O ya i staied with the color cased recever. But i keep thinking of a vermit rifle weth that silver ingraved recever. with a 219 don cal. barrel with bright blue and maybe the s lever. I can also get evtra barrels in maybe 22 hornet , or 38/55...or......
  The best cal for first gun, cal 38/55 win/marlin/ ballerd. It can be used for hunting, sillewets and that shootzen game. With a gm barrel in 1/14 twist you got all the bases covered.I,ve been shooting a hepburn in 38/55 most of all last year and like it the best over the 40/65,45/70 and the 50/90. Why did i get the 40/70 just did not have one in that cal. E/mail or call and see what they have in stock I did handle a buTfull 22cal wermit rifle with fiddleback maple with a golden honey finish and dark checkering that was hard to put down. If you ever get around that way stop by and take a look. It will well be worth the trip.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunny
Ex Member


Re: entry level . . . again
Reply #29 - Dec 10th, 2004 at 1:36am
Print Post  
Stevens 52,
I am going to have to disagree a little with you on a couple of your comments. You state that the "Cheaper" rifles like the Uberti will not "Keep Pace" wityh the higher end riflles. I don't believe this is a reasonable assumption, it is an assumption though. I personally am a Silhouette Shooter so I am only going to speak to that venue, however i do feel that target shooting is pretty much target shooting no matter the venue. but since my experiance lies with Silhouette I will only speak to that. It has always been my experiance that it is the shooter and not the rifle that really makes the difference. Give any of the top ten "BEST" Silhouette Shooters in the country all Pedersoli's and Uberti's, give them the time do do a little load work up and get some trigger time on these "Low end Guns" as you put it. Give all the rest of the Silhouette Shooters in the country the best CPA's (if there is such a thing as a best CPA), Meachams, Ballards etc. And guess what? Those same ten dedicated and practiced best Silhouette Shooters are still goimng to be the 10 best or damn close. It is now, as it has always been ---The Nut Behind The Butt. The shooter makes the rifle not the other way around.

Gunny
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint