Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle (Read 304 times)
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2179
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Aug 12th, 2026 at 9:06pm
Print Post  
It’s been almost three years since I had Tom Klinger install a shorter (20”) 1:16 twist Shilen ratchet barrel with a match chamber on my Stevens .22.  I continue to get comments about muzzle noise & velocities & thought I’d share my thought process prior to having Tom rebarrel the rifle.  At the time I did a good bit of research on .22-barrel lengths.  My main goal was achieving a better balance when shooting offhand chickens.  Some prefer a heavy-barreled rifle indicating it doesn’t move around as much.  Due to old age & being in less-than-ideal physical shape, a lighter weight rifle is easier for me to control.  And, although I still shoot zero chickens now & then, my average chicken scores have improved.  Also, since I use a scope, barrel length is not an issue.
 
During the research I ran across the results of an experiment on barrel length vs. velocity.  Here's the results of shortening a Ruger 77/22 barrel in 2" increments: 28" 1095fps, 26" 1107, 24" 1119, 22" 1129, 20" 1138, 18" 1149, 16" 1157, 14" 1149 fps.  So, the average in the Ruger is approximately 5fps/inch.  And, as reported in other articles, .22LR barrels less than 16” or shorter will lose velocities.
 
Due to a good bit of experimenting out to 200yds. with several brands of ammo, I’ve concluded my rifle likes Eley 10X or Match (black box) rated velocities in the 1080fps range.  But that’s not the actual muzzle velocity of the rifle.  More on this later.  If you’ve wondered how Eley determines the lot velocity, following is the method: Once a lot is manufactured, four different test guns are used to test the lot in a 50-meter tunnel.  The rifles are all different ages (based on round fired) with different barrel lengths and chamber specs.  If all four guns shoot a lot well, the lot is labeled 10X.  If it shoots well in some of the guns and not others, it's labeled Match.  If it does not shoot that well in any of the guns, it's labeled Eley Team.
 
I mentioned above that my rifle likes Eley Match with a rated velocity in the 1080fps range.  If you wondered what the actual velocity was out of my rifle.  Using Eley Match rated at 1084fps, the muzzle velocity averaged 1148fps, about a 6% increase.

Continued on next post.
Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2179
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #1 - Aug 12th, 2026 at 9:06pm
Print Post  
BTW, knowing what I know now, if I were to replace the barrel, I'd probably go with a 14-twist to minimize the possibility of stability issues at 200 meters.  To increase stability (assuming it's an issue), one must increase the bullet spin-rate.  The faster the spin, the more stable the bullet remains in its trajectory.  There are two methods, increase the velocity or use a faster-twist barrel, the faster-twist barrel being the most effective.
 
Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tim_s
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 834
Location: 13066
Joined: Oct 11th, 2006
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #2 - Aug 12th, 2026 at 9:43pm
Print Post  
FWIW @ 20” you’ve eliminated a lot of the benefit of the Shilen which is taper lapped and by design is made to end up 24”-26”,
Your referenced study is all about velocity/burn rates, not top accuracy.
Lastly there is zero relationship driven by speed in a match barrel…..lit’s all about individual lots.
All of this established fact in the performance driven RFBR world where plenty of ratchets live.

Lastly ELEY can be quite good but past 100 the flat nose hurts….R50, SK, Lapua will outperform, especially Lapua.
  

“ I don’t have to be faster than the bear, I just have to be faster than you”
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joelpend
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 88
Location: Central North Carolina
Joined: Dec 29th, 2015
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #3 - yesterday at 10:38am
Print Post  
Eley has always been considerably faster for me than the box states. Lapua usually very close to box number. Wayne, Your actual velocity is in the transonic region and you may be going supersonic on some rounds thus the noise is considerably louder. Of course the speed of sound changes with temperature. If it were me I would try to find slower lots that work. I usually find something in the 1050-1060 fps (Eley box number) that works in my rifles. The transonic region is not a good place to be for accuracy.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2179
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #4 - yesterday at 11:39am
Print Post  
joelpend wrote yesterday at 10:38am:
Eley has always been considerably faster for me than the box states. Lapua usually very close to box number. Wayne, Your actual velocity is in the transonic region and you may be going supersonic on some rounds thus the noise is considerably louder. Of course the speed of sound changes with temperature. If it were me I would try to find slower lots that work. I usually find something in the 1050-1060 fps (Eley box number) that works in my rifles. The transonic region is not a good place to be for accuracy.


joelpend,

I share your concern & had done some research on the subject.  The range I shoot at is approximately 203ft. above sea level.  At that elevation, ignoring temperature, the transonic range is roughly 900 to 1340fps; the muzzle velocity range of just about all the match-grade ammo.

BTW, I've tried several brands of ammo with rated velocities of 1070 to 1120fps (actual velocities of 1039 to 1148fps).  In all cases the rifle's precision at 200yds is best at the higher velocities.  The absolute best precision was with RWS100 at a measured velocity of 1141fps, but I'm not willing to spend around $40/box for RWS100 assuming it's available.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tim_s
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 834
Location: 13066
Joined: Oct 11th, 2006
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #5 - yesterday at 12:56pm
Print Post  
[quote author=744F4D6B4C494E474552200 link=1786583171/3#3 date=1786586841]I’ve installed many ratchet barrels and none of them were “taper lapped”
Pin gauged every one before installation.
I’ve also got the worst performance with Lapua. Terrible SD and ES. out of the ratchet barrels.
Every barrel will definitely let you know what it likes

If it’s been the last couple years their quality has fallen off big time, current guys can’t lap, don’t ship ratchets to speak of.
Historically they’ve all been taper lapped about .0002”.
Established fact where many live in the RFBR world, every one I’ve owned has been tapered..
Have doubts, call Jerry Stiller who’s probably fit 100


« Last Edit: yesterday at 1:01pm by tim_s »  

“ I don’t have to be faster than the bear, I just have to be faster than you”
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TomKlinger
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 284
Location: Central Florida
Joined: Feb 17th, 2019
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #6 - yesterday at 1:09pm
Print Post  
I could be wrong but I slug each end and measure. Couldn’t tell any difference. I know that’s not the best method. Next time I’m where I used to work, I will take my rifle in and check it in the cal. lab with the .0002 pin gauges. My pin gauge set only goes .0005.


Tom Klinger
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joelpend
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 88
Location: Central North Carolina
Joined: Dec 29th, 2015
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #7 - yesterday at 2:32pm
Print Post  
Wayne,
I hear you on the price of the R100. John Whidden recently sent out a memo from their test facility of a really tiny group shot with the R100 in a full blown benchrest rifle. I was thinking ya, paying that for ammo should come with a guarantee. Quite a few folks here are liking the SK Long Range Match and secondly the SK Rifle Match. I have a new CPA with a tight groove Lilja (have not shot it yet as I have the 32-40 barrel on it now) I am hoping one of the SK mentioned will work or I have quite a bit of Eley Black Box and Blue Box that work well in my CZ rifles. When we pay more to shoot our rimfires than it cost us to shoot our centerfires it kindly takes some fun out of it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tim_s
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 834
Location: 13066
Joined: Oct 11th, 2006
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #8 - yesterday at 3:10pm
Print Post  
TomKlinger wrote yesterday at 1:09pm:
I could be wrong but I slug each end and measure. Couldn’t tell any difference. I know that’s not the best method. Next time I’m where I used to work, I will take my rifle in and check it in the cal. lab with the .0002 pin gauges. My pin gauge set only goes .0005.

There’s your answer wrong pins…wrong result.
As stated, also, direct from Shilen, historically taper lapped about .0002+- just like every other RF match blank from, Hart, Lilja, Muller, BM, etc…… owned/ shot, slugged them all.


Tom Klinger

  

“ I don’t have to be faster than the bear, I just have to be faster than you”
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2149
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Update on my Stevens 44 .22LR BPCRA rifle
Reply #9 - yesterday at 5:43pm
Print Post  
tim_s wrote yesterday at 3:10pm:
TomKlinger wrote yesterday at 1:09pm:
I could be wrong but I slug each end and measure. Couldn’t tell any difference. I know that’s not the best method. Next time I’m where I used to work, I will take my rifle in and check it in the cal. lab with the .0002 pin gauges. My pin gauge set only goes .0005.

There’s your answer wrong pins…wrong result.
As stated, also, direct from Shilen, historically taper lapped about .0002+- just like every other RF match blank from, Hart, Lilja, Muller, BM, etc…… owned/ shot, slugged them all.


Tom Klinger



Tim, 
I’m not a machinist so pardon what may be a dumb question.  You note the taper spec. at .0002+-.   

Does this mean that the taper can be .0000 to .0004 and still be in spec.?
Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint