Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Scope Magnification (Read 463 times)
Flatlander
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 719
Location: Warm Arizona
Joined: Apr 24th, 2004
Scope Magnification
Aug 6th, 2026 at 3:41pm
Print Post  
I'm in process of dedication scopes on rifles so I don't have to swap them around. My bench rest ,CPA in 32-40 only has a 12x scope left on it. Is that enough for old eyes at 200 yards or do I need another scope? I could always try it out and see but that means I have to fire up the lead pot and cast up some bullets to load. Thanks.

Flatlander
  

NRA Life
ASSRA Member 3197
Charcoal Burner
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RDBallard
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 125
Location: Kansas
Joined: Apr 22nd, 2020
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #1 - Aug 6th, 2026 at 4:00pm
Print Post  
Personally I prefer a 20X for my old eyes but I got lucky years ago and found a Unertl 1 1/2" 24X that I use. I don't think I'd ever be happy with a 12X at 200
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7718
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #2 - Aug 6th, 2026 at 4:05pm
Print Post  
12x can work at 200 but, you might need a spotting scope to find a impact sometimes.

I've done very well with a 15x at 200 and didn't have a issue with returning to my exact POA.

POA is the biggest issue with any scope. If your eye centers well even a 8x will get you good grouping and scores.

That said, a 20x is easier, overall.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2667
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #3 - Aug 6th, 2026 at 4:46pm
Print Post  
You can shoot nice groups with lower power scopes, but I find that when I use a 20x I can do a much better job of holding off for the wind because I can see the scoring rings properly.

Chris.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3880
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #4 - Aug 6th, 2026 at 6:33pm
Print Post  
I second (or is it third, maybe fourth) the 20X suggestion.  I prefer 10 to 15x for offhand or 100 yd use.

Jack
  

People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Flatlander
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 719
Location: Warm Arizona
Joined: Apr 24th, 2004
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #5 - Aug 6th, 2026 at 6:41pm
Print Post  
Due to popular wisdom iit looks like I will be in market for a.20+ x scope.
Thanks all.
Flatlander
  

NRA Life
ASSRA Member 3197
Charcoal Burner
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Nero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1030
Location: NZ
Joined: Jun 1st, 2006
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #6 - Aug 9th, 2026 at 5:46pm
Print Post  
I bought a 24 fixed power scope thinking it had to be better but it showed up all my faults too much when I sighted it in at a hundred metres.
Went back to my fixed 12 power Leupold.
« Last Edit: Aug 9th, 2026 at 6:52pm by Nero »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gnoahhh
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1088
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Joined: Mar 31st, 2010
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #7 - Aug 9th, 2026 at 6:13pm
Print Post  
It's not entirely about the magnification. In the 1 1/2"-series of Targetspots and Unertls I'll agree that 20x is a pretty good place to be and is my general favorite. But, when I inherited a Unertl 2" with 1" tube in 15x a couple years ago I had my eyes opened, literally. Holy Mack'l, Andy, it's brighter and clearer than my 20's and I can see .32 bullet holes at 200 with it just fine with my 73 year old peepers.

There's something to be said for large lenses.

Same generalizations can be made re: lens quality/diameter versus simple high magnification in spotting scopes too, IMO.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1839
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #8 - Aug 9th, 2026 at 7:00pm
Print Post  
gnoahhh wrote on Aug 9th, 2026 at 6:13pm:
It's not entirely about the magnification. In the 1 1/2"-series of Targetspots and Unertls I'll agree that 20x is a pretty good place to be and is my general favorite. But, when I inherited a Unertl 2" with 1" tube in 15x a couple years ago I had my eyes opened, literally. Holy Mack'l, Andy, it's brighter and clearer than my 20's and I can see .32 bullet holes at 200 with it just fine with my 73 year old peepers.

There's something to be said for large lenses.

Same generalizations can be made re: lens quality/diameter versus simple high magnification in spotting scopes too, IMO.

Yesterday, I was shooting my 25-35 at a match in Harris and could not see the bullet holes with my 16X Unertl when the shots were in the red. I gave up and switched to my 32-40 with a Redfield 3200 16X on it. My sighter target was still up for the 25-35 and I could see the bullet holes clearly with the Redfield. Resolution is everything. I know nothing about how resolution works and with the different lens manufacturers?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Flatlander
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 719
Location: Warm Arizona
Joined: Apr 24th, 2004
Re: Scope Magnification
Reply #9 - Aug 10th, 2026 at 2:30pm
Print Post  
My Unertl 12x is a 1" tube and 2" objective so it is really bright. Only complaint other than low power is weight. Benchrest isn't a problem but if I ever decide to shoot off hand again it's a little heavy to hoist and hold.
Flatlander
  

NRA Life
ASSRA Member 3197
Charcoal Burner
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint