Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Stevens 47? (Read 1668 times)
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1398
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #15 - yesterday at 4:12am
Print Post  
As is, the buttplate's reconfiguration is fairly common and neatly done, and can be retained as part of the rifle's "story".  But it can also be rebuilt; someone here - I can't remember who - did it fairly recently and provided some helpful photos.  In any case, some creative "whittling"of a new upper prong is required, which is then welded/brazed in place and blended in.  The easiest way to refinish is with nickle plating, which is how many were originally done.  You could, of course, have a completely new plate fitted and finished.  But I assume yours is the original and therefore much worth retaining.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12278
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #16 - yesterday at 9:07am
Print Post  
Dellet wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 11:03am:
Probably a model 44 Schuetzen. It was a large frame 44 action, with double set triggers. 

The action was 1.25” wide instead of 1.125”. Big difference was the height. Being about 2” instead of 1 3/4.

Hope you have the whole rifle, not real common.


The Schuetzen model had a safety lug on the hammer. Extractor in my rifle was stamped 38-55. 
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1280
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #17 - yesterday at 10:30am
Print Post  
westerner wrote yesterday at 9:07am:
Dellet wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 11:03am:
Probably a model 44 Schuetzen. It was a large frame 44 action, with double set triggers. 

The action was 1.25” wide instead of 1.125”. Big difference was the height. Being about 2” instead of 1 3/4.

Hope you have the whole rifle, not real common.


The Schuetzen model had a safety lug on the hammer. Extractor in my rifle was stamped 38-55. 

Cedestech rifle may not have had a lugged hammer. Not sure if it was originally a 22 LR or converted. The Schuetzen rifle not being common, probably even less as a rimfire. If it has a lugged hammer, I wonder if it had a center fire barrel and block.originally?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12278
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #18 - yesterday at 11:07am
Print Post  
Mine in the picture was converted from center fire. Extractor was stamped 38-55. Not sure if RF 44 Schuetzen actions had the hammer safety.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jamey
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 31
Location: Hilltowns of Albany County NY
Joined: Jun 3rd, 2021
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #19 - yesterday at 11:10am
Print Post  
Kind of an obvious question-what is stamped on the face of the action under the forearm?
Beautiful gun, no matter what it is…
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Andover Arms
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 103
Joined: Dec 24th, 2017
Re: Stevens 47?
Reply #20 - yesterday at 7:56pm
Print Post  
Whether or not a Model 44 had a "lugged hammer" was based on the factory caliber and not any particular model....IMHO. I would be interested in the receiver face number stamping as well. regards.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint