ASSRA Forum - N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R?

ASSRA Forum › General › Reloading the Single Shot Rifle › N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R?

(Moderator Group: Moderator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? (Read 435 times)

hopkinskid Junior Member Offline ASSRA Board Member Posts: 96 Location: Hopkins, MI Joined: May 12^th, 2020	N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Oct 25^th, 2025 at 11:19am	Print Post
	Has anyone played with this powder in these calibers? 165 and/or 180 grain bullets. Thanks! Geoff


	IP Logged

frnkeore Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 7518 Location: Central Point, OR 97502 Joined: Jun 16^th, 2010	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #1 - Oct 25^th, 2025 at 4:08pm	Print Post
	I've used it quite a bit in both those calibers but, with heavier bullets, 190 to 206 gr in 32/40 and 170-197 gr in 8.15x46r. 12.5 - 13.5 in 32/40 and have gone as high as 15.0. My best 8.15x46r was 10.5 gr but, 12.0 gr 4227 had better accuracy, all loads BSed.

	ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
	YIM AIM IP Logged

KaiserKong Junior Member Offline Posts: 97 Joined: Apr 26^th, 2022	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #2 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 4:14pm	Print Post
	I have had good luck with N110 in 8.15x46R. The N100 series of powders is very similar to IMR series, both are nitrocellulose (single based) stick powders and come over a range of burn rates. N110 corresponds most similar to IMR 4227. The plot below shows the velocity I get from my Aydt with different charges of IMR 4227 in green and N110 in red (only one point, 11 gr). For the same charge it gives a bit higher velocity compared to 4227. This is with a 182 gr stop-ring bullet (32-182L from Accurate molds) with a 20/1 alloy. I find that given the charge only fills about 40% capacity so it tends to be somewhat position sensitive. I have tried light kapok puff and crumpled up blotting paper. The kapok does a better job of getting the velocities more uniform. I was using mostly Fed 210 and Rem 9 1/2 primers for my tests if that matters too. Happy to answer any more questions if you have any. Thanks, -Dave


	IP Logged

Saratoga Bill Participating Member Offline Posts: 46 Location: Saratoga NY or Crystal River F Joined: Oct 18^th, 2016	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #3 - Oct 31^st, 2025 at 12:06pm	Print Post
	Just started working with 110 in my 32-40s. Initial loads around 13 grains with a 185 grain spitzer have looked very promising.


	IP Logged

hopkinskid Junior Member Offline ASSRA Board Member Posts: 96 Location: Hopkins, MI Joined: May 12^th, 2020	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #4 - Nov 2^nd, 2025 at 6:32am	Print Post
	Thanks, guys! Geoff


	IP Logged

oneatatime Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4174 Location: Rocky Mountains Joined: Oct 30^th, 2011	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #5 - Nov 2^nd, 2025 at 11:44am	Print Post
	I had to go look up the differences between N110 and H110. VV N110 is a single base extruded powder and cleaner burning than Hodgdon's H110 granular powder and supposed to avoid some of the possible problems of H110. It is also more expensive. Saratoga Bill, which "110"?


	IP Logged

hopkinskid Junior Member Offline ASSRA Board Member Posts: 96 Location: Hopkins, MI Joined: May 12^th, 2020	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #6 - Nov 2^nd, 2025 at 4:32pm	Print Post
	N110:Vihtavuori


	IP Logged

Saratoga Bill Participating Member Offline Posts: 46 Location: Saratoga NY or Crystal River F Joined: Oct 18^th, 2016	Re: N110 load data for .32-40 and/or 8.15 x 46 R? Reply #7 - yesterday at 12:40pm	Print Post
	sorry N110


	IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Page completed in 0.9450 seconds.