ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
    Offline
Posts: 1984
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16 th, 2004
|
Re: Smokeless powder in vintage rifles, your thoughts?
Reply #2 - Aug 9th, 2025 at 3:41pm
|
Print Post
|
I worked in a field that stresses designing safe practices into things systemically, so as to avoid user error. So, my loading practices are designed around that principle. The first rule I use is never use double base powders. This is for two reasons. One, is they are more energy dense. We don't need that for big old blackpowder cartridges, and the small amount of powder in a case can make double charges or overloads harder to spot. Two, they have steep pressure curves when they reach certain pressures. So, they aren't forgiving of overloads. Third, there is some evidence that they may cause detonations or chamber ringing, if certain procedures are not followed. The second rule is I try to fill the case more than 1/2 full. This really helps guard against double loads, or even substantial overloads. The argument for faster, more dense powders is twofold usually. First and foremost, they're cheaper because small amounts of powder can be used. Second, they may burn cleaner or ignite better. My own choice has been to just buy more powder, in the interest of safety instead of using small higher pressure powder loads. And, to just look for suitable powders that burn well, instead of going to the small fast burning charges. My powder of choice for many cartridges has been IMR 4198. It ignites well, isn't position sensitive, burns pretty clean and fills the case substantially. I started out using Unique and Herco and Trap 100, but moved away from those fast burning powders for the safety reasons noted above.
|