Yep, I know it isn't a single shot.  It is an Model 1892 Krag-Jorgensen infantry rifle, caliber .30-40 Krag, but with a Schuetzen stock and a vernier (maybe?) tang sight.

Is it a Schuetzen?  Or is this just a hunting rifle with a very full curve buttplate?  Does anyone recognize the tang sight?

SN for the receiver dates from July or August 1895.  What a lot of work! 

The tang sight is a Farrow...

Early Fred Adolph target/sporter model?

Bill Lawrence

1912 Olympic free rifle?....look on 1912 Olympic site..one fellow holding Martini rifle with what looks to be a tang site.

GT wrote on Jun 17^th, 2025 at 5:56pm:


Oh my!  Can I imagine a Farrow connection?   

Farrow was a modernist.  As soon as smokeless powder and jacketed bullets appeared, he largely abandoned black powder and lead bullets.  Single shots were obsolete, relics of the past.

Farrow shot Krags in competition at Sea Girt.  He was an officer in the District of Columbia National Guard, shot on their team and competed as an NRA member in non-military matches, including the 800-900 & 1,000 yard matches.   

In the military competitions, he shot an "issue" Krag rifle, but almost certainly one he had worked over.  But there were "any rifle" matches also, and Farrow's name is on the score sheets.  In the 1908 "any rifle" matches, Farrow used a Winchester High Wall in .30-40 Krag.

Mercy, I wish it were mine!

Just goes to show what happens with a little ingenuity and a sense of aesthetics.

Dick,
That is one of the prettiest Krag's I can remember seeing and I'm a bit of a Krag snob.  I have a stripped action that now has a plan, thanks for sharing.

I attached a couple pics of an original Farrow sight, except for the eyepiece embellishment and the font on it is one of the comparing factors.  The PU sights have a little different font.   Compare if you can.   
Greg

Gorgeous rifle and a design I never caught up to. So many interesting elements and features. Thanks for offering this up. 

BTW the stock maker sure took a healthy bite out of the stock for bolt landing 

Rick

Here is a Feuerstutzen based on a Mauser 88 carbine. Ad says the front of the barrel is rust pitted. The price is not unreasonable so thought about getting to rebarrel

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

calledflyer wrote on Jun 19^th, 2025 at 4:39pm:


I think he  just took the angle that the bolt handle took from the action and kept the slopes all the way to keep the area uniform. No weaker than if he'd used an ugly straight slot out from the action. I like it. [/quote]

My comment had no bearing on quality or strength it was just something that caught my eye and like the entire package it's  " gorgeous "

Rick

Schwarzstock, there is a lot of barrel out there and you don't need the front sight with the scope. Just whack off the bad part and you have a nice 8.15x46R or even turn the bad part into a bloop tube and keep the looks.

calledflyer wrote on Jun 19^th, 2025 at 4:39pm:


Nah, the stocker merely mimicked the bolt cutout that was a design feature on military M1892 & M1896 Krag rifles and carbines. It was eliminated on the M1898's and replaced with a simple straight slot.

I think he  just took the angle that the bolt handle took from the action and kept the slopes all the way to keep the area uniform. No weaker than if he'd used an ugly straight slot out from the action. I like it. [/quote]

I've spent a lot of time looking for anything that would tie this marvelous old Krag to W. Milton Farrow or to the NRA and New Jersey National Guard matches at Sea Girt.  I'd pretty much struck out until I found a reference in the NRA's Annual Report for 1904.  The report on the Schuetzen match listed 10 competitors.  An asterisk (*) preceded the names of 3 competitors.  At the end of the match report, the asterisk indicated shot with "Krag" rifle.  "Krag" was in quotations, implying (to me) that it was not an ordinary Krag.

The Sea Girt Schuetzen match was shot at 200 yards using the German 25-ring target.  The target is the same as we use today, but there were 25 rings, hence the name.  Bigger paper?

It was an offhand match, shot with the body free of support.  Rules were "any rifle, any sight, any caliber, set triggers allowed.  Cleaning between shots allowed". A Krag shooting military cartridges would be very much of a handicap.  A *Krag fitted with a stock designed for offhand shooting, firing handloads with cast bullets, might be competitive.

The match at Sea Girt was a 3-shot re-entry match.  As I understand it, each competitor stood at the firing point, probably next to a loading bench, and slowly fired 3 shots at his target.  After Shooter A fired his 3 shots, it was Shooter B's turn.  After all shooters had fired at their first targets, the second round of competition began, and after that, the third and final round.  Each shooter could score a maximum of 75 points per target.  3 target scores were added for the final score, with 225 points being maximum. It's a long, slow match.  Plenty of time to share the *Krag, unless there were 3. Were there 3?

Owen Smith won, 213 points.  Harry Pope, 2nd with 211.  Dr. Walter G. Hudson, 4th with 209.  *Pvt. Robert Lee Pile, D.C. Natl Guard, was 6th with 208.  *James G. Dillin was 8th with another 208.  *Capt. William C. Gannon, N.J. Natl Guard, was 9th with 204.  I've learned about Pile and Gannon, but not much about Dillin. Maybe his name was misspelled.

Was there more than one *Krag?  I'll bet not.  Where was Farrow? He'd had an argument with the NRA's Board of Directors over annual memberships and lost.  His name doesn't appear in the 1904 Annual Report.  But was he at Sea Girt with the rifle?

Good heavens look at that stock.  Hey am I the first guy that posted an ‘I’d buy that’?!?!!