Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) 38-55 long vs short (Read 1431 times)
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
38-55 long vs short
Mar 16th, 2025 at 1:05am
Print Post  
Took a peek at 38-55 long case fitment in two rifles. Looks like I have a lot of open space. Have not tested the rifles on paper yet from the bench but not getting any leading. 

Anyone else have a similar situation and pictures?
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3677
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #1 - Mar 16th, 2025 at 9:10am
Print Post  
I would like to hear somebody explain why a perfect fitting case is so important to them. Myself, and zillions of others have fired cases of both shorter and full-length in rifles and never spotted a bit of difference in accuracy. Depending of things, cleaning may change a small bit, but never a difficult problem. 
I do, prefer to have each set of cases shot during a session to be equal in order to maintain even neck tension, bullet jump if any, and things like that. Simple consistency within each testing batch. So, let's hear folks, Joe and I are eager to listen Shocked
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
art_ruggiero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1151
Location: CT
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #2 - Mar 16th, 2025 at 10:12am
Print Post  
short cases with BP tend to cause a lead ring because the bullet bumps up between the leade and case mouth   art
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KFW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 575
Location: Powell Wy.
Joined: Dec 18th, 2016
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #3 - Mar 16th, 2025 at 11:35am
Print Post  
And it can be murder on paper patch loads.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3067
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #4 - Mar 16th, 2025 at 12:55pm
Print Post  
Murder?  First we have harassment now murder?  What is happening to this forum?   

Jack
  

ASSRA # 11318
I haven’t lost all my marbles yet but there is definitely a hole in the bag somewhere.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3677
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #5 - Mar 16th, 2025 at 2:21pm
Print Post  
I appreciate the responses. Thank goodness, I don't get blamed for murder- I never shoot paper patched bullets. Or black powder for that matter. I have my reasons, of course.
I wouldn't have known of those things had I opted to do something in that line, but good to know such. I don't understand the lead ring, since I shoot slugs well over the groove size without leading-amounts to the same as bumped up it would seem to me. And isn't a suitable taper a good idea with the paper wrapping? Not to start a further discussion of this stuff, but would still like to hear about case length for the majority of us shooting easy to deal with smokeless powders. I believe that is more in the line of the original question. Huh
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #6 - Mar 17th, 2025 at 9:28am
Print Post  
New Starline case measuring 2.125.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #7 - Mar 17th, 2025 at 9:29am
Print Post  
.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Oakdale
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 65
Location: Maplewood, MN
Joined: Jun 7th, 2017
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #8 - Mar 18th, 2025 at 12:49pm
Print Post  
You guys will know more about this subject. With the .38-55 cases of the two lengths, will it be a “problem” using either one, if you are breach seating with smokeless? The same weight of powder in either case, will be the same height at the top of the powder column.

Tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #9 - Mar 18th, 2025 at 4:47pm
Print Post  
My thought has always been that the gap would effect fixed ammo only. Most all fixed loads I have ever shot are with jacketed bullets or black powder and lead bullets. 

The only rifle in the nine pictures that I can remember having leading is the Meacham Badger. I don't see a gap in that throat.  Undecided
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
WVsmoke
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 32
Location: West Virginia
Joined: Feb 17th, 2023
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #10 - Mar 18th, 2025 at 5:55pm
Print Post  
Westerner,
      The cause with black powder is the pressure curve and how it differs from smokeless pressure curve.  Black powder has an immediate spike which bumps up lead bullets immediately.  Smokeless powder “burns” and builds to a peak over a longer time period, thus no immediate bump.  That is how I understands it.
Allan
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #11 - Mar 19th, 2025 at 8:46pm
Print Post  
WVsmoke wrote on Mar 18th, 2025 at 5:55pm:
Westerner,
      The cause with black powder is the pressure curve and how it differs from smokeless pressure curve.  Black powder has an immediate spike which bumps up lead bullets immediately.  Smokeless powder “burns” and builds to a peak over a longer time period, thus no immediate bump.  That is how I understands it.
Allan


Yes I agree but I still can't tell any difference in accuracy long vs short shells. I've not spent a lot of time on the bench with lead bullet fixed loads. I use long brass because in theory it should cause less damage to a bullet during obturation. 

I do know for a fact that fast burning smokeless powders can obturate lead bullets. Suppose I could do a  lot of experimenting but by golly those components are expensive and they don't grow on trees.  Cry
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3067
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #12 - Mar 19th, 2025 at 9:06pm
Print Post  
Wes,
I planted a Remington small rifle primer tree years ago.  It is now producing about 1500 primers per year.  It took quite a while to find the right pollinator though.  I finally used some 218 Bees!
  

ASSRA # 11318
I haven’t lost all my marbles yet but there is definitely a hole in the bag somewhere.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11697
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #13 - Mar 19th, 2025 at 9:13pm
Print Post  
You crack me up, Jack.   Grin
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3677
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: 38-55 long vs short
Reply #14 - Mar 20th, 2025 at 9:47am
Print Post  
Joe, some of those components really do 'grow on trees'. Or, have you forgotten that the charcoal that forms black powder was once a limb on an oak,or ash, or something...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint