Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Boulder river foundry (Read 1708 times)
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1857
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #15 - Jan 20th, 2025 at 2:29pm
Print Post  
A spin caster will work for brass, silver, gold, pewter, etc.  But, steel casting is another animal entirely, and needs done by a foundry set up to do it.  

I have a centrifugal casting machine, wax injector, mold making frames, etc to do production casting.  For the easy metals, investment plaster is enough for the mold.  For steel, they use ceramic shell casting techniques, where the initial mold is created by dipping the wax in a liquid ceramic that forms a hard, slick shell.  That is repeated until a satisfactory thickness is achieved, and then that is usually further encased in another setting plaster investment.  I think most steel casting is done with gravity feed, or maybe with vacuum assist rather than with centrifugal.  Because of that, it needs sprued and treed differently than jewelry metals.  It's usually best to give the foundry the waxes, and let them sprue it up for the casting, as they know what their process needs.

For what it's worth, I've had good luck using plastic instead of wax for models.  I've done that for preprinted letters, numbers, etc. as well as some shapes of items I've found in plastic that I wanted in metal.   It may be possible to 3d print models from a 3D program like solidworks, and then use those for the "wax" for the cast.  That would be an easy way to proportionally size up for the shrinkage.  I've even had pretty good luck with some light woods like cedar and balsa, as long as I was real careful to shake out the ashes from the investment mold after I burned out the model.

I've got a correction to what I posted earlier on shrinkage of steel.  Doing some research online, it appears that a shrinkage of about 2% is typical for steel.  Some additional is lost due to surface finishing loss.

Brass is about half of that, so if you do a check piece in brass and modify that for your mold master, keep that in mind.
« Last Edit: Jan 20th, 2025 at 2:37pm by ssdave »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16444
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #16 - Jan 20th, 2025 at 4:21pm
Print Post  
When I worked at the local steel foundry we used silicone sand to form molds and then those were heated to remove the wax forms used to make the molds. The forms were mounted on trees that held numerous copies to be cast at one time. Small parts had sometimes a couple dozen parts on one tree. 
Once cast they shook the sand off and cut the risers and sprues off on big bandsaws before going to final finishing. The castings were amazingly close to finished sizes, and only needed minor work done by the end user who ordered them.
They sprayed a creamy white substance over the forms before spraying multiple coats of the silicone sand on. I was told the white substance was harder, and smoother so castings came out smoother.
Silicone sand is horrible smelly stuff when hot steel hits those molds! I hated the smell, and even showering after work and changing clothes didn't get rid of the smell. I finally quit as no amount of money could make me stay there.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1591
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #17 - Jan 20th, 2025 at 9:15pm
Print Post  
I heard Jim Kibler of Kibler Longrifles say that he used a special foam material for his patterns a few years ago.  I believe he said it was specifically for pattern making and is very dense.  Anyone know what this is?   
I use to be able to email Jim with questions, but his business has gotten so large that I think he doesn’t have time anymore.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 636
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #18 - Jan 21st, 2025 at 6:44am
Print Post  
3D printing has become a big part in the investment casting business. Using this process the need for the "wax mold" for prototype/small run can be eliminated. Models are 3D printed and then coated with the investment. The 3D printing is then burned out leaving the cavity for the casting metal. In the 2014 time frame I had built 200 prototype gas valve castings made and machined for Honeywell, who I worked for at the time. Now these were fairly large casting, (~ 9 x 6 x 5") out of aluminum and required extensive machining after casting. As I remember the project cost was just short of $300K. But a mold for these prototypes would have added significantly to the prototyping project cost.
Peter Allen, of Allen Foundry, and I, back in the 1990's,  always talked about making a model of an experimental rifle action out of wood, then investing it. After we would burn out the wood using very high temp and feed into the cavity oxygen to get a clean burn. We never tried the experiment but I think it would  have worked. In fact I still have one of the models I built that we were going to try.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1478
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #19 - Jan 21st, 2025 at 11:02am
Print Post  
At Boulder River they had rubber moulds to cast the wax impressions of the parts.  Then this lady would take a bunch of the wax forms and affix them to a wax stalk with a funnel shape at the top.  She used a little electric soldering iron type thing to melt the stuff together.  The final result looked like a tree of wax parts.

They’d take this wax tree and dip it in a slurry of some kind of porcelain and let it dry between dips.  When it was thick enough, they’d put it upside down into an oven.  They’d run it at low heat until most of the wax melted out, and they recovered this for reuse.  Then they’d turn the oven up to firing heat and fuse the ceramic. This would burn the remaining wax away.

They’d put the parts “tree” right side up in a crucible and pour and pack fine sand around it.  They’d have a bunch of these crucibles sitting around the furnace, and when the metal was melted they’d fill all of them.

When the metal cooled, they’d pour out the sand for reuse, break the ceramic, and there was a “tree” of fully formed metal parts.  They’d cut the parts off and scrap the extraneous metal, no reuse of that metal once they cast it.

The parts would go into the machine shop for final machining and finishing.  Very little needed to be taken off; the Sharps castings looked much less bulky than the Highwall castings shown.

The guy who ran the foundry was the son-on law of Shiloh’s owner.  He told me that Kirk had come to him and said he was tired of being pushed to the end of the line every time Pine Tree Castings got a big run for a military contract and asked Bob if he’d like to run the foundry he was going to set up at Shiloh.  Bob said, “I’d be glad to help, but I drive a lumber truck; I don’t know anything about foundry practice.” And Kirk told him, “Looks like we’re both going to learn a lot, then.”

From every indication I saw, they’d learned it and learned it well.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stank
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Location: USA
Joined: Jan 12th, 2025
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #20 - Jan 22nd, 2025 at 1:13pm
Print Post  
Lots of great info here. 
Thanks
Stank
  

Stank
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nuclearcricket
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 774
Joined: Oct 15th, 2008
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #21 - Jan 22nd, 2025 at 1:18pm
Print Post  
I wonder how hard it would be to find a place and then have them make the rubber molds? I have all the parts in as cast condition that I would consider having molds made for. I also wonder how hard it would be to make a few small changes to the rubber molds to make small changes on the final parts?
Sam
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1857
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #22 - Jan 22nd, 2025 at 4:48pm
Print Post  
nuclearcricket wrote on Jan 22nd, 2025 at 1:18pm:
I wonder how hard it would be to find a place and then have them make the rubber molds? I have all the parts in as cast condition that I would consider having molds made for. I also wonder how hard it would be to make a few small changes to the rubber molds to make small changes on the final parts?
Sam


I bet if you do a search, you can find a place.  Alternatively, sounds like a business opportunity for someone to step in behind Rodney and do some of this work.

I have the mold frames, wax injector, etc. that I haven't used since I was a goldsmith.  Probably could replicate enough equipment to make your own molds for $1000 or so.  Here's the place to buy:

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

This thread has got me thinking I should make up molds for a few hard to get parts,  make a bunch of waxes and have them cast up.  However, that seems like work and time spent, and I've been trying to keep myself retired.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nuclearcricket
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 774
Joined: Oct 15th, 2008
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #23 - Jan 22nd, 2025 at 7:24pm
Print Post  
ssdave, your mind and mine kind of run on the same track. I have a complete casting set for a #7 rolling block but its not one of Rodneys, that I know of. I have 2 of Rodneys castings that I have been working on. The virgin set is different in that it has the rear sight base cast in place and the breach block has the notch cast in place for the sliding extractor. My thoughts were if I could find a place to make me the rubber molds I could go from there. I know that there is a small company here in PA that could most likely make the molds I just have to do the leg work to track them down. I happened to run onto them on a PBS program that highlights PA businesses.  I guess some phone calls are in order. One change that I would like to make is to reduce the cast in hole for the barrel shank so that it could be threaded 3/4 instead of 7/8". That would allow you to use a smaller barrel if you wanted. With a 1" receiver thickness and a 7/8" barrel shank it doesn't leave you a lot of room for a shoulder. 
Sam
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bobw
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1591
Location: NW, Iowa
Joined: Mar 19th, 2013
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #24 - Jan 22nd, 2025 at 7:31pm
Print Post  
Sam, If I remember correctly, Rodneys original #7 casting sets had the rear sight base cast into it.
Bob
  

Robert Warren
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 636
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #25 - Jan 23rd, 2025 at 6:13am
Print Post  
nuclearcricket wrote on Jan 22nd, 2025 at 1:18pm:
I wonder how hard it would be to find a place and then have them make the rubber molds? I have all the parts in as cast condition that I would consider having molds made for. I also wonder how hard it would be to make a few small changes to the rubber molds to make small changes on the final parts?
Sam
 
You need to consider the issue of shrinkage. The waxes must be a known percentage larger then the desired cast dimension to compensate for the shrinkage of the metal from the molten state to the cooled solid state. Which for steel would probably be around 2.5 to 4%. In other words a 1" thick casting you might have now and you used it as a model for the wax, when cast in steel it could only be .960" thick.
I think in the past some guys, selling casting kits, tried that route and ran into all kinds of fit, function, and form issues.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1077
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #26 - Jan 24th, 2025 at 8:30am
Print Post  
There is the shrinkage of the wax and the shrinkage of the cast material. Both must be taken into account. Then there are different waxes with different shrinkage rates also. One part I had made came out larger than I expected. I asked why and was told that they had used a filled wax because of the shape of the part and that was the reason. He said on some parts the filled wax results in fewer rejects. Most molds are rigid, not flexible like the rubber molds and the wax needs to be removed from the mold so some shrinkage is necessary.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 636
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Boulder river foundry
Reply #27 - Jan 24th, 2025 at 3:54pm
Print Post  
Deadeye Bly wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 8:30am:
There is the shrinkage of the wax and the shrinkage of the cast material. Both must be taken into account. Then there are different waxes with different shrinkage rates also. One part I had made came out larger than I expected. I asked why and was told that they had used a filled wax because of the shape of the part and that was the reason. He said on some parts the filled wax results in fewer rejects. Most molds are rigid, not flexible like the rubber molds and the wax needs to be removed from the mold so some shrinkage is necessary.

Welcome to the world of molding engineering. The world I lived +40 years before retiring Smiley 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint