marlinguy wrote on Nov 30
th, 2024 at 4:59pm:
I'm confused now?
If the Palma Match rules stated rifles had to be the country's government issue military rifle, then why was the question of a Hepburn used ever even a question? As far as I know no Hepburn rifles were the standard military rifle?
Different match, different rules, maybe different competitors. Just the same range, same distances, targets, # of shots & scoring. Held on the day after the Palma Match. This match was between a team from the Ulster Rifle Club and a team from the New Jersey Rifle Association. I don't know who the team members were. But the Irish team used state-of-the-art target rifles and handloads suited to those rifles.
I learned of this match from a paragraph in David Minshall's "Research Press Digest 2024". Only one partial sentence told about the NJRA team. "and The Americans used a rifle produced by Remington Arms Company".
But from 2 separate accounts of the 1901 matches at Sea Girt, I've learned that Walter Hudson was present, was a member of the NJRA, and was probably on the NJRA team. Also present but not NJRA members were Harry Pope and W. Milton Farrow. I don't know for sure who the Remington representative was, but there would have been one, simply good business.
In the next part of Minshall's Digest, he reports that Louis Hepburn was present at a meeting of old-time long range shooters held in NYC on Dec. 14, 1901. If Hepburn was in NYC in December, he might well have been at Sea Girt the previous September, maybe as the Remington rep.
Another clue comes from comparing the scores for the Palma with this "Challenge" match. Palma shot on Sept. 5, this match on Sept. 6. Palma scores: Canada, 1522; America, 1494. "Challenge" match scores: Ulster, 1620; NJRA, 1558. Same range, same format, but the Palma was shot with military rifles & ordinary military ammunition, the "Challenge" match with target rifles and hand loaded ammunition.