Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP? (Read 2112 times)
burntwater
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 413
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #15 - Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:36pm
Print Post  
There is a very long list of plastic resins that will not support static electricity. Military, aerospace, electronic components with various resin cast parts and covers are such. Today’s carbon fiber aircraft parts including fuselage and wings are static free. Static electricity bottom line will destroy almost all sensitive electronic sub-assembly parts including circuit boards. I have no idea what inexpensive powder containers are roto-molded from but I’m sure they are ESd type 
( electrostatic discharge ) Plastics.

On my plastic reservoir Redding powder throws I dip in dish soap and let dry problem solved

Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GunBum
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 200
Location: SW Missouri
Joined: Oct 30th, 2021
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #16 - Aug 29th, 2024 at 7:40pm
Print Post  
I rub the plastic reservoir on my Redding powder measure with dryer sheets.  Otherwise ball powders and small flake powders like to stick.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wesg
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 295
Joined: Sep 13th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #17 - Aug 29th, 2024 at 11:14pm
Print Post  
Black plastic. Something made it black. Maybe carbon ... which is at least somewhat conductive ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1465
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #18 - Aug 30th, 2024 at 1:25pm
Print Post  
I took a couple empty black plastic powder canisters to work one day and tested them on our Shoe Tester.

This was a pair of platforms with an ohm meter between them.  You stood on the platforms in your conductive safety shoes and if the impedance was less than 5 ohms, you were OK to work with energetic materials.  If it was more, you had enough dirt on the shoe soles, weren't wearing the proper cotton socks, or whatever, and the situation needed to be corrected before you could work in the labs.

One canister had held Swiss black powder, and the other one was a round Hodgdon smokeless canister.  The Swiss container read less than 5 ohms, the Hodgdon read infinity.  So I figured the Swiss packaging had been done in accordance with their safety practices (and had, of course, added to the cost) while the Hodgdon containers reflected the lower  sensitivity to electrostatic initiation that smokeless powder has.

Olde Eynsford didn't exist back then and all other black powders from Goex came in metal cans, so I never repeated the test.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1681
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #19 - Aug 30th, 2024 at 2:14pm
Print Post  
GunBum wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:27pm:
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?

Cheers,
Steve


It’s a special kind of plastic that won’t hold a static charge.  I was generalizing in my comments.  There are always exceptions to everything.

That and the fact that the sensitivity to static discharge is only as dust, above LEL, suspended in the air...
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
GunBum
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 200
Location: SW Missouri
Joined: Oct 30th, 2021
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #20 - Aug 30th, 2024 at 9:29pm
Print Post  
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 2:14pm:
GunBum wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:27pm:
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?

Cheers,
Steve


It’s a special kind of plastic that won’t hold a static charge.  I was generalizing in my comments.  There are always exceptions to everything.

That and the fact that the sensitivity to static discharge is only as dust, above LEL, suspended in the air...


Not true.  Black powder kernels are ignitable by static discharge.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2836
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #21 - Aug 30th, 2024 at 11:20pm
Print Post  
Not scientific, but years ago I tried to ignite 4F kernels with a static charge from the internals of a long gas lighter.  All it did was to puch them around the desktop.  Don't take this as an indication that static is not dangerous around BP.  I am sure you have heard the story of the welder who thought storing BP in a metal coffee can with a plastic lid was a good idea.  Sparks will set off BP!
  

ASSRA # 11318
just a bit of a hoot.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1911
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #22 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 1:44am
Print Post  
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?
Cheers,
Steve


Steve,

The containers are made of antistatic plastic.  Although antistatic plastic can be made in many colors, clear, red, etc., the plastic containers BP is shipped in are typically black and contain small amounts of carbon to make the plastic slightly conductive to electricity (antistatic).  So, pouring BP out of the containers cannot build up a static charge.

The development of antistatic plastic was the result of the semiconductor industries need to reduce the cost of shipping integrated circuits (ICs) in the 1980’s, which were commonly shipped in “conductive” aluminum tubes at the time.  Some ICs are sensitive to even low levels of static discharge.  Most of my career was spent in the semiconductor industry and I remember reading at the time that materials with a surface resistance of as much as several hundred thousand ohms per square inch would drain away any static charge.  Using a standard VOM (volt ohm meter) or multi-meter, one can actually determine if the plastic used in BP shipping bottles is antistatic.

To verify I grabbed a black plastic bottle of Swiss 1.5Fg and my handy Harbor Freight multi-meter, the one they use to give away if you purchase anything at the store.  With the meter set on ohms and the sharp-tip probes inserted into the plastic about an inch apart, the resistance was around 300,000 ohms, sufficient to eliminate a static charge buildup.  Just to double check, I also used an expensive multi-meter with the same results.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1681
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #23 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 2:11am
Print Post  
GunBum wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 9:29pm:
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 2:14pm:
GunBum wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:27pm:
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?

Cheers,
Steve


It’s a special kind of plastic that won’t hold a static charge.  I was generalizing in my comments.  There are always exceptions to everything.

That and the fact that the sensitivity to static discharge is only as dust, above LEL, suspended in the air...


Not true.  Black powder kernels are ignitable by static discharge. 

A static discharge in a typical home, non-industrial environment?  With all the charcoal (carbon) in there, acting as a conductor?
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
GunBum
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 200
Location: SW Missouri
Joined: Oct 30th, 2021
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #24 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 10:16am
Print Post  
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 31st, 2024 at 2:11am:
GunBum wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 9:29pm:
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 2:14pm:
GunBum wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:27pm:
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?

Cheers,
Steve


It’s a special kind of plastic that won’t hold a static charge.  I was generalizing in my comments.  There are always exceptions to everything.

That and the fact that the sensitivity to static discharge is only as dust, above LEL, suspended in the air...


Not true.  Black powder kernels are ignitable by static discharge. 

A static discharge in a typical home, non-industrial environment?  With all the charcoal (carbon) in there, acting as a conductor?

 
This is why I don’t usually comment on stuff like this.  There’s always an expert on the internet who contradicts hundreds of thousands of lab tests.

I’m not talking about discharging through the plastic powder container.  It only takes less than 0.5% carbon black to make an HDPE container a very dark black color, so I don’t know what you mean by “all that charcoal.”  Velostat, or similar plastic containers are different.  How they are different?  Ask a polymer chemist or polymer engineer.  But they are different.  That’s why they are used for static sensitive materials.  That’s already been engineered out.  All the other plastic in your loading room hasn’t necessarily been thought of.

When you rub your feet on the carpet and shock someone, that’s well below the ignition energy for black powder.  You deliver much more energy when discharging than a barbecue lighter with the spark igniter.  Black powder is well into the sensitivity range for primary explosives.  So, can you set off a kernel of black powder sitting in a container?  Possible?  Yes.  Probable?  If the sun, the moon, and the stars align.  We all assume some level of risk when loading.  I’m ok with the low probability, but the probability is not zero, and definitely not only for clouds of dust above the LEL.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
steveu
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 61
Joined: Aug 21st, 2023
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #25 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 12:51pm
Print Post  
Thanks for the information and education.

Cheers,
Steve
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1681
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #26 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 2:11pm
Print Post  
GunBum wrote on Aug 31st, 2024 at 10:16am:
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 31st, 2024 at 2:11am:
GunBum wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 9:29pm:
MartiniBelgian wrote on Aug 30th, 2024 at 2:14pm:
GunBum wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 4:27pm:
steveu wrote on Aug 29th, 2024 at 1:12pm:
A question for gunbum, if plastic is bad, due to the possibility of a static discharge, why is all the BP from goex and Swiss in plastic containers?

Cheers,
Steve


It’s a special kind of plastic that won’t hold a static charge.  I was generalizing in my comments.  There are always exceptions to everything.

That and the fact that the sensitivity to static discharge is only as dust, above LEL, suspended in the air...


Not true.  Black powder kernels are ignitable by static discharge. 

A static discharge in a typical home, non-industrial environment?  With all the charcoal (carbon) in there, acting as a conductor?

 
This is why I don’t usually comment on stuff like this.  There’s always an expert on the internet who contradicts hundreds of thousands of lab tests.

I’m not talking about discharging through the plastic powder container.  It only takes less than 0.5% carbon black to make an HDPE container a very dark black color, so I don’t know what you mean by “all that charcoal.”  Velostat, or similar plastic containers are different.  How they are different?  Ask a polymer chemist or polymer engineer.  But they are different.  That’s why they are used for static sensitive materials.  That’s already been engineered out.  All the other plastic in your loading room hasn’t necessarily been thought of.

When you rub your feet on the carpet and shock someone, that’s well below the ignition energy for black powder.  You deliver much more energy when discharging than a barbecue lighter with the spark igniter.  Black powder is well into the sensitivity range for primary explosives.  So, can you set off a kernel of black powder sitting in a container?  Possible?  Yes.  Probable?  If the sun, the moon, and the stars align.  We all assume some level of risk when loading.  I’m ok with the low probability, but the probability is not zero, and definitely not only for clouds of dust above the LEL.

Yup, from the guy who sent quite a lot of time making explosion safety files in industry.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 413
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #27 - Aug 31st, 2024 at 4:06pm
Print Post  
For something as common as static discharge is most people don’t know how critical this condition is to a wide variety of materials and products. My Wife was a QA engineer for aerospace-satellite electronic components lots of very costly highly engineered circuit boards. She’d spend months watching and testing these boards then hours insuring they were packaged per spec to be 100% static proof. Then a courier would hand carry the package on the plane back to the assembly facility. Over the years many parts were ruined before they figured out packaging. On USN minesweepers there are discharge wands for anybody working around mines. 

Rick
« Last Edit: Aug 31st, 2024 at 4:13pm by burntwater »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MerwinBray
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Aw Gees

Posts: 938
Location: Kansas City, KS
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Is an Ideal No 5 powder measure safe with BP?
Reply #28 - Sep 3rd, 2024 at 5:31pm
Print Post  
Be sure to empty and clean/blow out the BP when not in use, especially if you’re in a humid area. The powder or powder dust will suck up the moisture and cause you unwanted issues. Ask me how I know……. Huh
  

Great Plains Precision Rifle Club
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint