Page Index Toggle Pages: [1]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Winchester 1885 LW problem (Read 3719 times)
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Winchester 1885 LW problem
Dec 8th, 2023 at 11:56am
Print Post  
Winchester 1885 Low Wall problem…

Here is an interesting problem to solve.  I have a Winchester 1885 Low Wall with a single set trigger and peep sight on the upper tang.  The serial range puts it at 1887.  It is an early Low Wall as it has the high block and not the scalloped block on later models,  It has the scalloped receiver and not the flat surface receiver as on later models.  The action shows some patina, but is very sound and tight.  It came to me without the butt stock (Butt stock on order from CPA). The barrel is a #1 and was stamped on the top flat of the barrel .22 LONG.  The barrel has been rebored and rifled by J. Stevens A&T Co. some time along the line, but the new caliber stamp was not applied.  It is in .25 caliber, appearing at first to be 25-20 Single Shot with the extractor fitted and the firing pin made to CF. I got hold of some new manufactured smokeless loaded cases from Buffalo Arms in 25-20 SS, RCBS die set, and some cast bullets. The rifle was cleaned and inspected and found to be sound.  I inserted the 25-20 SS round into the chamber and it does not fit, as it will fall under the extractor and is a loose fit in the chamber.  The extractor is cut too large to catch the 25-20 SS rim.  

So now I am thinking, what is going on here!  I cast the chamber and took some measurements.  The OAL and profile is good for the 25-20 SS (and not 25-20 WCF or .256 Win Mag) as no sharper shoulder is present. Taking measurements of the rim area at the breach end and extractor, it fits the 38/357 rim diameter perfectly.  The chamber is larger in diameter at the head too.  So now what is really going on here?  Has it been chambered for some obscure cartridge that used the 38/357 case head, 25-20 SS shallow taper profile, OAL and in .25 caliber?

I have a few choices and I will list them here.

1-Cut the breach end off, rethread, fit and chamber to 25-20 Single Shot, fit a new extractor.  I have the die set, and cases. I would have to rent the 25-20 SS finish reamer. Re-fit the forearm and main spring attachment point.

2-Install a barrel liner in 25-20 WCF from Brownells, fit the new extractor.  I would need to buy the deep hole drill and liner from Brownell. 25-20 WCF die set, cases and rent the finish reamer..

3-Set the barrel back, rethread, fit and chamber to .256 Win Mag.  I would not need to fit the extractor as it would fit the case head just right.  I would need to purchase a die set, cases and rent the finish reamer. 

I’m leaning on #1
« Last Edit: Dec 8th, 2023 at 4:32pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7131
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #1 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 3:55pm
Print Post  
I would suggest doing a chamber cast and get the actual chamber dimension. If the chamber isn't to much longer than the 357 Max, I would use the chamber, as is and form the cases to it.

You can then do more research on it. Maybe it a rare, long lost, Pope chambering that he only did, one time, for himself Smiley
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #2 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 4:08pm
Print Post  
As stated above the chamber cast has been performed.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1642
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #3 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 5:22pm
Print Post  
Have you checked the rate of twist? The 256 Winchester uses a 14 twist and it's also probably right at the edge of being safe in a low wall. If it were mine, I would probably go with option number one since you already have the dies and brass. An extractor is only fifty bucks and renting the reamer, or possibly borrowing one from somebody here won't set you back that much. From your handle, you may have plenty of 25-20 SS single shots already and are looking for something different.  Smiley
« Last Edit: Dec 8th, 2023 at 5:30pm by Old-Win »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cbashooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1561
Location: Eastern Wa.
Joined: Mar 31st, 2018
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #4 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 5:51pm
Print Post  
I shoot a 256 Mag in a Martini and Ruger #1 at low pressure though the actions can tske hotter loads.
the advantage is it can be made from cheap available 357 brass.Loaded to low pressure levels it's a nice cartridge to work with.
Cases easily formed with a standard Redding or RCBS set using the seating die as the initial form die running it in about 80%.

just my take anyhow
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1301
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #5 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 6:36pm
Print Post  
Maybe it a rare, long lost, Pope chambering that he only did, one time, for himself

This was likely written with "tongue in cheek", but there may actually be at least one such rifle.  Jim Grant's last book, Single-Shots Rifles Finale, pictures and describes a Stevens rebored, etc. in Pope's distinctive style from .22 Long to .32 Ideal. with the firing pin neatly and unobtrusively changed to centerfire.  The Pope-style mould is a reworked early (i.e., integral handles) Ideal .28-30.  The loading tool is an early Ideal "nutcracker" tool in .32 Ideal with the mould block very neatly removed.  The only mark is the often-encountered "WAX' stamp on the mould's hinge.  All the work is clearly period.

All-in-all, not a job meant for a client but most likely done just to test the potential of the .32 Ideal cartridge.

Reportedly, the outfit was once in the M. S. Risley collection.

Bill Lawrence
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2023 at 6:12am by MrTipUp »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7131
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #6 - Dec 8th, 2023 at 6:42pm
Print Post  
25-20 SS wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 4:08pm:
As stated above the chamber cast has been performed.

Can you give us the dimensions of the chamber cast.

Like taper, per .100 in length, neck diameter and length. Any shoulder, if so, dia and lg.



  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
art_ruggiero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1059
Location: CT
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #7 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 7:49am
Print Post  
if all else fails i would be interested in some 25/20ss brass   art
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1424
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #8 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 8:04am
Print Post  
Unless you can reproduce the cartridge case, a reline to .25 caliber and a rechambering is likely the simplest option.  Shortening the barrel means the loss of the base position for the mainspring, a gap in the repositioned forend as the barrel tapers, and a new extractor cut will also be needed.  Not to mention the loss of investment you’ve already made in ammunition, bullets and dies.

Short of that, the chamber might be bushed with a soldered-in piece of old barrel, and the bushing rechambered.  This if the unknown chamber is short enough for a reasonable throat length.

A picture of the chamber cast would definitely help here.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Boson
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 8
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Joined: Mar 10th, 2018
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #9 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 8:55am
Print Post  
I have a low wall that came as a 25-20 ss and I found it had a slight bulge in the bbl. Had it relined with a T J liner to the original 25-20 ss and after 95 ( whew ) test loads with no particular joy, the gunsmith found with gauges that there was a slight imperfection in the liner approximately 4 " back from the muzzle.  The choice was to cut 4" off the muzzle of my 28" bbl or reline again.  I shoot a 200 meter match monthly with a 32 caliber minimum so I had the bbl relined to 44-40 which was an original low wall caliber and use the rifle now in some of the monthly matches.  It shoots great with 3f swiss loads and now wish I had relined in 44-40 in the first place.
I had 100 plus 25-20 SS cases, a mold and dies which I sold in short order so no big loss there.  Just another thought for you to consider.  Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #10 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 9:03am
Print Post  
each square is 1/4"
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

357 head/rim in chamber
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

25-20 SS in chamber
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

diff in head size
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 9:59am by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sure shot
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 834
Location: East central Iowa
Joined: Jun 22nd, 2020
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #11 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 9:15am
Print Post  
How  about having  just the chamber sleeved and chamber to .25-20 ss, or have the barrel rebored to .32-20.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1424
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #12 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 11:31am
Print Post  
it looks like your rim seat is a little generous, but the rest of the dimensions look OK, for moderate loads at least.

I also had a .22 Long Low Wall that I had Redman rebore and rechamber to .32-20 back when he was doing such work.  I had him do the rimfire extractor the way yours is for the larger centerfire case and sometimes I wish I had all my extractors like that.  Very positive and no possibility of sneaking a small rim past the hook.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1642
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #13 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 11:53am
Print Post  
It looks like you have a lot going on with that action.  The breechblock is sitting quite high in the receiver and from this angle, looks like a highwall breechblock and not the early breechblock It also appears that it may have the wrong link. It has a scalloped hammer that came out later. What is the serial number and does the lower tang match the receiver? I guess you have to ask yourself. How well do you want this rifle to shoot? How much of the work can you do on your own?  What do you want it to look like when it's finished? From what it sounds like, you can do most of the work yourself. So you have to decide what you want this rifle to end up like before making the decision with your 3 barrel choices. How deep do you want to get into it money wise and will it be worth it to you when you get it all finished? Seeing the pictures of it now, I think your best choice would be to try to have the chamber lined.
.
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:03pm by Old-Win »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7131
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #14 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:46pm
Print Post  
Is there some reason that you don't want to use the chamber that it has?

357 Max brass can be formed to your chamber. I can walk you through how to do it.
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 15739
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #15 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:10pm
Print Post  
Since Winchester only serial numbered the lower tangs, is there a way to "match" lower tangs to receivers? I thought you could swap a lower tang to any other action and never know it was done?
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #16 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:10pm
Print Post  
This is a very early flat spring Winchester 1885. The S/N range shows it was made in 1887.  It has the high breech block as shown before they shortened them, same with the side walls of the receiver.  It's not a smooth side, low wall action.  The firing pin is CF and the hole in the breech block is dead center to the chamber. 

I have all the equipment (Lathe, Milling Machine) and the KSA (Knowledge, Skills and Ability) to put this all together.

Still just trying to figure out what it was chambered in or why the rim size and extractor is larger than the 25-20 SS head size but the chamber cast looks just like a 25-20 SS...

I will not fire a live 25-20 SS round in this chamber for fear it will burst the case head.  Seems the best thing to do for now is sit on it and think about setting the barrel shank back, re-threading and chambering it for 25-20 SS with a new extractor then fitting the main spring and forearm.
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:42pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2472
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #17 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:33pm
Print Post  
Vall,

You are pretty much correct about swapping lower tangs.  High walls and low wall tangs are different, however.  That said I have only experience with a dozen or so.
  

ASSRA # 11318
Plethora?  You say I have a plethora?.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #18 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:56pm
Print Post  
frnkeore wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:46pm:
Is there some reason that you don't want to use the chamber that it has?

357 Max brass can be formed to your chamber. I can walk you through how to do it.


That's an interesting idea.

Yes, please do.  I have lots of reloading equipment.

I'm at kgowe@comcast.net

A 25-20 SS Max.  I like the sound of that!
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 4:00pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1642
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #19 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:10pm:
Since Winchester only serial numbered the lower tangs, is there a way to "match" lower tangs to receivers? I thought you could swap a lower tang to any other action and never know it was done?


Vall, It's pretty easy to tell as the polish marks should match the same from the tang to the receiver as they were done together. You can easily switch out tangs but they usually don't match heighth wise either. The tang and the receiver should be smooth when you run a fingernail across them.  If they've been switched out, it's easy to feel that the two parts don't match.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1642
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #20 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 2:13pm
Print Post  
25-20 SS.  If you can get your hands on a copy of Campbell's Single Shot volume one, you can look on page 54 and 59 to see the difference in the early breechblock compared to the one in this rifle. If the breechblock is center fire and the barrel is marked .22 Long, obviously something is out of place.  I still think it's a high wall breechblock and not one from an early low wall.
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 2:33pm by Old-Win »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #21 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 2:40pm
Print Post  
Old-Win wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 2:13pm:
25-20 SS.  If you can get your hands on a copy of Campbell's Single Shot volume one, you can look on page 54 and 59 to see the difference in the early breechblock compared to the one in this rifle. If the breechblock is center fire and the barrel is marked .22 Long, obviously something is out of place.  I still think it's a high wall breechblock and not one from an early low wall.


You may be right or not...  I've seen a few early Low Wall's on line that show the high breech block and with the milled out frame as on the one I have.  This is a very early model.  It may be a hermaphrodite or the real deal.  Whatever the case, it's going to be made into a safe shooter.
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 3:08pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7131
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #22 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 4:53pm
Print Post  
25-20 SS wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
frnkeore wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:46pm:
Is there some reason that you don't want to use the chamber that it has?

357 Max brass can be formed to your chamber. I can walk you through how to do it.


That's an interesting idea.

Yes, please do.  I have lots of reloading equipment.

I'm at kgowe@comcast.net

A 25-20 SS Max.  I like the sound of that!

Do you have a arbor press or just a loading press?

Do you have a 25/20SS loading die?

I use a 2 ton arbor press for my case forming but, a loading press is fine.

Could I get your first name to address my Email to?
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #23 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 5:40pm
Print Post  
frnkeore wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 4:53pm:
25-20 SS wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
frnkeore wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:46pm:
Is there some reason that you don't want to use the chamber that it has?

357 Max brass can be formed to your chamber. I can walk you through how to do it.


That's an interesting idea.

Yes, please do.  I have lots of reloading equipment.

I'm at kgowe@comcast.net

A 25-20 SS Max.  I like the sound of that!

Do you have a arbor press or just a loading press?

Do you have a 25/20SS loading die?

I use a 2 ton arbor press for my case forming but, a loading press is fine.

Could I get your first name to address my Email to?


I have a 6 ton press and RCBS 25-20 SS die set.  I have the Lyman Orange Crusher + others reloading press too.  I have a full home shop machine shop.

Seems .357 Maximum brass is as hard to get as 25-20 SS.

I'm DAN in Santa Fe, NM

e-mail   kgowe@comcast.net
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 5:46pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bpjack
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2472
Location: East Olympia, WA
Joined: May 18th, 2008
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #24 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 7:42pm
Print Post  
The earliest non-cut down breech blocks had a horizontal drift pin holding in the firing pin.  I have two of those.  They take a firing pin with the cutout on top.   

Jack
  

ASSRA # 11318
Plethora?  You say I have a plethora?.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4034
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #25 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 9:56pm
Print Post  
.25-20 Stevens can be made from common .223, although it's a lot of work and requires you to make some job-specific tooling.  There's got to be a thread here about it, or I can send you the instructions.   

Is it possible that somebody ran a .25-20 WCF reamer into it?  Used to be a common bodge when WCF brass was plentiful but Stevens brass was not.  To do that right the barrel has to be set back 2 turns.  Not practical with a flat spring Winchester, so they left the gun with an almost useless hybrid chamber.  Making WCF brass with an extraordinarily long neck would make the gun usable.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7474
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #26 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 7:22am
Print Post  
Availability and thin walls 25/20 WCF brass would rule it out for me. If going 25/20 WCF better set it up for 32/20 necked to 25/20. Brass is just a bit different around the web & rim. Enough to cause problems extracting.

This from experience!

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1025
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #27 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:08pm
Print Post  
Almost looks like either a 32 ideal or 28-30 ran into a 25-20SS to neck it down.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #28 - Dec 11th, 2023 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
A little update.  I've searched the world over for an extractor.  They are made out of unobtanium as in not available!  I need one like in the photo.  I will have to cut down this extractor and silver solder a piece on, then fit and set in place when I ream out the chamber.   I have chosen to just set the barrel back, re thread and chamber to 25-20 SS, refit the main spring and forearm attachments.  This way the only thing to get/rent is the reamer.  This action and barrel while stripped down, will all be cleaned up and refinished.

This type of extractor will be made to fit the 25-20 SS rim.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Finished product to be announced....
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1736
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #29 - Dec 11th, 2023 at 3:06pm
Print Post  
I think C Sharps or MVA have those extractors.  If you can't find one, I can sell you one, I have several originals.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #30 - Dec 11th, 2023 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
ssdave wrote on Dec 11th, 2023 at 3:06pm:
I think C Sharps or MVA have those extractors.  If you can't find one, I can sell you one, I have several originals.


Sweet.  I'm very interested in one.  It has to be like photo but in .22 so I can fit it to a 25-20 SS rim when I chamber it.

I'm Dan at kgowe@comcast.com
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2023 at 4:27pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #31 - Dec 11th, 2023 at 4:49pm
Print Post  
Sure shot wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 9:15am:
How  about having  just the chamber sleeved and chamber to .25-20 ss, or have the barrel rebored to .32-20.


Sleeve just the chamber, now that's a neat idea.  Saves buying a barrel liner or setting the barrel back.   Just how is this done? I think I have an idea, but if you have the procedure, I'm interested.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
25-20 SS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 29th, 2023
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #32 - Dec 13th, 2023 at 5:25pm
Print Post  
I may be reading too much into this but I might just install a barrel liner. This way I won't have to set back the barrel and re-adjust the main spring and forearm attachment points. I just want to make sure that the liner will clean up the barrel breech end, as it is oversize (at .438") which is oversize for the 25-20 SS. It has a rim OD matching close to the .35/.357 +-. I see the liner drill from Brownell's is 7/16" OD (.4375").  The 25-20 Brownells barrel liner OD is .435". I think after drilling and with the epoxy filler it will clean up without any gaps at the breech face. This will keep the barrel at 24" too. Then chamber it for 25-20 SS. Still undecided as it has a good bore.  What would you do?

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Dec 13th, 2023 at 5:54pm by 25-20 SS »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1301
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #33 - Dec 13th, 2023 at 6:49pm
Print Post  
What would I do?  Since the barrel has a "good bore", I'd be inclined to sleeve the chamber.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cbashooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1561
Location: Eastern Wa.
Joined: Mar 31st, 2018
Re: Winchester 1885 LW problem
Reply #34 - Dec 13th, 2023 at 7:23pm
Print Post  
its about 357 magnum rim.
I'd look at 256 mag.my Ruger #1 is pretty accurate in that caliber
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 
Send TopicPrint