Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) 40-65 Remington (Read 956 times)
wcf3840
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


ASSRA Life #299

Posts: 355
Location: Palatine
Joined: May 28th, 2007
40-65 Remington
Jul 21st, 2022 at 1:51pm
Print Post  
What's the difference between a 40-65 Remington and a 40-65 Winchester?
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16104
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #1 - Jul 21st, 2022 at 4:43pm
Print Post  
Never heard of the ".40-65 Remington" cartridge? I have seen a .40-70 Remington, and it's very similar to the Winchester .40-65 with a case about .15" longer.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1897
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #2 - Jul 21st, 2022 at 5:13pm
Print Post  
There's .40-65 Ballard Everlasting, .40-65 Sharps Straight & .40-65 Winchester, but no .40-65 Remington.  The confusion may be due to the many .40-65 Remington rolling block rifles that fire the .40-65 Win.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
xtimberman
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 172
Location: N. Texas
Joined: Mar 26th, 2010
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #3 - Jul 21st, 2022 at 6:28pm
Print Post  
Grant mentions the 40-65 Remington several times in Chapter III, Remington Single-shot rifles, in his first book. In fact, on p. 115, he states ".40/65 Remington straight (which of course was the .40/70 Sharps Straight case 2 1/2 inches in length)". He discusses shooting this cartridge on p. 156-157 and confirms that, "some cases of E. Remington make are marked .40-65..."
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sureshot
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 296
Location: Snohomish
Joined: May 27th, 2007
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #4 - Jul 21st, 2022 at 7:10pm
Print Post  
I have a Hepburn that was originally 40-50 straight and marked 
40. 1 7/8 in front of the forearm then in very tiny letters stamped 
40-65. I assumed it was rechambered to 40-70 straight at some time.
When I got it it had been bored out to 45-70 and not wanting another 45-70 I had John Taylor reline it back to the original 40-50 straight.
It is a fairly light rifle and much more fun in 40-50 than 45-70.

Steve.   Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1308
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #5 - Jul 21st, 2022 at 9:52pm
Print Post  
"some cases of E. Remington make are marked .40-65..."

It's long been my impression - which could be dead wrong, of course - that the bigger companies often marketed rounds that were popular enough for good sales, even though the company itself did not regularly chamber the rounds.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16104
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #6 - Jul 22nd, 2022 at 10:30am
Print Post  
xtimberman wrote on Jul 21st, 2022 at 6:28pm:
Grant mentions the 40-65 Remington several times in Chapter III, Remington Single-shot rifles, in his first book. In fact, on p. 115, he states ".40/65 Remington straight (which of course was the .40/70 Sharps Straight case 2 1/2 inches in length)". He discusses shooting this cartridge on p. 156-157 and confirms that, "some cases of E. Remington make are marked .40-65..."


I've often wondered if Remington used something akin to Ballard's Everlasting cases at one time? Their version of the .40-50SS was originally listed as .40-45 Rem. and was the same external dimensions as the .40-50SS. 
Then there's the question of who came out with these similar cases first? If it was Remington first, and Sharps just stuffed 5 more grains in and put their name on the heavier load, it would be pretty common practice in one upmanship.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wcf3840
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline


ASSRA Life #299

Posts: 355
Location: Palatine
Joined: May 28th, 2007
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #7 - Jul 22nd, 2022 at 6:40pm
Print Post  
Talked to Tom Rowe today. He confirms that it was a Remington cartridge which was the same as the 40-70ss.
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1752
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #8 - Jul 22nd, 2022 at 11:23pm
Print Post  
And, don't forget the 40-60 Marlin, which is exactly same case as the 40-65 Win, just different bullet weight.
I had my hands on a 40-60 Marlin Model 1881. Should have bought it, complete with Marlin loading tool,etc.
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16104
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #9 - Jul 23rd, 2022 at 10:12am
Print Post  
beltfed wrote on Jul 22nd, 2022 at 11:23pm:
And, don't forget the 40-60 Marlin, which is exactly same case as the 40-65 Win, just different bullet weight.
I had my hands on a 40-60 Marlin Model 1881. Should have bought it, complete with Marlin loading tool,etc.
beltfed/arnie


I've got several 1881's in .40-60M Arnie. They were probably the most common caliber among the 4 cartridges offered in the 1881. Brophy's book shows there were close to 6300 built in .40-60M, and just under 4700 built in .45-70.
This one was built by Emil Flues into a repeating offhand schuetzen style rifle.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Before I went single shot crazy I owned a dozen 1881 Marlins in almost every configuration possible to order.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1752
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #10 - Jul 23rd, 2022 at 6:14pm
Print Post  
Marlinguy,
I had a 1881 , caliber 45 Govt for a number of years. 
I had bought it from Willie Johnson,  a boyhood neighbor of my father, As a kid, when spending haying time helping my cousins on my Grandfather's homestead in northern WI, I saw that rifle standing in Willie's kitchen when we visited him to help castrate a hog.   
What I really wanted to buy from Willie was his Win 1895 cal 405Win. But he would not sell it as he still hunted with it.
Anyways, Willie sold me his father, Chris Johnson's 1881 
45 Govt. It was the rifle that Chris bought new and used it mostly to shoot bears when they came near the yard under apple trees.
But, since i still have my Win '86 45-70, I finally sold it to a collector.
As to the M95-405, it "disappeared" from the farmhouse when Willie had to go to Madison for cancer treatment and passed away
"OK, so just another story....." 
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
xtimberman
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 172
Location: N. Texas
Joined: Mar 26th, 2010
Re: 40-65 Remington
Reply #11 - Jul 23rd, 2022 at 6:43pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Jul 22nd, 2022 at 10:30am:
xtimberman wrote on Jul 21st, 2022 at 6:28pm:
Grant mentions the 40-65 Remington several times in Chapter III, Remington Single-shot rifles, in his first book. In fact, on p. 115, he states ".40/65 Remington straight (which of course was the .40/70 Sharps Straight case 2 1/2 inches in length)". He discusses shooting this cartridge on p. 156-157 and confirms that, "some cases of E. Remington make are marked .40-65..."


I've often wondered if Remington used something akin to Ballard's Everlasting cases at one time? Their version of the .40-50SS was originally listed as .40-45 Rem. and was the same external dimensions as the .40-50SS. 
Then there's the question of who came out with these similar cases first? If it was Remington first, and Sharps just stuffed 5 more grains in and put their name on the heavier load, it would be pretty common practice in one upmanship.


I believe you are correct about that.
I fetched out my .40 cal. Hepburn this afternoon and re-remembered that it is stamped "40 2 1/2" ~4" in front of the forearm tip. It is an early E. Remington-marked example with a 3-digit SN. I acquired it in the mid 1970s and it came to me with the Remington grooved bullet mould, the straight-line bullet seater, and  a supply of 2 1/2" cases - half were unmarked folded-head for Berdan primers, and the other half were UMC brand with solid head Boxer primer pocket and stamped "40-70". I've been shooting it with Buffalo Arms "stretched" .30-40 cases ever since they began offering them.

All the other .40-65s cases mentioned before seem to have the .45-70 base.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint