Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Realistic accuracy expectations ? (Read 6455 times)
Nimrod
Junior Member
**
Offline


O.S.O.K.

Posts: 62
Location: Eastern New Mexico
Joined: Aug 8th, 2013
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #15 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 1:02pm
Print Post  
Really nice shooting, John Boy!
  

If you need more than one shot, you need more practice!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4234
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #16 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 1:31pm
Print Post  
This was my first 100 yard test load in my .40-65 Shiloh Sharps using 410 grain Boomer Money bullet with Swiss FFFg.
1.203" group including the first cold shot flyer. 
Fouled barrel shoots under 1 inch with blowing after each shot with a blow tube. 
Used Alberta Schuetzen Lube.
« Last Edit: Jan 22nd, 2022 at 1:37pm by Schuetzendave »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #17 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 2:05pm
Print Post  
I did miss the BP only point and I do apologize.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7732
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #18 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 4:06pm
Print Post  
To explain my comment, believe Mick was asking if smokeless would do better.

Results with iron sights are the primary limiter. Rule of thumb is 1 moa error, can be improved on with Arpeture front and rear adjusted for ambient light. By comparison scopes resolve by their power. 10x 1/10 moa 20x 1/20 moa and so on.

Bench shooting smaller groups will be fired with flat bottom forend riding on a solid rest. Matched with a straight bottom buttstock significant advantage over Sporter stock.

Shooters ability  to read conditions and handle the rifle on its rest another key variable.

What it comes to the load bullets fit temper and how well it’s cast, no bad ones, is the key accuracy component. Breech seating minimizes cartridge case as a factor.   

When it comes to powder, it’s a Fuel and needs to be suitable for the cartridge, no different than engines built for Gasoline  are different than Diesel engines.

40/65 case was designed for black powder. Straight wall large capacity 40 caliber bullet. Black powder is the optional propellant burn rate suits the capacity. Smokeless won’t fill the case & all sorts of workarounds to compensate for slack fill. Black fowling is a factor and needs to be managed. How to manage depends on how it’s going to be used. Timed relay re entry etc.

So my comment and opinion, not shared by everyone, is look for improved performance elsewhere. Case full of black is optional. How small could groups be ? ASSRA target is the standard. Very few 250 scores fired, hold the center it’s about as good as can be expected.

Boats 
« Last Edit: Jan 22nd, 2022 at 4:16pm by boats »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff_Schultz
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1661
Location: Ransomville, NY
Joined: Apr 25th, 2004
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #19 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 5:51pm
Print Post  
  I don't know of a 250 ever having been fired with black powder.
  

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo

“There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse."

  Confidence- The feeling you get before you fully understand the situation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #20 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 6:26pm
Print Post  
I do believe they might be capable of doing so but unfortunately more seem to be imore.nterested in winning matches instead of being able to get one to actually to do so?
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #21 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 6:35pm
Print Post  
Thanks for all the replies, at least I now have a better understanding as to what is possible with BP. My usual load in my Meacham Hi Wall which has a GM barrel is 61 gr of Wano PP, a BACO 400 gr Money Bullet and Federal 155 LMP primers seated through paper. This load, or minor variations of it, have produced 39 targets under 1" at 100m over the last two years during which time I shot about 600 targets, the  bulk of which were around 1.5" to 2". The rifle has  Lyman STS 24x scope on it. I have done a little experimenting with PP bullets but have had no success so far. As for shooting at 200m I have no experience with this rifle at all, our club shoots at 100m only and are mainly M/L shooters who tolerate heretics like myself to shoot with them just to keep the club numbers up.
Mike. 
PS  My CPA Stevens in 40-60 Maynard has shot more 1" groups than my 40-65 but I'm unsure if this is because I have shot it a lot more, or because  it has a Krieger barrel, or perhaps the 40-60 is a more accurate BP cartridge, perhaps I will never find that out.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #22 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 7:23pm
Print Post  
Mick B be aware of he who shoots but one rifle and has his own personal goals to achieve. The rest is simply hard work, a tremendous amount of dedication and countless hours being spent out at the range with just one. 
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1826
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #23 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 7:34pm
Print Post  
Once in a while, a 5 shot group like this is possible when everything comes together: 40-65 Custom orig HiWall/371gr DDEPP bullet over 74.5 gr Swiss 1.5 BP.  100yds off bench.
beltfed/arnie

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Lead Pot
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 154
Joined: Nov 12th, 2012
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #24 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 9:11pm
Print Post  
boats wrote on Jan 22nd, 2022 at 4:06pm:
To explain my comment, believe Mick was asking if smokeless would do better.

Results with iron sights are the primary limiter. Rule of thumb is 1 moa error, can be improved on with Arpeture front and rear adjusted for ambient light. By comparison scopes resolve by their power. 10x 1/10 moa 20x 1/20 moa and so on.

Bench shooting smaller groups will be fired with flat bottom forend riding on a solid rest. Matched with a straight bottom buttstock significant advantage over Sporter stock.

Shooters ability  to read conditions and handle the rifle on its rest another key variable.

What it comes to the load bullets fit temper and how well it’s cast, no bad ones, is the key accuracy component. Breech seating minimizes cartridge case as a factor.   

When it comes to powder, it’s a Fuel and needs to be suitable for the cartridge, no different than engines built for Gasoline  are different than Diesel engines.

40/65 case was designed for black powder. Straight wall large capacity 40 caliber bullet. Black powder is the optional propellant burn rate suits the capacity. Smokeless won’t fill the case & all sorts of workarounds to compensate for slack fill. Black fowling is a factor and needs to be managed. How to manage depends on how it’s going to be used. Timed relay re entry etc.

So my comment and opinion, not shared by everyone, is look for improved performance elsewhere. Case full of black is optional. How small could groups be ? ASSRA target is the standard. Very few 250 scores fired, hold the center it’s about as good as can be expected.

Boats 


Thank you. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #25 - Jan 22nd, 2022 at 10:10pm
Print Post  
Not sure if it's going to make much of a difference but I have made up a batch of 16/1 alloy to try instead of my usual 20/1 and 22/1. Regarding powder choices where I live ( Canberra ) only Wano was available in either F grades or P grades. Currently there is nothing available at all until mid year I'm told. A couple of years ago I tried  Swiss 1.5 and it was better than the Wano P grade by a small margin, however it was A$130 a kilo at the time, compared to Wano P grade at A$95 a kilo, a bit rich for my blood at the time. Rumour has it that the next shipment of Wano is likely to cost 130 a kilo  owing to much higher transport costs, golf might be a cheaper hobby perhaps.
Mike
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ISS
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Joined: Feb 24th, 2013
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #26 - Jan 23rd, 2022 at 12:14am
Print Post  
John Boy,

not to offend, but there's a reason nobody is shooting anything bigger than a .38-55 at an ASSRA or ISSA match.

I would love to go to Raton this summer and see somebody shoot a rifle with a similar load to yours and shoot a 250.  Or five targets on a single day that score 250 each.

IMHO, the reason most of us shoot a .32 caliber is the difficulty of casting enough bullets to shoot an entire season, five or more matches of two targets at a sitting, with anything smaller.
The Quarter-Bore Brigade guys amaze me on a good day, but they seldom shoot against the .32's and place high up the list.

Those are great targets shown here, but as one H.M.Pope once said, to paraphrase him: winning a match is not a matter of making all good shots, but of not making any bad ones.

Good discussion here...

Rich
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4234
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #27 - Jan 24th, 2022 at 1:18pm
Print Post  
Mick B: My .40-60 Maynard CPA would shoot better than my .40-65 WCF Shiloh Sharps.

The concentricity of the straight walled cases were a bit better in the .40-60 Maynard cases which I attribute to the slightly better accuracy. 
In my testing I was using the same BP load and bullet.

There used to be .40 caliber or larger competitions but the most common competitions were under .40 caliber. 
That is why the largest rifles were .38-55.

Regardless over the years the .32 caliber proved to be the most accurate from shooting bullets heavy enough to have good Kinetic Energy out to 200 yards.
However bullets were light enough that the rifle recoil was more manageable. 
Yes the over .40 caliber rifles have great Kinetic Energy however accuracy is more difficult due to the recoil.
That is why .32 calibers remain one of the most prominent calibers in the Schuetzen game.

Generally speaking BPCR rifles have 2 MOA accuracy with ability to get them down to 1 MOA whereas the smokeless plain base cast bullet shooting have 1 MOA accuracy with the capability to get it down to 1/2 MOA.

Picture of .32 RKS five five shot groups at 100 yards with smokeless that average 0.452".
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2022 at 1:43pm by Schuetzendave »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2944
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #28 - Jan 24th, 2022 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
hepburnman wrote on Jan 22nd, 2022 at 11:59am:
Concerning what accuracy might be possible with blackpowder here are some results that I obtained recently at 200 yds. This was off the bench with a 20x scope. 
One group is of a 410 gr Saeco bullet and the second is a 429 gr custom bullet design. I've heard that the muzzle-velocity standard deviation for blackpowder can be lower than that of smokeless powders (meaning lower vertical spread).

That's about what my 335gr 'chicken bullet' does at 200yd with 56gr of 2F Swiss. Nice, 1moa at 200yd is just fine with me.

beltfed wrote on Jan 22nd, 2022 at 7:34pm:
Once in a while, a 5 shot group like this is possible when everything comes together: 40-65 Custom orig HiWall/371gr DDEPP bullet over 74.5 gr Swiss 1.5 BP.  100yds off bench.
beltfed/arnie


Ian has been playing with PP in his 38-50 and think his bullet weighs 343. With 65(69?)gr of 3F he is getting in the 1490 range for MV.
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2022 at 6:23pm by SSShooter »  

Glenn - Stevens 044 1/2, Bartlein SS 5R barrel in 22LR
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
RJ-35-40
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 334
Location: Saint Augustine
Joined: Dec 7th, 2016
Re: Realistic accuracy expectations ?
Reply #29 - Feb 13th, 2022 at 12:19pm
Print Post  
This is a 20 shot group shot from a Browning Hi Wall M78 in 45-70. 
Because I am NOT a good shot I like to do load development off
a bench with a scope. 
So this is what the rifle is capable of, not me.  

1-1/4" (plus 1 flyer off pic 1" to right)
100 yards 
72 Grains Swiss #4 (1-1/2 F) Compressed .1
20-1 515 gr. Brooks Gov. 457125
Fed GM 150M primers
Wax wad
AVG 1205 fps
All cases full length resized

Mick B wrote on Jan 21st, 2022 at 5:38pm:
This may be difficult to answer but with a 40-65 Hi Wall copy assuming it has a quality barrel, and using cast lead bullets and black powder what sort of groups at 100 would be considered very good for a five shot group an a good day ?.
Mike.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint