Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Ladder test with a muzzleloader (Read 2989 times)
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Sep 24th, 2021 at 1:07am
Print Post  
Thought you guys would like to see the results of a ladder test using a Hawkins-style custom .50cal caplock muzzleloader.  Other than shooting a deer with it last year the rifle has been hanging over the fireplace for at least 30 years.  I competed with it for a few years in the late ‘80’s.  Our silhouette club is holding a muzzleloader “turkey shoot” around Thanksgiving.  So I’m getting it ready.  I used 90grs of 3Fg for hunting but until now never attempted to determine the load the rifle prefers.  Based on the results 75grs seems to be the sweet spot.  I was amazed at the accuracy.

As noted, an 8X scope (Leatherwood vintage-style) was used for the test.  It will be removed since only iron sights are allowed for the turkey shoot.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #1 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 9:17am
Print Post  
For those of you not familiar with a ladder test, it’s a “short cut” method to identify one or more velocity “sweet spots” during one shooting session.  To be more specific, the following definition is from an article by Jason Baney.
“A ladder test is, fundamentally, a method of testing load combinations using continuous increments while looking for a cluster of consecutive shots showing similar points of impact (POI).  Usually the powder charge is adjusted incrementally while noting/tracking the point of impact variations in the vertical plane and looking for plateaus on the target.  The idea being that your best load will appear where several sequential, incremental charges impact nearly the same vertical location on the target.”
Although it should be clear from the above comments I should stress that only the vertical displacements of the POIs are important, the horizontal displacements are ignored.

BTW, the square used for the target aiming point is 2" x 2".

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1734
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #2 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 11:49am
Print Post  
Yup, 75 grains seems to be the ideal load...
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12328
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #3 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 3:54pm
Print Post  
I had to read some forums, articles and watch a couple videos before I finally got it.  It's still sinking in, slowly.

I have to agree, the primitive round ball can be very accurate.

What sort of SDs did you get?  See, I did learn something.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1151
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #4 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:22pm
Print Post  
I read the article in Black Powder news and thought about trying it.  Seems like you need a scope and 200 yards to do it.  I wonder how well it will work with open sights?  I developed the load for my 54 caliber flintlock Hawken years ago using the old fashioned trial and error methods.   Ended up with 100 grains of FFFg under a .526 round ball.   I've used the same load for both target and hunting very successfully.  That load hits dead on at 100 yards, is 2" high at 25, and 3" high at 50 yards.   Since the 25 yard target was 4" and the 50 yard one 6,"  shooting at those three ranges was pretty simple.   Sights are non adjustable, primative, stights.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #5 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:27pm
Print Post  
westerner wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 3:54pm:
I had to read some forums, articles and watch a couple videos before I finally got it.  It's still sinking in, slowly.
I have to agree, the primitive round ball can be very accurate.
What sort of SDs did you get?  See, I did learn something.


I was not interested in the SD so no velocities were measured.  The only goal was to determine the load that resulted in the best POI grouping.  BTW, all the charges were measured by volume using a muzzleloader powder measure.

Wayne
  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
texasmac
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2153
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Aug 16th, 2004
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #6 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:37pm
Print Post  
George Babits wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:22pm:
I read the article in Black Powder news and thought about trying it.  Seems like you need a scope and 200 yards to do it.  I wonder how well it will work with open sights?  I developed the load for my 54 caliber flintlock Hawken years ago using the old fashioned trial and error methods.   Ended up with 100 grains of FFFg under a .526 round ball.   I've used the same load for both target and hunting very successfully.  That load hits dead on at 100 yards, is 2" high at 25, and 3" high at 50 yards.   Since the 25 yard target was 4" and the 50 yard one 6,"  shooting at those three ranges was pretty simple.   Sights are non adjustable, primative, stights.
George


George,
If using a BPC rifle I would agree that 200yds is the minimum when running a ladder test.  And yes, a good spotting scope to see the hits and at least a 10X rifle scope is needed - 15X to 25X would be better.  I've used 10X and more recently a 25X Lyman scope on my BPCRs when running a ladder test.

But 75yds or so is very adequate for a muzzleloader with an 8X or even a 6X rifle scope.  At that distance I doubt I could get any kind of measurable results using iron sights.  I had drilled/tapped & mounted a Leatherwood vintage style 8X scope on the rifle for hunting which made the test doable.

Wayne
« Last Edit: Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:43pm by texasmac »  

NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12328
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #7 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 6:01pm
Print Post  
texasmac wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:27pm:
westerner wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 3:54pm:
I had to read some forums, articles and watch a couple videos before I finally got it.  It's still sinking in, slowly.
I have to agree, the primitive round ball can be very accurate.
What sort of SDs did you get?  See, I did learn something.


I was not interested in the SD so no velocities were measured.  The only goal was to determine the load that resulted in the best POI grouping.  BTW, all the charges were measured by volume using a muzzleloader powder measure.

Wayne


From everything I've read so far, the ten shot ladder method has to be based on a node/flat spot in SDs using a chronograph. 

Now I'm confused all over again. Huh
« Last Edit: Sep 24th, 2021 at 7:16pm by westerner »  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1300
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #8 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 6:47pm
Print Post  
westerner wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 6:01pm:
texasmac wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 5:27pm:
westerner wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 3:54pm:
I had to read some forums, articles and watch a couple videos before I finally got it.  It's still sinking in, slowly.
I have to agree, the primitive round ball can be very accurate.
What sort of SDs did you get?  See, I did learn something.


I was not interested in the SD so no velocities were measured.  The only goal was to determine the load that resulted in the best POI grouping.  BTW, all the charges were measured by volume using a muzzleloader powder measure.

Wayne


From everything I've read so far, the ten shot ladder method has to be based on a node in SDs using a chronograph. 

Now I'm confused all over again. Huh

There's a bit more to it than 10 shots, as you have been reading, but it can start narrowing down a load very quickly.

Part of the problem is that it was designed to work off of maximum pressure, where for concerns here it's more likely to be more of an arbitrary maximum velocity or pressure.

Tests like this are where the arguments start as to whether SD has the meaning that people like to attach to it at long distance.

If you're interested is checking if the system works, it would be worth it to do it with jacketed bullets marked as done in the linked article. It's pretty easy to have confidence when you walk up to a target and see multiple colors in the same group.

The problem with a single bullet test is that you might have three shots that found there place by accident. Until you repeat it and have repeatable results, it's questionable data.

I would spend some time with at 10 grain spread at another 50-100 yards out and see how it shakes out.

It's a great start and really shows how a lot of the stuff done with the modern long distance guys can be applied at shorter distances.

Not sure if this is one you read, Westerner, but Jason has written about this test a lot on Accurate Shooter. His articles are worth seeking out.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #9 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 6:58pm
Print Post  
My best year round and most consistently accuracy results. Have always been had with real bad SD's and Extreme Spreads. This also while shooting through a Ballistic system on weeks on end.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12328
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #10 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 7:32pm
Print Post  
I understand what you've done now Tex. So obvious I didn't get it.  Next session at a bench I'm going to try it. 


  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12328
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #11 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 7:42pm
Print Post  
No, I have not read that one, Tod. I'll read it. 

Since my Oehler chronograph is serial number one I never use it and that is why Tex's method has my interest.  If it saves me a few shots I'm all for it. 

Wait, I forgot, the wind blows like a dirty mother here.  I'll try it anyway. Undecided
« Last Edit: Sep 25th, 2021 at 5:08am by westerner »  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1300
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #12 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 8:37pm
Print Post  
westerner wrote on Sep 24th, 2021 at 7:42pm:
No, I have not read that one, Tod. I'll read it. 

Since my Oeler chronograph is sereal number one I never use it and that is why  Tex's method has my interest.  If it saves me a few shots I'm all for it. 

Wait, I forgot, the wind blows like a dirty mother, here.  I'll try it anyway. Undecided


There is nothing new under the sun. Just find it different ways.

Looking for a wide charge weight/load that exits the barrel in the sweet spot of the vibration, isn’t much different than using a hammer to find out where to place a barrel sled. Maybe a bit more refined.

Some of these guys try and calculate down to the millisecond and get pretty close. Ultimately it still has to proven on paper.

It would interesting for arguments sake, to find the load, then run it over the chronograph, or Wayne to do that with his loads.

A high ES/SD at the right time, seems to beat a low ES/SD at the wrong time. Having both is when the chronograph comes into play.

To see this play out with a muzzle loader is a lot of fun.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1151
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #13 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 8:55pm
Print Post  
Well, it will be a cold day in hell when I drill/tap my 54  flint Hawken just to see if I missed the mark figuring out a load the old fashioned way.   Besides that, I get to do a lot more shooting shooting 5 shot groups 1 grain apart with any rifle I am trying to work up a load for.    Never could get my eyes to work well with a scope so just stick with open and peep sights.  Never have to worry about either fogging up either.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12328
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Ladder test with a muzzleloader
Reply #14 - Sep 24th, 2021 at 9:38pm
Print Post  
My Hawken has peep sights. Better than a scope.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint